Talk:List of Doom ports

Commodore 64 and VIC-20

Should the C64 version of Doom be included? The project page is here: https://scpu.amidog.se/doku.php?id=scpu%3Adoom Here's a video of it running in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZzivzuDOls&ab_channel=NostalgiaNerd JettaMann (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Untitled

Here's a question. The first version of DOOM (that is, the first publicly-available version, not counting the betas etc.) actually identified itself as 0.99, not 1.0. Was there a separate 1.0 version afterwards, or did id directly jump to 1.1? -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 01:18, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

DOOM 2 and Final DOOM

Can we mention DOOM 2 and Final DOOM in this article? We could at least denote that some of these ports support DOOM 2 and/or Final DOOM. --SuperDude 06:55, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

I removed...

I removed the statement "(most notably the Sony PlayStation version which incorporates elements of Doom II including monsters, into levels based upon the original Doom)." This statement is not entirely accurate. The Playstation version of Doom includes every level of both Doom and Doom II, not just "elements" of Doom II.

Nearly every level, not quite all.PeterCT 13:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Jaguar

Needs further info on the Jaguar version. I hear it used most of the buttons on its controller for a huge amount of weapons.

That's essentially correct(though I don't think 6 weapons(plus bare hands) is "a huge amount"). AtariAge has scans of the entire Doom manual at http://www.atariage.com/manual_thumbs.html?SoftwareLabelID=1078 if you want to go over that for details. I'd edit the info into the article myself, but I'm not sure which stuff is different from other Doom versions.--Martin IIIa (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

The Ultimate Doom

The Ultimate Doom redirects here, although this article does not discuss multiple versions of the commercial doom releases. Therefore the redirect seems inappropriate. -- Jon Dowland 13:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

I tell a lie, it does. OK, well the information about the different variants of the game (vs. platforms it has been ported to, or derived sources) is not expressed clearly enough. For instance it isn't present in the contents at the top. -- Jon Dowland 13:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

SNES Doom and Super FX2

The article mentions that the SNES cartridge of Doom did not contain a Super FX2... It mentions that it is "largely untrue" - it is either true or it isn't... the cartridge can't half contain a Super FX processor. In any case, the wiki article on the Super FX refers to the SNES version of Doom, indicating that it *does* contain the chip. One of the articles is wrong, in that case.

The box did have a SuperFX logo Ace of Sevens 03:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I always knew it did contain one - there's no way a 16-bit 3.5 MHz processor alone would handle a game like Doom. EpiVictor 10:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirecting from "Playstation Doom" to here.

Does anyone agree it would make sense to have it so that when you type in "playstation doom" in wikipedia's search engine, it should go straight to the Playstation Doom section in here? Likewise with other versions too I guess, although that's the main one.. Doom jester 07:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

ZX Spectrum version - removal or changing?

I don't think the Spectrum version is on the same league with the other source ports and versions of Doom in the article: all the others have in common that they are based at least in part on id's source code, either by a commercial license or after the game's source code was made public, and use the original WAD files (or a modification thereof) as the source of their data. The Spectrum version (and others like the TI-83 etc.) fulfill none of these "requirements", and are mostly Wolf-3D-ish engines which use custom made data, written from scratch, and with the word Doom slapped on them. On these grounds, I feel the ZX Spectrum version should be removed from the article or mentioned in a special section with those facts evident. For now I just added some notes onto the ZX Spectrum subsection itself, but I think deletion or reassignment should be considered. EpiVictor 00:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The article is getting pretty big. Maybe there could be an article that is just about cut-down versions or unofficial ones or something like that. Also I think it's worth having a new article specifically for the Playstation version because there's enough information. Merlin1981 16:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Categories of Port Systems Games

Shouldn't there be categories at the bottom of the page like 3do games etc.? The only thing I'm wondering though is how you would do it because if you do that, when you go to the 'list of 3do games' page, it will have 'Versions and ports of Doom' on it instead of Doom. How do we get this sorted out so everything works properly? Merlin1981 16:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Doom64.jpg

Image:Doom64.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Psxdoom23.JPG

Image:Psxdoom23.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:3d0doom.JPG

Image:3d0doom.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Doom64.jpg

Image:Doom64.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Gbadoom.jpg

Image:Gbadoom.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Snesdoom.JPG

Image:Snesdoom.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Zodiacdoom.JPG

Image:Zodiacdoom.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Spectrumdoom.GIF

Image:Spectrumdoom.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Doom logo.jpg

Image:Doom logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:32X Doom.JPG

Image:32X Doom.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Err, isn't there? I seem to see "To show a screenshot of a console version of a PC video game, for comparison purposes.". What's wrong with that? Ben 2082 (talk) 12:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You need to read the article that the above post links to. Here's a quote from it: "Good use rationales will expand on why the non-free item is needed, why a free item cannot be used in its place, and what essential function it performs in each article in which it is to be used." The rationale you quote only accomplishes the last of those three things, and does so in a horribly vague manner at that.--24.60.220.148 (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Source Ports (Windows)

I had a look at the "Versions and ports of Doom" wiki page. It doesn't cover the Windows source ports, such as Doom Legacy, DoomGL, ZDoomGL, GLDoom, and the history of each source port, and lost of source port code, etc. There's a full list on DoomWorld source port pages.

Should this information go in this article? If so I wouldn't mind writing about some of the earlier ones, like GLDoom and the author's hard drive blew up and lost all his code.. and it was a good looking port too. Also there's so many source ports with similar names and it gets all confusing, so it would be nice to list these similar named ports and clarify any confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwan1980 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Where is the Amiga CD32 port?

Where is the Amiga CD32 port, i had relevent infomation about it to tell anyone, with intrest about the article. It would be good if it could be added. P.S I have just written an edit discuss on this article and it vanshied into thin air. If this can be sorted it would help, thankyou mcjakeqcool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcjakeqcool (talk • contribs) 10:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

The games you added are Doom clones, not ports.--Drat (Talk) 13:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Doom Clones=Negative

So let me get this strait, Doom clones are not doom ports, okie dokie. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 12:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Doom 95 on Windows XP/Vista/7

I don't know about the rest of the world, but I have mostly had no issues at all with DOOM on the aformentoned OS's. The game does have some neon colours when it gets minimized, but i've only needed one DLL for the LAN networking. The mouse doesn't work though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.91.50 (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Plan 9 and AROS

Doom has also been ported to Plan 9 from Bell Labs (see) and AROS.--Athaba (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Listing models DOOMD is compatible with

Would it be appropriate to list camera models of which the digita OS port is compatible with? Lennas (talk) 03:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

What about JDOOM?

A friend of mine showed me a 'souped-up' version called JDOOM, where everything was the same as in doom 1, except for the fact that all the walls have been animated from scratch in a higher resolution. I do not know if this version has ever been released for the public or that it was some kind of beta-version... So my question is: is there anybody out there who knows more about it than I do? And would he or she be so kind to add it to this page? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 17:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

JDoom is not an official port, and therefore it's listed here. --uKER (talk) 17:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanx man, I had to wait for this information since I've last seen this version... 20 years ago or so...Oxygene7-13 (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Doom by Eltechs?

Why no mention of this? While hard to find now, I have it on my Galaxy Tab and it seems to be a pretty good port all things considered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.230.132 (talk) 02:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

It's not official in any way, by the looks of things.--Drat (Talk) 08:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Official versions of Doom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.idsoftware.com/idstuff/source/doomsrc.txt
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091015105126/http://www.idsoftware.com/iphone-doom-classic-progress/ to http://www.idsoftware.com/iphone-doom-classic-progress/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Official versions of Doom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720230535/http://www.rome.ro/lee_killough/memorabilia/swastika.shtml to http://rome.ro/lee_killough/memorabilia/swastika.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070628235241/http://forums.newdoom.com/showthread.php?t=30202 to http://forums.newdoom.com/showthread.php?t=30202
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120120184640/http://www.platformnation.com/2012/01/18/doom-available-on-xbla-again/ to http://www.platformnation.com/2012/01/18/doom-available-on-xbla-again/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Nintendo Switch

Why isn't the Nintendo Switch under Consoles? I have one and can confirm that it is used primarily as a console. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RatherCoolDude (talk • contribs) 12:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

It is a console, and the redundant entry (it's already mentioned as part of the 25th anniversary releases) was removed. oknazevad (talk) 18:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

List of unofficial source ports merged into this article

Someone performed a merge that brought into this article (previously dedicated to official Doom ports) a list (note list, not article) of unofficial source ports, a list that not only is larger than the original article we had here, but is also of very questionable quality and completeness. The author says there was a discussion previous to the change being made, but it was supposedly in the Wikiproject Videogames talk page, not here as it should have happened, and even then I can't find any record of it. If nobody opposes, I'm pushing to have that list back to its own list as it was before. --uKER (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done --uKER (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh uh Yowwwk7391 (talk) 23:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

For the record, the merge was restored a week later, with an edit summary which links directly to the precise thread where the merge was originally discussed. Yes, the merge discussion should have been held on this talk page per Wikipedia policy, and that procedural consideration certainly would have saved uKER some time, but from the looks of it there isn't enough push here to overturn the consensus. Martin IIIa (talk) 23:36, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Improved diagram of popular source ports

I have generated a new slightly updated and imho improved diagram of the common source ports.

1. It adds few recent forks of some of the known ports that are getting popular too.

2. It removes the requirement for the Boom-compatible ports to be in a subgraph, because that is deforming the graph in an undesirable way.

3. It adds a legend.

Can someone please review this diagram and add it to the article if appropriate? https://www.mediafire.com/file/gvbidhtqyxhjxp6/doom_source_ports.svg/file

The graphviz source code if someone wants to experient: https://www.mediafire.com/file/rz65a0mu7eq7ofe/doom_source_ports.dot/file Youda008 (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

What doesn't count

It should be noted that the list of "devices" it's been ported to should only count actual ports to actual equipment where Doom actually "runs on" the device itself. Things have gotten out of hand in the past few years with media reporting things like Doom running on a pregnancy-test or a LEGO-brick and such when it was doing no such thing. In cases like these, it's running on an Arduino that was simply crammed into the aforementioned items, and thus does NOT count as "running on" them. By that logic, you could shove the same Arduino into a banana and claim "Doom is running on an banana" (or an apple and say it's "running on an Apple"), or swallow the Arduino and say it's "running on a human", or embed a smartphone running Doom into a toaster, and countless other nonsense examples. These sorts of things should not be included.There's already a note about it being ported to a Raspberry Pi, and adding a note about it being ported to Arduino is sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synetech (talk • contribs) 21:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Should we remove the Nintendo Entertainment System/Famicom port then? Martin IIIa (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

It has been well over two weeks with no response to my question, so I'll give WP:BRD a shot and remove the Nintendo Entertainment System/Famicom port from the list. Martin IIIa (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Nuon port

An article in Next Generation 40 (April 1998) mentions that VM Labs were using a source port of Doom as a demo for the Nuon. This struck me as significant because this was just a month or two after the Doom source code was released, so it must have been one of the first source ports, perhaps the first, and because it was actually being used a hardware tech demonstration. However, I'm not well-versed enough in source ports to be certain this is notable enough to mention in the article, and I've also noticed the source ports section has no sub-section for home consoles (only personal computers, portables, and virtual machines. So I put it to anyone who would care to answer: Should I add this to the article? And if so, where? Martin IIIa (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nintendo Alarmo port

https://x.com/GaryOderNichts/status/1852753537001718021 Is this enough to cite the existence of the unofficial Alarmo port? ItzSwirlz (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Oh, and here's the GitHub link. ItzSwirlz (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)