User talk:Schneelocke

Proposed deletion of Juiblex

The article Juiblex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional character that fails WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not an in-universe fictional biography summary. Could be soft deleted by redirecting to List of Forgotten Realms deities.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juiblex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juiblex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juiblex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Stage 2 Pokémon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Stage 2 Pokémon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Stage 2 Pokémon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Stage 1 Pokémon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Stage 1 Pokémon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Stage 1 Pokémon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Basic Pokémon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Basic Pokémon. Since you had some involvement with the List of Basic Pokémon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cthylla

The article Cthylla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is another example of "Lovecruft" that has not been discussed by academics or journalists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 05:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emma Härdelin

The article Emma Härdelin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tsathoggua for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsathoggua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsathoggua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:RFP" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:RFP. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 7#Wikipedia:RFP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🐔 Chic dat ^ChickenDatabase 12:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:RFP" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:RFP. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 10#Wikipedia:RFP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ichhassemusik cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ichhassemusik cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Knorkator zualt cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knorkator zualt cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tributetounsselbst cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tributetounsselbst cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PicturesAtAnExhibition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PicturesAtAnExhibition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcome newcomers

Template:Welcome newcomers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Field (mathematics) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Field (mathematics) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:A" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:A and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 7#Wikipedia:A until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. interstate five 17:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qu You

The article Qu You has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article entirely unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 08:27, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Butterfree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Butterfree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butterfree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]