Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Durian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

A page-relevant wondering

[edit]

I wonder if we have anyone in the tropical cyclone project that speaks the various languages spoken in the Phillipines and Vietnam. If so, they could be of tremendous help for this article. Sometimes I wonder if our project's focus on the western Hemisphere merely has to do with our understanding of English and Spanish moreso than our familiarity with TPC. I'm sure data isn't as scarce as it appears to be (to those of us that mainly speak English) for foreign countries. Thegreatdr 16:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Durian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content

[edit]

@Binbin0111: With this edit you added content to the article without a source. Instead, you wrote "sources cited in text". Of the three sources in that text, two do not appear to link to any content, and the third does not support your edit. Are you able to add sources to support your edit? If not, will you remove your edit until you can find sources? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging the Philippines sub-article

[edit]

The Philippines sub-article is only 34 kb, and the main article is only 31 kb. The main article can easily handle the info on where the main impacts occurred. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly Support – Per Hurricanehink. The main article doesn't have all that much content and can easily accommodate the content from the Philippines impacts article. We should not fork out content unless we absolutely have to, as it's better to keep as much information in one place as possible. Merging the two articles would consolidate the information we have on this storm and make a much stronger article. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Meteorological history of Typhoon Durian into Typhoon Durian. (non-admin closure) Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The parent article (3,422 words, 56,136 bytes) can accommodate the ridiculously-small-for-a-B-class meteorological history article (1381 words, 19,477 bytes) if it was merged (4,803 words, 75,613 bytes) without exceeding the recommended split size. Other than crossing basins, which I believe isn't a strong enough reason for a meteorological article being notable, Typhoon Durian's meteorological history isn't very significant; rather, it was the tropical cyclone's impacts in the Philippines that made it notable. In fact, this article only gets 105 pageviews per month, which really puts the article to shame. Considering the parent article is a C-class, merging the met. history article would increase the parent article's comprehensiveness and quality, which is a good thing if that article is ever going to be a GA/FA. ZZZ'S 06:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – per nom, but page views aren't a factor whether or not an article gets merged. SomeoneWiki04 (talk) 06:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was used to prove that the tropical cyclone was not notable because of its meteorological history. ZZZ'S 10:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.