Talk:Tinker Bell (film)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Film credit verification
[edit]IMDB.com credits Mae Whitman as the voice of Tinker Bell, not Brittany Murphy.
Does anyone have any info on if Brittany Murphy has been replaced or not, I have not heard information on that and IMDb isn't always the most reliable source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.72.77.223 (talk) 04:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Oddly placed
[edit]I think this paragraph:
"Because of the controversies surrounding Tinker Bell, Disney has announced that no more straight-to-DVD sequels will be produced with The Little Mermaid III being the last one.[7] Although they have proven to be big money-makers for Disney and also very popular with their target demographic (children and their parents), the straight-to-DVD sequels have received a lot of backlash. Critics and purists have branded them "cheapquels" with many claiming that they are inferior and unnecessary. Some, John Lasseter included, have expressed disgust and feel that Disney has become more concerned with making a quick buck rather than maintaining the integrity of their earlier classics."
Doesn't belong in this article. Maybe an article on cheapquels themselves is called for. In spite of the claim in the first sentence it isn't clear how cheapquels relate to the topic of the article.--MTHarden 22:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The Fairies
[edit]The fairies are in different groups these groups are:
Water fairies - the water fairies are good with water. They put the dew drops on spider webs, with their steady, fast hands.
Animal fairies - animal fairies are good with animals, the animals trust them and accept their help. In the film the animal fairies teaches baby birds to fly.
Garden fairies - garden fairies are good with plans. The plant bulbs and flowers, so they bloom accordingly.
Light fairies - they create rainbows and can change the direction of light.
Winter fairies - the winter faired freeze the air, and make the snow.
Fast fairies - the fast fairies fly fast and can control wind. In the film we see her making a small tornado, pollinating flowers.
Tinker fairies - Tinker fairies build and fix things, they tinker. In the film we see them make pots and things for the nature fairies. They do the behind the scene work for the changing of seasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadinerater (talk • contribs) 20:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Music fairies - The fairies that play music for all of Pixie Hollow.
Art fairies - The artists of Pixie Hollow.
Dust Keeper fairies - The fairies who hand out your amount of pixie dust.
Storm fairies - The fairies who create storms.
Sequals
[edit]Is it true that there will be 3 DTV sequals to this film? Disney annoced that this and TLM 3 were to be the last sequals.So why are they continuing this film if they can't make more "cheapquals"?65.0.181.111 (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that it is true. There is a press release with proof. - Jasonbres (talk) 17:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well,if it is then why did they say this was their last sequal?And will there be more sequals like Jungle Book 2 & Return to Neverland? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.0.181.111 (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Technically, this isn't a sequel. It's a spinoff. At the time, they were considering Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning to be their last sequel, but I'm guessing that after the last Tinker Bell sequel, Cars 2 and Toy Story 3, there won't be any sequels unless there is demand for sequels by the general public. - Jasonbres (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- The main question has been whether Disney would make cheap direct to video sequels for theatrical feature films. There's less opposition within the company to sequels that are "done right" (i.e. a good story, full production budget, theatrical release, etc). The fact that they've already spent so much money on this one is probably why it's being finished made... and later sequels to a movie that's only released on DVD in the first place (like this one) don't upset the sequel-haters the same way. As for what will actually happen... it's not appropriate to speculate here. - JasonAQuest (talk) 12:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Technically, this isn't a sequel. It's a spinoff. At the time, they were considering Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning to be their last sequel, but I'm guessing that after the last Tinker Bell sequel, Cars 2 and Toy Story 3, there won't be any sequels unless there is demand for sequels by the general public. - Jasonbres (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well,if it is then why did they say this was their last sequal?And will there be more sequals like Jungle Book 2 & Return to Neverland? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.0.181.111 (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Removal of "needs infobox" tag
[edit]This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:12822 tinkerbell.JPG
[edit]Image:12822 tinkerbell.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
"Music" section
[edit]This needs to be rewritten. It reads like a press release. JuJube (talk) 22:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- That's because it was a press release (copied verbatim from the cited source). I've removed the offending material. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
But, The movie takes place before the great fire that destroyed the pixie dust tree, after the fire mother dove was discovered that she was the only thing that could make pixie dust, and that's why there's no "pixie dust tree" in the books because they take place after the fire —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.86.128 (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
"Differences between this film and the Disney Fairies series" section
[edit]There is an error in this section. In the universe of the books, the Pixie Dust Tree did exist but was destroyed in a battle. The fairies then had to find Mother Dove to create Pixie Dust. (I got my information from the book "In the Realm of the Never Fairies: The Secret World of Pixie Hollow", page 64, ISBN number: 078684765-4) I know this is additional to -SineBot's information, I just wanted to add the reference information.
The text
The score to the film was composed by Joel McNeely, who recorded the music with an 88-piece ensemble of the Hollywood Studio Symphony at the Sony Scoring Stage.[13]
should be replaced by
The score to the film was composed by Joel McNeely, who recorded the music with an 88-piece ensemble of the Hollywood Studio Symphony and Celtic Violin Soloist Máiréad Nesbitt at the Sony Scoring Stage.[13]
Bruce (bruce@maireadnesbitt.com)
91.19.132.103 (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Done. If you sign up for an account and get some additional edits under your belt, you'll be able to edit semiprotected pages yourself. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Planned improvements, disclosure
[edit]I am going to begin making improvements to this article shortly. I believe they will be entirely uncontroversial but, in keeping with Wikipedia's coflict of interest advisory, I want to disclose that Disney is a client of my employer. They are aware of my plans for this page, although the work is entirely my own. I probably will have suggestions that may involve more careful value judgments, and in those cases I will seek community input before making such changes. If you have any questions about my edits, please don't hesitate to be in touch here or on my Talk page. Cheers, NMS Bill (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Edit request from Cloudfinalfantasy, 7 October 2010
[edit]{{edit semi-protected}}
body of request removed by Kww
Cloudfinalfantasy (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Declined Specify which changes you want to make, don't just provide a new copy of the article.—Kww(talk) 04:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Edit request on 7 January 2012
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On about the 4th of 5th paragraph of the plot, the first sentence is "as a last resort, Tinkerbell asks Vidia for help on being a garden fairy" but Vidia is a fast flying fairy so it has been typed wrong.
82.40.191.187 (talk) 08:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- No, that's correct. It doesn't say that Vidia is a garden fairy, only that Tinkerbell asks her for help. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
TinkerBell?
[edit]Her name is always so close together it looks like "TinkerBell". Also, if it's two separate names why is she always more often than not called Tinker Bell as if is one name? -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 02:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I wish to edit/update a reference used in this article as it is currently unavailable and can only be viewed through Internet Archive. Sir Roger Dodger (talk) 01:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 May 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please italicize Tinker Bell and the Lost Treasure at the top of the page. 45.72.232.52 (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk) 00:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Release Date History
[edit]Fall 2007 in 2005/2006. In 2007 Date moved into Fall 2008 with Blu-ray Debut? 145.255.11.1 (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- Unknown-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- C-Class Animated films articles
- Mid-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- C-Class Computer animation articles
- Low-importance Computer animation articles
- Computer animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class Disney articles
- Low-importance Disney articles
- C-Class Disney articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- Unknown-importance Animated films articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles