Talk:ThunderCats (1987 video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Train simulator (disambiguation) (3 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Revert?

Can I ask why the following was reverted? - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 13:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This obviously isn't going anywhere. The user who restored the gameguide junk is probably gone forever. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 01:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? What specifically was wrong with the content? It looks pretty reasonable to me. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 20:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. You asked why my edit was reverted, which implies that you agreed with it, yet you are now asking why the content was removed. To answer the latter, it's clearly gameguide material, including details about specific level structures, bonuses, and required in-game actions for success, so it's not suitable for inclusion. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My bad - phrased that poorly. I wanted to know why the revert occured, not why the revert was reverted. Oops. Why isn't that material worthy of inclusion? - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 12:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not suitable for inclusion because of the reason already stated in my previous comment. I don't know how to make what I said any clearer. As an administrator I'm assuming you're familiar with policy, so I suppose that you're disputing that the content removed qualifies as guide material? Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 01:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]