Talk:TeamTNT

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Ty Halderman message

Note, any future projects from TeamTNT are really not to be expected at this point.

We are only working on one project now, the Eternal DOOM IV: Return from Oblivion project. Quite frankly (and this is from Ty Halderman) TeamTNT is as close to dead as it will ever be. Even more frankly, I don't even have DOOM or any of its variants installed on my computer any more. Sorry folks, but life goes on. Email me via the TeamTNT web site if you're qualified and interested enough to carry on the (rather impressive, if I do say so) tradition.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.227.70.48 (talk • contribs).

Sources

Although I'm not sure if Doomworld qualifies as a WP:RS, I don't know of a more qualified site for Doom info: so if other users can vouch for it, that's fine. However, I will remove the MobyGames review as it appears to be user-submitted content. Marasmusine (talk) 09:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence seems to suggest that the Doomworld sources must be acceptable. How reliable a source is depends on context. Doomworld is widely acknowledged as a high-quality source for information on the Doom games within the Doom community and its authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. References to DoomWorld have been included in the article on Doom (video game) since 2001, and have survived no less than 4 FA reviews without being questioned. I'll look for a better ref than Mobygames for the fact referenced there. -Thibbs (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on TeamTNT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090502024119/http://www.teamtnt.com/teaminfo.htm to http://www.teamtnt.com/teaminfo.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813215516/http://www.teamtnt.com/ixet.htm to http://www.teamtnt.com/ixet.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090502024159/http://www.teamtnt.com/ixfuture.htm to http://www.teamtnt.com/ixfuture.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060921203906/http://www.gravitydesign.net/luc/ to http://www.gravitydesign.net/luc/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]