Talk:System Flaw

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (3 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

System Flaw

System Flaw was previously set to be a DSi retail title, however, it seems that Storm City Games has opted for it to be released on DSiWare instead rather than a full priced game. It shall cost 500 Points when it launches in Europe. System Flaw Recruit, as it is now known for DSiWare, is set to make use of the DSi's front camera to display your local surroundings. Players are then expected to turn around on the spot in order to take out the enemy sprites which are overlayed to make it seem like they are really there, similar to Ghostwire http://www.cubed3.com/news/13898 A Candela (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, it seems that it was released as a full game in the US, but shall be released in Europe as DSiWare under the name System Flaw Recruit. I'll add it to the article momentarily. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

All right. This is what we've got from WP:VG/RS:

I'm not particularly impressed by the quality of the sources, and think it would be fine redirected to an appropriate list. – czar 04:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]