Talk:Syphon Filter: Logan's Shadow
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Untitled
[edit]when will syphon filter logan 's shadow come to playstation 2.
story
[edit]Someone with this game update the Plot section... I do not Mujarimojo 05:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to play it this weekend. I'll get to it then. - Throw 12:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'll help as well. ShinraiTS4 18:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I started it but need help. Blackhawk45nrg 23:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- I am one of the few who have completed the story on Hard Mode and beat the bonus mission, Shadowed, which reveals many hidden clues within the plot. I have added a small section to the Plot to cover this (I didn't want to give too many details away). Exeneva 20:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- I started it but need help. Blackhawk45nrg 23:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'll help as well. ShinraiTS4 18:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, someone needs to update the section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.124.255 (talk) 23:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Censorship
[edit]The entire Censorship section needs citations and the following sentence makes no sense whatsoever: "Many of the sequels were given a "T" rating before those games shipped, and were given the "M" rating before the game shipped." MafiaCapo 00:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- LMFAO!!! I wrote that. Wow, what was I smoking?? Thanks for pointing that out, but damn, I really laughed hard after reading your comment. ShinraiTS4 21:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmm
[edit]I hope people help edit this and stuff. I don't feel like doing everything myself. T_T ShinraiTS4 20:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Overlong plot section.
[edit]The plot section is, quite simply, far too long. Please discuss the reasons for this here on the talk page. Plot sections should be concise, as set out in WP:PLOT. Just so no one can claim ignorance, a definition of 'concise' is available on wiktionary here. Reasons such as 'Other articles have long plot sections' are not applicable. By that rationale, other articles contain original research, so this one should too. Obviously this is a rather erroneous line of thinking. Thanks! Geoff B (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)