Talk:Stride & Prejudice
Stride & Prejudice was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 23, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
My recommendations
[edit]@Abryn: I think it would be better to use the app icon for the infobox and finding a gameplay screenshot to place in the gameplay section. In my humble opinion, I recommend a gif so people can have a good understanding of what the gameplay is. Unfortunately, I don't own an iPhone. If this came out on android, I can record the gameplay myself and create a gif out of it. I also can't find any video of the gameplay either. If you have any video footage available online, let me know and I'll create a gif for it.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 21:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sadly, I can't find any videos of the game. That said, it is available on Android. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Abryn: Unfortunately, i can't find it in the Google play store.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Huh. I could have sworn that I downloaded it. Must have dreamed that, haha. Oh well, thanks for offering to help in that area anyway. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- maybe it was delisted as i can't even find it in the Apple store.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Huh. I could have sworn that I downloaded it. Must have dreamed that, haha. Oh well, thanks for offering to help in that area anyway. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Abryn: Unfortunately, i can't find it in the Google play store.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Stride & Prejudice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
{{doing}} Look for a review at the end of this weekend. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Content:
- No apparent issues with stability and neutrality (4,5)
- There is a {{clarification needed}} tag that needs to be addressed.
- The reception section needs work. Right now it's just a laundry list of "Person X from Publication Y said Z" rather than synthesizing those critic opinions into something cohesive.
- I think the gameplay section could use a little more fleshing out. It's not made explicit that Elizabeth is running along the text, and until I dug into the sources I didn't really know that the running is automatic.
- Images::
- File:Stride and Prejudice.png has an improper fair use rationale; it's talking about the logo of the game but the logo is probably public domain as simple text, you have to justify using the splash screen/promo art/what have you.
- References::
- The big question to me is whether this topic at 650 words including the lead is broad enough for GA status. I'm inclined to think it's not at present; given that length isn't a concern there's more detail that could be added.
- A quick search for sources brought up [1][2][3] on the first page of Google results, and that's not checking News, Scholar, Books, or any library databases. I normally wouldn't think an exhaustive perusal of available sources is needed, but considering how short the article is I think you need proportionately more.
--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Will get to these soon. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
@David Fuchs: I'm gonna withdraw the GA for now, use what you said to help improve the article for a possible renomination. Thanks for the suggestions, it's much appreciated. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 17:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, good luck. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)