Talk:Stride & Prejudice/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content:
- No apparent issues with stability and neutrality (4,5)
- There is a {{clarification needed}} tag that needs to be addressed.
- The reception section needs work. Right now it's just a laundry list of "Person X from Publication Y said Z" rather than synthesizing those critic opinions into something cohesive.
- I think the gameplay section could use a little more fleshing out. It's not made explicit that Elizabeth is running along the text, and until I dug into the sources I didn't really know that the running is automatic.
Images::
- File:Stride and Prejudice.png has an improper fair use rationale; it's talking about the logo of the game but the logo is probably public domain as simple text, you have to justify using the splash screen/promo art/what have you.
References::
- The big question to me is whether this topic at 650 words including the lead is broad enough for GA status. I'm inclined to think it's not at present; given that length isn't a concern there's more detail that could be added.
- A quick search for sources brought up [1][2][3] on the first page of Google results, and that's not checking News, Scholar, Books, or any library databases. I normally wouldn't think an exhaustive perusal of available sources is needed, but considering how short the article is I think you need proportionately more.

@David Fuchs: I'm gonna withdraw the GA for now, use what you said to help improve the article for a possible renomination. Thanks for the suggestions, it's much appreciated. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 17:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]