Talk:Star Trek: Away Team

A fact from Star Trek: Away Team appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that reviewers compared the video game Star Trek: Away Team to games of the X-COM franchise?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Away Team.

Wikipedia

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (1 participant)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (3 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Ignoring the spelling/grammar for the moment: http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/913866.asp

--86.137.130.143 13:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"I changed the format layout of this page to match it to all the other pages on the Wikipedia. I also uploaded and added the front box picture for the game." - Lucky Foot

——

--KILNA 08:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a real-time strategy game, it's turn-based tactics game as described by other wikipedia articles... I've changed the categorization, etc. to match.

Relation to Fallout

I've heard that the codebases for Away Team and Fallout have a substantial amount in common, and may even use the same "engine". How much truth is there to this? 216.228.20.138 07:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from Away team

I can not understand why, when I clicked a "away team" wikilink in Communicator (Star Trek), I've been brought here by a redirect, to an article about a not so much known video game, instead of one which deals with "away team" meaning in Star Trek series (that is: the landing party), which is by far more known (even to not-Star Trek fan) and more notable. So, I can not understand this redirect. --79.21.150.43 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This is one of the worst redirects I've ever seen. I'm trying to rectify this problem. Viriditas (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much better with "away team" now going to the disambig page. Miyagawa (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As was pointed out in the earlier reversions, that is not "much better", but worse as WP:MALPLACED. The WP:RM that has finally been opened is much better, and (assuming it results in the move) then the dab can be rearranged. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're confusing proper redirects and dabs with a now deleted deletion discussion. The video game has never been the primary topic. Viriditas (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're confusing English words with whatever gave you that impression. I responded to "away team now going to the disambig page", a description of the WP:MALPLACED arrangement. -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense! Why does "away team" still redirect here, a week after the problem was identified and a fix was attempted? You have used the bureaucracy of Wikipedia to prevent editors from fixing the problem. This is unacceptable. Is it more important to follow procedure or to fix a glaring error? The policies are clear on this. Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]