Talk:Sports Car GT

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Melee (game terminology) (0 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Fair use rationale for Image:Sports Car GT Logo.JPG

Image:Sports Car GT Logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Useless info?

"A large community of editors has formed around SCGT, although it was never as large as that of Grand Prix Legends."

Is there any reason why it should be compared to the community of Grand Prix Legends? And anyway, I don't think there is a reliable source for that "fact" either. I think "although it was never as large as that of Grand Prix Legends" should be removed. Thoughts? Wes R. T —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Actually, after further reading the article, I'd say the above problem I mentioned is the least of this article's problems.--Wes Richards (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two different platforms

Please do point out in the re-written article that the two games by different developers for Microsoft Windows and PlayStation were received differently by critics, with the PC version being significantly better. For example, GameSpot, 8.2 vs 3.8. Currently the article only describes the PSX version in unnecessary detail.

-- J7n (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source

http://web.archive.org/web/20001215094300/http://www.gamesdomain.com:80/gdreview/depart/mar99/scgtint.html