Jump to content

Talk:Slime (Dragon Quest)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSlime (Dragon Quest) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

[edit]

I believe the original Red Slime was called suraimu-besu or "Slime Bess," and renamed She-Slime for the US DQ8.

list of slime types

[edit]

The original exhaustive list of slime types was removed by a previous editor, and I don't feel like getting into a revert war. Does anyone know of an off-site slime list we could link to? If not, and if I don't hear from the list's original author (I believe it's User:Caiyu), I'm going to post the list on my own website and link to it.

I put it back in for you because I think it belongs there. So I guess I really put it back in for everyone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.216.109.103 (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

slime types broken down by game

[edit]

I feel bad for the anonymous author who added a discussion of each slime's properties, only to have it immediately deleted! Yet I agree that this kind of depth may be inappropriate for an article on wikipedia. Would you be interested in having your content hosted on my website? I'm planning to add a section for slime info that isn't already available elsewhere. We can then link to it from the wikipedia article and have the info available to readers that way. Inhumandecency 22:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be me and I don't mind if you use it... I though it was better looking than the actual list. By the way for further reference, you can refer to me as "D"

A couple more slimes

[edit]

I believe there are more slimes than listed. For example, from the first Dragon Quest Monsters there is a slime known as the sap slime or treeslime. Another slime that is not on the list is a slime with one eye and it looks like a rock (it might be Granslime). Please add these if possible.Sciencegabe11 18:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Slimes

[edit]

There are alot of slimes missing from the list. I haven't played the games for a while, but some not on there are the one with the mohawk, the angel slime, the rock slime, the cyborg slime, the sap slime, and the coconut slime —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.209.4.247 (talk) 06:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category suggestions

[edit]
Fictional characters who can stretch themselves
Fictional characters who can fly
Fictional shapeshifters
Fictional characters who can change their size
Comments? - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When I think of Slimes, I don't really think of ones that can fly, but I like the other ones. I remember reading about how multiple Slimes can merge and become the King Slime in Nintendo Power a long time ago. That might be a good thing to explain in the article if it's not already in there. Evaunit♥666♥ 01:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dq template

[edit]

Should this article be on the DQ template? Evaunit♥666♥ 04:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would need a new category on the template, like "Misc" or "Concepts" or "Characters" or something. KiTA (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Slime (Dragon Quest)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JDC808 (talk · contribs) 16:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • "Originally inspired by the game Wizardry to be a weak and common monster for the Dragon Quest video game," Put video game before Dragon Quest.
  • "The characters popularity" -> "The character's popularity"
  • "protagonist of its own video game series." Is there a series article this could be linked to? If not, reword it to "protagonist of three Dragon Quest games." or however many its the protagonist of.

Character design

  • There's redundancy in the quote. "I was really hooked on 'Wizardy,' the PC game, and that's kind of where I got the inspiration for the Slime. There's...slime-looking characters [in 'Wizardry'], so I got the inspiration from it." Replace both strikes with elipses (...).
  • Last sentence, replace "He had" with "Horii". It's kind of confusing who "He" is until you get to the second half of the sentence.

Attributes

  • A couple of the long explanations in parenthesis for the different slimes could be trimmed.
  • Later on, this sentence "Friendly slimes would usually". Remove "would".

Appearances

  • "It made its first appearance" -> "The Slime made its first appearance"
  • Later in that same sentence, italicize Dragon Quest, and instead of games, change it to titles, or installments, or releases. Just something different so game isn't in the same sentence twice.
  • "it is an easy to recruit monster" -> "the monster is an easy recruit"
  • I have no idea what "Poof" does. Either a.) "learns a variety of indirect effect spells such as Poof," eliminate it, or b.) give a very brief example of what Poof does in parenthesis.
  • "The Slime is also the protagonist of its own spinoff games, Slime MoriMori Dragon Quest" Put "beginning with" or "which began with" before the title of the game.
  • "It was followed by Dragon Quest Heroes: Rocket Slime, which was released worldwide, for the Nintendo DS." Remove comma after worldwide.
  • The infobox at the bottom of the page has a third slime game, but it's not listed here.
  • "These games follow a nation of slimes who are intelligent, and civilized," Remove comma after intelligent.

Influences and analysis

  • "Some have seen the slime" Who is "some"? Reviewers?
  • Second sentence, italicize Dragon Quest.
  • Next sentence, "it's easy to beat," -> "how its easy to defeat"
  • Same sentence, italicize Dragon Quest.
  • Next sentence, GamesRadar is one word.
  • Same sentence, italicize Dragon Quest.
  • Same sentence, "exposed players to slimes many times over, and a positive association was created by their familiarity." -> "exposed players to an abundance of slimes, but a positive association was created by their familiarity." OR if "many times over" is used in the source, just quote that.
  • "but "simple" so it is accessible to anyone." -> "but "simple", being accessible to anyone."

Cultural impact

  • Merchandise
    • First sentence, space issue "inDragon"
    • "It now has their own" -> "It now has its own"
    • Italicize the name of the boardgame instead of quotes.
  • Reception
    • In the sentence beginning with GamesRadar, there's a beginning quotation mark, but no end quotation. Where does the quote end?
    • Throughout the article make sure you're consistent on where "Slime" should be capitalized, as well as italicizing game titles.
    • I'll check sources when the above is done. --JDC808 18:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the through review so far! I fixed everything you found, and created a new section and sentence. I am no clear on what to do about the word slime though, when to capitalize it. From the interview, the creator refers to "Slime" the character, but multiple "slimes" are usually lowercase. Does that sound right? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that sounds right, I've went through and done some minor copy-editing (a couple things I missed in above review) and I think I got the correct usage of when to capitalize it. If you think I might have incorrectly capitalized some, feel free to change it. New section is good. I took away the parenthesis of the descriptions of slimes. I also took care of overlinking (Dragon Quest was linked a lot) and provided some wikilinks for better understanding. --JDC808 04:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources GA reviews don't require extensive source reviews, so I'm not gonna check every source to make sure the info is correct. I'll leave that to FAC if you take it there, but I trust you've taken care of that. I'll just check format.

  • With a handy quick tool, I went ahead and made date formats consistent. I did month/day/year (e.g January 1, 2013), unless you prefer a different format.
  • I assume you're using cite web for all of your online sources? If so, make sure the work and publisher (aka owner) fields are filled out. The owner can be found on the work's Wikipedia page (e.g. IGN's owner is J2 Global). If it's independent, only put the publisher field. If there's not a Wikipedia page, look at the bottom of the source's page for the copy-right symbol and put that company name.
  • Ref #1: Mtv -> MTV.
  • Ref #3: there should be a space between "(2004).Dragon" --space after period
  • Ref #9: Games Radar one word
  • Ref #12: Gamespy -> GameSpy
  • Ref #13: Gamesradar -> GamesRadar
  • Ref #16: link Amazon.com, and if you can find another source, that would be better (because it's a shop).
  • It's not required and you can do this whenever, but archiving all of the online sources would be best. Some are already archived. --JDC808 04:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, publishers should all be there, and I replaced the amazon link with a news article. Also, I found the article had three dead links I replaced, and in the process expanded the merchandise section. Let me know if there is anything else! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. There's just a few minor things. Ref #4, 7, and 14, the publisher and work are exactly the same. When this is the case, you only need the publisher. Ref# 8, 12, 20, and 21, GamesRadar publisher is Future plc. Ref# 13 and 17, capitalize Joystiq. Ref# 5, wikilink Game Revolution. --JDC808 01:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok all set! Anything else? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Great job. This is a nice article. --JDC808 02:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Slime (Dragon Quest). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Slime (Dragon Quest). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Slime (Dragon Quest). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]