Talk:Shadowrun Chronicles: Boston Lockdown

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Is it really an MMO?

I did not found anything (official) that say it's a MMO.

They only talk about smaller scale Shadowruns in an online environment. The only MMO talk i found was non official speculation.

Does anyone know more ablaut it? I don't want to edit anything, because it failed a Google search. 95.88.83.231 (talk) 04:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to edit. --Niemti (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion

Considering lack of update since 2013 (with the exception of "Needs Expansion" notices) the entire article should be deleted as unnoteworthy. Nobody is going to expand on this. Be Bold! Cuvtixo (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid deletion rationale. You're free to nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD, but considering the Metacritic source already in the article shows it received significant coverage in the form of reviews from IGN, Gamespot, and Eurogamer, it's pretty likely to not be deleted due to meeting the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 19:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Additionally, I agree with Lightkeydarkblade that you recent removals of section headers were inappropriate. -- ferret (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've already responded to you on my talk page. Your previous edits on the page (including one that removed a sourced statement on the game serving shutting down on the basis of "anti-advertising") were effectively the opposite of helping the page to improve. Your proposal of deletion gives me the impression that you just want the page to be deleted without any valid reasoning. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 10:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned user draft

Please would an interested editor assess the unused independent draft at User:McDougle/sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 20:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]