User talk:Cuvtixo

Welcome!

Hello, Cuvtixo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

--ArmadniGeneral 21:00, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that I reverted your edit to the page Longshoreman, because, as the information is already present at the page it reverts to, Wikipedia seeks to avoid duplicate pages. This can lead to two pages on the same subject containing different but still encyclopedic information. Redirects are used to maintain consistency. --ArmadniGeneral 21:00, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HighwayCompanionCover.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HighwayCompanionCover.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plasmodium falciparum

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Please see Wikipedia:External_links#How to link on how to make links in articles. In the Plasmodium falciparum "Sources and further reading" section, I had to revert some of your edits, since they converted correctly formatted links into ones that showed raw web addresses (http://www....). It's no big deal, but I'm just letting you know for future reference.

Happy editing!

Have a great day!!!

WriterHound (talk) 19:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble in Mind(album)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trouble in Mind(album), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Trouble in Mind. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AARD code edits

I have just been reviewing your recent edits to the Windows 3.1x page and I have some doubts about them. I have left them in place for the time being but I would appreciate your thoughts to the comments I have left on the article talk page. CrispMuncher (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick ping on this. I left some comments on the article talk page several days ago and you haven't responded. It occurred to me maybe you weren't watching it and needed a message here to notice. CrispMuncher (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heathkit computers

Please have a look at the article History of personal computers where the significance of the Heathkit machines is currently under discussion. I note you contributed the text for the Heath systems back in 2007. Thanks. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lowfield Heath

Hi, and thanks for your comments here. I have responded there, and would appreciate your thoughts. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 20:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AmazinSpidermanObama.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AmazinSpidermanObama.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin

Hello, the plaigarism section does not need to be a laundry list of songs the allegedly plaigarised. It should just be a summary and the individual allegations should go in the pages for those songs/albums. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 03:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC) However, Page's defenses are included, and yet fall short of explanation, especially of contemporary, non-blues songs and singers. I think, objective a "laundry list" would speak for itself. A list of simple original song titles and artists could be included without explanation. Cuvtixo (talk) 03:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're free to remove them, but I think his defences are notable to include because they show that he recognizes the fact that these allegations are out there. I'm not taking a side, I have no opinion, I just think the section needs to be short and not turned into a big list. It's the main article, so it should be a sumnmary and you can add individual cases to the song articles where more attention and detail can be given. Also, the page needs to remain neutral and having a huge list of allegations - but no defences - goes against that (I'm not saying the current version is perfectly neutral, you're free to remove anything you like). -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 04:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving it as is. A Wikipedia article seems ideal to gather links to a number of songs, establishing a Modus Operendi. In fact its tempting to start a new article on Led Zeppelin Suspected Cases of Plagiarism! Really an even better place was YouTube, but a number of videos comparing songs and lyrics have been taken down because of music label's complaints of copyright violation (That's irony for you!) Cuvtixo (talk) 03:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Financial Times letter to the Editor February 21 2009

Wikipedians Like to Live Dangerously

Published: February 21 2009 02:00 | Last updated: February 21 2009 02:00

From Mr Christopher Daniels.

Sir, “The wisdom of nerds” (editorial, February 14) was such an awful piece of fluff, I hate to dignify it with a response.

Do I not see FT “Corrections” just across the page? Anyone with a grasp of logic will understand that being easily editable also means easily correctable. Does the “wisdom of crowds” being “conventional” mean that Wikipedia is a Tory conspiracy and that I can only trust it for Star Wars trivia? Wikipedia’s strength, compared with conventional encyclopedias and newspapers, is that I don't have to wait for (or buy) a new edition with corrections.

I think I prefer “dangerous” Wikipedia over very snarky, unsigned FT editorials, thank you very much.

Christopher Daniels, Wikipedian, Arlington, MA, US

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009

Vote for CC license

Welcome Cuvtixo!

Thank you for voting.

If you wish, you may retain the following receipt as evidence of your vote:

SPID: 14094

BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

hQQOAzWmQkC5j9heEA/9EnFuWXHagmX/iH8Lab0NDqOIJ7kcbxPR01UiclI+ZOAp kaPQupkhLLqe0orP8mncMUC3hLdwOb1feb362+U3bYAS5XeyWZUoJGHLNCh5AL6g N+kLQjTcUmy/645RiCguLpB6JCBma+LuJfENCdIYdPfQa0NZ/sficIH+sZnv6JPX WQvzpU5zfXJSiIVaNhS8GZSlgTFOEHRKtd+JkUQziPw4sHPZEKHS7EqHvPbwm9tw 1dS0hhaDgpIxZb0/DQO7Bxn+/tTq3zpfawmyIVEXIk7ztvyPjFVbvGIazCa74Ta+ kIqOxr+Xcpae9t+F3dKQMSl2q3uq4iGB0zZpwnBmTZU122CC3u1chdenlvJiPxjw p7R6B9XwbCSrEvxMHUoo46qxdl6KxGLx61gHeIqfC/M9ataVChir95fE+gqNZDc9 NBzeTb56s6ZXOJ0W1XVCMX56Lt7SgFPhOgmdzhUGcRH8b4eb+fPO+QQ2HeghdcXV B+XWZ/4N5xY9a2GeEZtcAsMoyjpX5l3UMYcCmC6L4VYwL9B0p9F44T6LTTaZAzDF 7w7unzLwtx4Bts0jPhb05Lo6oXfuEim1LF42KY9/woqTq38is1DScTAoZ6OQHyjR d7/YReGu0hxTRSrg5d4rUgZMOCuukZOzNd03ScZJiqY3dB6J5OGSOQfwCX1lA7QP /jbm9xsSy8cTK+qwM5sIBddkkSPFHQRbhTIlrBbTd5f+cZZHwoiR9ZR6FETyMIwc euLPFnaWqHcnv3PFe50ZOA3LnPD/NXEPtoPVtoQeDMm1TUMlpz6Su8JVurR6xFLs OxvFeCVbKZl3Gs+/Qj3zWctHJfcvBGeXTiVTr15O4lWDmOwNUxVfo0tNakYbaDHJ 6ZNL8ocamBz/QOjLBCqtuagdIYhkHHcNGNN2XFzx3PIzsk0jZWg0bOUvNv3mv/2l u7T+YFGj6JCAOomTR/oIDC033ILNBzlhrewV2QgeI/j2gRN7eI48gKBU5FB2llwr uucLSIJjREUQscU9qK++jochOFOsSgI43jJRNCjYzfDo+TQtV0RFmucbgGMJDX6Y rU9GeLn+aveNDArUWHOoUkEBlcwVGSN8siWsrHPrO5irt2Q65D9+y8VZGUjsE9oM p/E9g55CnHPKEMbkKEO3VVp44xefaGOP/ZWI9F+m4olztA/ewtHFdiU4kesTyc0e aoKdJ8rRizElfejS/cNCdFy4gBfAqGvnO0T7BRSShb4H5VzM9vd7wQGSwg+VvGwj jmzQ91np1hgr6Wht6gczKzfb2Nq1Y1vC5VP3C2KaE2HsvXFJH+L/iWB8YhMtZXEt CLjZxY/MkWgc/EqKSvscELre7YdJo9aJo8RiOmd3xuXS0pkBnPhr4RxLZay4E143 o9dF6STv5pkSSX2lFEPZzVVmyDGpccrNFB8MJJrNqSMiI7v4RAiHQtoPb0PU0IoA UNPh4m+4mpiv/vTFOjzR7jsotZ7AV168seiS16drksVQalLbNvlS12vAPkrFoPyb 03Po+5kCjcsMtJ3Z74mB4+GJrL+R/d3GYCnw8W3b3Hga9mLxBpkQipNbLXI= =2T9e

END PGP MESSAGE-----

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with Little Lyford Pond Lodge, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Eugene Krabs (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Had enough for now

I can't believe the above accusation! I've had one invitation to collaborate on an article (from someone who also had material unfairly deleted) several bots takedown pictures, one announced intention of deletion, but several articles/contributions deleted with no attempt to contact me or communicate. I've had it with Wikipedia. I've quit before and returned, because I have a pretty empty, meaningless life, and there's not really an alternative to Wikipedia that has been widely adopted. I guess I should have involved myself with a "wikiclique" of some sort. Bummer. Cuvtixo (talk) 01:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Antibiotic resistance#Role of animals

Hi. I noticed you made considerable changes to this section a year and a half ago. This section has some POV problems and rambles a on. I'm considering trimming it a lot or removing it entirely. I would appreciate your input on the talk page. Pdcook (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HighwayCompanionCover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HighwayCompanionCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:07, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rubin&ed.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rubin&ed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories copyright violation

Material you added to the above article was copied from http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/17/trump-ally-alex-jones-doubles-down-sandy-hook-conspiracy-theories/214524, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cuvtixo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hardened Gentoo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hardened Gentoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardened Gentoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... ( seems nominator has not notified you) 05:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cuvtixo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cuvtixo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11276294

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:53, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portable computer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyperion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at PC Master Race, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Not really sure what this is all about, but please be sure to follow WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. That comment was neither. Sergecross73 msg me 18:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you threatened to block my account a year ago.WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL yourself. Hiding behind wikipedia rules does not allow you to make threats. Yes, I'm abrupt. I'm just making my feelings known without using wikipedia rules as a weapon, as you do.

I don't recall ever threatening to block you. I don't even recall seeing your name before I noticed your rude comment on Ferret's talk page today. So you'll have to refresh my memory on that one. But regardless, in a general sense, informing editors that they may be blocked from editing because they're not following the rules is not generally a NPA/CIVIL issue. Saying "screw you" is. Sergecross73 msg me 18:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Ferret here. I actually do have the "authority" to block you. I am not sure why you've chosen today, nearly a year later, to make such statements in my direction though. If you do not want to receive warnings in the future, then do not edit disruptively with unexplained reverts. Please read the warning and heed WP:BRD in the future. -- ferret (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Your edit to Duck and cover has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 14:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please.this is just an attack at this point. Or, a dare to attract more attention from the corrupt foundation. I may consider it thus Cuvtixo (talk) 18:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pantothenic acid

I restored the sentence you removed, with a valid reference. David notMD (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. you may notice I have multiple attacks from Dianna, who accuses me of copyright violations, when I have made efforts to re-word everything I don't have in short quotes of a sentence of two. citations made. Your goodwill does not make up for the growing hatred I have of this organization. Cuvtixo (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa's talk page

She's right about 99% of the time. If, unlikely but possible, she's been wrong in your case, deal with it like a grownup. Anything like that again, and I'll just block you from editing. You're harassing her. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]