Jump to content

Talk:Secret of Mana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSecret of Mana is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starSecret of Mana is part of the Mana series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 4, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2014Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
August 11, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Coming to iOS devices

[edit]

Coming to iOS devices --Aizuku (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the Mana games are set in the same continuity? Its getting quite confusing to keep track. Can you mark which one are set in the same continuity from the following? And their chronology as well: Final Fantasy Adventure - Secret of Mana — Seiken Densetsu 3 — Legend of Mana — Sword of Mana - Children of Mana - Friends of Mana — Dawn of Mana - Heroes of Mana — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.93.197.164 (talk) 12:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the Mana games are set in the same continuity? Its getting quite confusing to keep track. Can you mark which one are set in the same continuity from the following? And their chronology as well: Final Fantasy Adventure - Secret of Mana — Seiken Densetsu 3 — Legend of Mana — Sword of Mana - Children of Mana - Friends of Mana — Dawn of Mana - Heroes of Mana If you don't know the answer can you refer to anyone who can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.93.197.164 (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Famitsu

[edit]

If you're interested in the Famitsu review, it's in issue 243 I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response czar ♔ 12:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]

Congratulations to all the contributors to this featured article. You deserve a lot of applause, recognition and appreciation. What a wonderful article.

  Bfpage |leave a message  19:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emulated ports in the infobox

[edit]

@PresN: Per the infobox guidelines, emulated ports without any changes (Virtual Console, PSN, some of the mobile releases) are not to be listed in the infobox. "The unabbreviated console or operating system for which the game was specifically developed. This includes dedicated ports, but not games in emulation or services." If the mobile ports added/removed/changed anything, then it's not a direct emulated version, and deserves to stay. The VC version is a straight up ROM of the SNES version, so it doesn't belong.

I also removed the Mobygames and official mobile site in the external links, per WP:ELNO and WP:VG/EL which states "Only the English version of the page should be included if there are multiple languages, per WP:NONENGEL, WP:ELMINOFFICIAL." Don't see how this is a personal style if I'm just trying to follow guidelines. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 04:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The EL thing is fine. Removing emulations is fine. The mobile ports were not emulated, they were ported- I don't know the particulars about the JP phone version (other than that it wasn't an emulator), but the iOS/Android versions had changes and graphical updates, as mentioned in the article itself (and again, were not emulated). You also removed a period from a full-sentence caption, and most importantly, ripped bits out of the lead that you didn't like. --PresN 06:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, but listing personnel in prose in the lead doesn't violate any guidelines, but it's not something we normally do on game articles, even other FA ones. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Secret of Mana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Secret of Mana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Secret of Mana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split remake into its own article

[edit]

Seeing how there is a great abundance of coverage about the remake, I see no reason why it shouldn't have its own article. It clearly meets WP:GNG, and lets not forget that two of the three remakes from the original game already have their own articles. Alt (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a bunch of development and reception info about the remake specifically, that's reasonable- it's fairly analogous to the Adventures of Mana version of SD1. It's finding dev info that's tricky (I haven't looked) - reviews are one thing, but if all we have are reviews then we should just expand the reception section. --PresN 16:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Secret_of_Mana&oldid=1247110416"