Talk:Sacco & Vanzetti (1971 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

19 Nov 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
15 Nov 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Redirects for discussion

07 Nov 2024 – Pauletta Brupbakher (talk · edit · hist) →Paulette Brupbacher was RfDed by Fram (t · c); see discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

01 Oct 2024 – Draft:Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c) was moved to Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) by Soman (t · c) on 15 Nov 2024

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (514)

Requested move 23 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film), '06 film moved to Sacco and Vanzetti (2006 film). Jenks24 (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– I was going to propose "Sacco and Vanzetti (documentary film)" for the 2006 film, but I guess consistency by year is more suitable. ~~(EDIT: I found out many official English sources use ampersand for the 1971 film.)~~ See below. George Ho (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support both for the English wiki.--Froglich (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Froglich: I can be wrong about usage on the 1971 film. --George Ho (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support both but not sure about the ampersand, if we are going to use the Italian, why muddle it? Pincrete (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pincrete: How about Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film) ([1][2][3][4]) or Sacco and Vanzetti (1971 film) ([5]? Sources use both per source: [6][7][8] Since usage is divided per WP:UE, you can pick whatever feels most comfortable to you. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support either 'e' or 'and' … it is hard to see which is most used for the film (many of these examples are talking about the case). My feeling was that no one was going to type '&' in a search box. I don't know what policy is about the use of '&' in titles. Pincrete (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a policy but a guideline: WP:& says that '&' can be used in article titles and proper nouns but must be normally avoided elsewhere. George Ho (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. Clear consensus to move, we just need to decide with of e/&/and to use for the 1971 film. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep e, add (1971 film) In ictu oculi (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Expanded article

I've expanded this article, and deleted its stub status. Most of the new information for the expansion came from the German Wikipedia page Sacco und Vanzetti (film). I've followed the naming conventions agreed earlier on this page, so that

Sacco e Vanzetti is used for the film
Sacco and Vanzetti is used when talking about the characters
Sacco & Vanzetti is used in the external link to the iTunes page because that's what they're calling the film.

I'm still in the process of writing a 'Synopsis' section which I should hopefully have complete by the end of this week. Flourbomb (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]