Talk:SCP – Containment Breach

Three comments

One: the plot section is too detailed.

Two: Don't you think the original site (or at least the concept of the SCPs) deserves a clearer mention than just one sentence in the lead section (and a couple in text references)? I mean, I know it's obscure and doesn't quite get enough media attention to get its own article, but given the fact that the game and many of its elements are straigh derivatives of the stories on the site, it deserves a bit more explicit recognition. 201.190.31.192 (talk) 06:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Three: Apparent signs of bias. "And it is a scary game not to be played if you are under the age of 8 because of how scary it is. Also check out the unity remake of the game." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.244.130.31 (talk) 07:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Expansion

This article is missing quite a few important citations that identify its sources and should be added into the article. Also The reception section is way too short and needs to be expanded with more reviews added to it.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Expansion and Missing Information

This article has several sections that need to be expanded including more information on the game's reception. The article is also missing information on its development (it was inspired by the game SCP-087), and its release (when and where it was first released, and its constant updates). These few missing pieces of information are important and should be added to the article as well as more information on the game's reception with more critical reviews on the game.--Paleface Jack (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Unity

Yesterday, I (under an IP address) added a citation needed tag to the unity remake section. Today, I see that it has been replaced by a citation to the creator's Patreon page. I would argue that this does not constitute a reliable source as it is user-generated content which could easily be heavily exaggerated. Besides, who is 'Zornor90' and is the project supported by the original creator? --Wodgester (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

The Unity port has little to no reason to be mentioned on this page. Besides being irrelevant to the game, there aren't any sources to cite for it to justify its inclusion on this page -- CommanderMark (talk) 18:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Fix this page-

I don't know who did it but some idiot/jerk edited a good portion of the page- instead of being about some paranormal horror game or whatever like it is, they edited everything from its gameplay to its details about it being some "Super Sex Fest" (which is their abbreviations for "SCP" which doesn't match at all) and so forth. I never write in wikipedia so I wouldn't know where to begin fixing it, but even then I wouldn't fix anything- what I thought was just the opening summary of the page, it turns out they edited a good portion of the entire page to make the game out to be some sexy 3D porn game or some crap. Idk if it was just rumors or not but I heard you can ban people from the website based on their IP address, and even if its not the case, whoever wrote all that deserves to be blocked from the site for a multitude of reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.66.15 (talk) 23:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

This formatting for this article is broken.

The article is, putting it bluntly, formatted poorly. Most notably, the content for the page is duplicated 5 times and the entire article is italicized due to a writing error. Attempts to reverse the changes have been undone twice under claims of vandalism, once by a bot and again by another user. --I am Proto, your security is my motto. (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources

In the gameplay section, the only reliable source for the character being named "Benjamin Oliver Walker" and being a former Level 4 Senior Researcher is a YouTube Video. I'm going to check around for news sources or other credible areas and if I can't find any I will remove the clarification. If you were to re-add it please place it in the Plot section. Rafplayz001 (talk) 18:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Why does the article/infobox platform keep changing to consoles with no sources?

36.74.41.11 (talk · contribs), can you please say why you keep changing the game release platform to Xbox Series X and Playstation? AFAIK, it is a PC-exclusive game. Rafplayz001 (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

It's a troll. Please don't feed it. IceWelder [✉] 18:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

"Femur Breaker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Femur Breaker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 26#Femur Breaker until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your game download s don't work

Downloads don't work. 71.213.1.245 (talk) 15:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Unreferenced information

Right now, there is a lot of unreferenced information in the Gameplay section, towards the point where even years past versions of the page were cleaner with more citations. Later today/this week I'll try to rewrite these sections to trim unreferenced information, since there's a lot of detail gathered through what seems to be original research. If there are any objections to edits I have made please reply with them here. Rafplayz001^{(talk | contribs)} 14:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Gone ahead and contributed my changes. Later I'll try and find sources since we're lacking in those right now. Rafplayz001^{(talk | contribs)} 17:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Regarding a Review Inbox

I think that having a reviews inbox would improve the quality of the article vastly.

Having an inbox for reviews in the Reviews Section would declutter a very hard section to read.

I think that people who would like to see this article would like to be able to view reviews quickly and easily.

I'll try editing a info box for reviews. Spodogo (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)