Talk:Risen (video game)
Classification Refusal in Australia
[edit]I've added a section on the OFLC's classification refusal for Australia. Here's a few links for the info I found if anyone wants to follow the story (that, and I'm not sure that Kotaku qualifies as a reliable source): Kotaku
Bigpond Games article (taken from another source I think)
Cheers, ABVS1936 (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]"Risen's gameplay is very similar to the Gothic series (also developed by Piranha Bytes).". If someone has reliable sources for that sentence, please provide it here on discussion page, Sir Lothar (talk) 08:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm. Does the IGN Review count? (That's a serious question. I've seen enough clueless reviews in major publications to not regard reviews as necessary 'reliable'.)
- If it does count, we could probably quote from the 2nd paragraph. Something like:
- An IGN reviwer wrote that Risen resembles the Gothic games in "the general ambiance of the world[,] the presentation, feel of gameplay, and style of exploration" but is more "user-friendly" than the "more hardcore Gothic games".
- Improvements welcome, of course. Cheers, CWC 12:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm, I think it's a good idea. We could put something like that in gameplay section :). Sir Lothar (talk) 06:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Pictures to illustrate the article
[edit]On June 30, I swapped the existing image to illustrate the article (game cover box image) with the game official logo for which I got the publisher's approval to use it under share-alike 3.0 licence. On July 1, Aspects reversed to the illustration of the game cover box image. So on July 17, I edited the article to have the best of the worlds, i.e. containing both illustrations. I hope this makes everybody happy. --André Feroi (talk) 13:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Order of sections
[edit]This probably isn't very important, but almost every other video game article has 'gameplay' before 'plot'. Should they be swapped around here, or does it not matter? --Luck + (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Risen (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090312042341/http://www.virgin-lands.com:80/vl.php to http://www.virgin-lands.com/vl.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151207003426/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDqgpnVEgiU to //www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDqgpnVEgiU
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100202225203/http://www.lemonaut.at:80/lcog/ to http://www.lemonaut.at/lcog/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)