Talk:Remilia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Video games: Esports Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the esports task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (6 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.

If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://lol.gamepedia.com/Remilia. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Nnadigoodluck (talk) 12:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The text in question is available under CC BY-SA 3.0. On the bottom of the Leaguepedia website it says, "Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Game content and materials are trademarks and copyrights of their respective publisher and its licensors." The text is not "game content [or] materials" and is written by wiki editors; it is not copyrighted by anyone, the same way Wikipedia's content (for the most part) is not. I also included an attribution in the bottom to clarify this and to follow the relevant terms of the license. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical articles are useless without birth names

This person was not born "Maria". Concepts like "deadnaming" are anathema to actual history. Either they assumed a "stage name" or did a legal name change. Either way, any proper biography was factually identify the persons' actual identity. 70.163.147.152 (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@70.163.147.152: From MOS:GENDERID: "Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography § Changed names calls for mentioning the former name of a transgender person if they were notable under that name." Even if you disagree with this guideline, Creveling's birth name has never been released publicly, so there are no reliable sources that could verify one and warrant its inclusion. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is nobody concern what her birth name was. Including it on description would be disrespectful and also useless, since she had legally changed her name years ago (your apportation would be valid in case her legal name was missing, for instance, and we had only have her nickname). But in that case, it is completely irrelevant to know, since it would be the same as wanting to include her favourite color or dish, but difference is that this information would be, even though completely prescindible, not offensive to post; unlike the birth name of a transgender person, which would be both.

Thank you for the apportation and hope mine is clear as well. SinglewingedAngel (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Death references

Shouldn't the death fact refer to the tweet by Richard Lewis? The articles that are the references now all just refer to the same tweet, so why not cut out the middleman? Citing news sources does not increase credibility over using their source directly. It was like that before: revision 932889717 Richard Lewis' tweet Džuris (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Džuris: Richard Lewis' tweet does not mention details in the sentence that are verified by the other sources listed, specifically how and at what age she passed away. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be useful to perhaps add some more information on the topic, since health problems were not specified nor the conditions she was facing in the event. Nevertheless, speculation should be avoided in order to be respectful, as there is yet nothing confirmed about the death cause itself (it would be good to mention this as well).

Thank you SinglewingedAngel (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]