Talk:Raymond (Animal Crossing)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Raymond (Animal Crossing)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 16:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 12:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 12:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin Here are my comments, hope they can be addressed! Arconning (talk) 14:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

• Mentions of "amiibo" should be written as "Amiibo". Even if it's stylized as all lowercase, it should be written as the latter as it's a proper noun. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Trademarks
• Wikilink mentions of LGBT community to LGBT community.

Lead and infobox

• New Horizons and subsequently, New Horizons and be subsequently
• He also appears in the manga adaptation of New Horizons,, remove comma.
• his personality, appearance, and his willingness, remove the second his.
• currency and items, as well as real money., remove comma.
• him popular in the LGBT community., him popular with the LGBT community.
• His popularity also led to backlash from people over the strong attachment., the strong attachment of what?

Concept and creation

• No issues.

Appearances

• Raymond first appeared in the 2020 Animal Crossing: New Horizons, Raymond first appeared in 2020 in Animal Crossing: New Horizons.
• can be a resident, suggest rewording as can be residents.
• or having him, add by after or.
• the player can interact with Raymond by talking to him, giving gifts, and more., instead of using more use a wording such as the player can interact with Raymond using actions such as talking to him, gifting gifts, and ...[another action]. Could put at least three examples rather than letting the reader guess using "more".

  I've elected to just leave it at these two, as there really isn't a third thing that is nearly comparable to the other two in terms of significance in the game. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Reception and promotion

• identified as a standout member, add he was at the start.
• Mentions of Tumblr Sexymen and Tumblr Sexyman, should have the second word uncapitalized.
• Wikilink mention of the word "bisexual", "NME", and "Photoshop".

Images

• Images have fair-use licenses which makes sense. Pass.

Refs

• Earwig seems okay.
• Random reference checks: Refs 1, 2, 8, 12, 16, 23, and 26, good. Conditional pass on the Screen Rant source, as it's used sparingly.

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information (especially the last section), neutral.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I believe I have addressed all issues. How's it look now? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)