Talk:Radeon R300 series
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
ATI cleanup
[edit]This page is part of my ATI cleanup, and grouping technology by core, along the lines the NVIDIA pages are divided. Timharwoodx 17:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
The model overview table should be moved to the general Radeon page. xerces8
--86.61.47.221 21:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nah that would just be way too much information for that single page. Every generational page has its own table and it would just add up to be monstrous.--Swaaye 06:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Overheating and failures
[edit]High-clocked chips with R300 core have short lifespan. Reports from various bulletin boards claim that those cards permanently fail after approximately 2 years of use.‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› [citation needed]
I added a {{fact}} to the preceding, but then I decided to remove it because I dislike FUD. I'm putting it here so that if anyone wants to substantiate this claim, they can put it back with a citation rather that just reverting. Simon80 20:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
ITs true i had a 9700TX (Dell OEM) that died after about 2 years Candle 86 03:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Update
[edit]This Page is in need of update, as many new models have been introduced along the X**00 line In both Mobility and Normal settings.
- No it isn't. Wrong family. Xxxx is R520 series.
RV370
[edit]This is a great page, informative and well organized. I did notice, however, that the RV370 appears in the table, but its distinction from the RV380 is never addressed in the text of the article. MaxEnt 18:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- RV370 = RV360 in 110nm without Low-K (easier and cheaper to produce, Low-End products); RV380 = RV370 with native PCIe interface --Denniss 00:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
AGP
[edit]Let's add a column to the table about AGP version supported by R300 chips. Alecv 21:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Nah... All of them are AGP 8X except for the PCIe boards and that's already displayed. The table is already too wide.--Swaaye 00:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
X600
[edit]X600 SE Mobility is a quite common card on laptops. I think it should be added.
Flip-chip packaging
[edit]"One major change with the manufacturing of the core was the use of the flip chip packaging, a technology not used previously on video cards."
This part of the article is not true! Matrox' Parhelia-512 graphics processor also used flip-chip packaging before the actual R300 debut. In fact, an unreleased 3D game accelerator line from Real3D was using flip-chip ASICs way back in the mid-90's. --Fellix 15:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fellix (talk • contribs)
Credits
[edit]Some information coming from R420 was added to the article today. Freewol (talk) 08:13, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ATi Radeon R300 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?print=1&article_id=57179&cat_id=560 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517011758/http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/R3xx_3D_Registers.pdf to http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/R3xx_3D_Registers.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ATi Radeon R300 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060118025659/http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/chipcomp/ to http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/chipcomp/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)