Talk:Pokémon Diamond and Pearl

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pokémon Diamond and Pearl article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Pokémon Diamond and Pearl" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Pokémon Diamond and Pearl has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 15, 2005	Articles for deletion	Kept
August 19, 2006	Articles for deletion	Speedily kept
February 4, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
February 11, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
May 9, 2007	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
October 28, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
November 24, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
January 25, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
June 16, 2009	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
July 5, 2024	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

Video games: Nintendo Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Bejeweled Stars (1 participant)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

"Pokemon platinum; Looker" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon platinum; Looker. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Surf Elite Four Glitch" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Surf Elite Four Glitch. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Pokemon diamond cheats" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pokemon diamond cheats. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20#Pokemon diamond cheats until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 18:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beta

A few months ago, the beta of Pokemon Diamond and Pearl has been leaked, revealing many sprites of what some gen 4 pokemon use to look like. Should we add this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The great Jay (talk • contribs) 01:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Tiagaga" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tiagaga and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Tiagaga until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Shimucchi" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Shimucchi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Shimucchi until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 15:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potential GA demotion

This 2007 promotion (last reviewed in 2009) does not seem to meet the criteria. I have tagged several areas in the article where more sourcing is needed. The subsections of Legacy also need to be expanded or merged together. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Pokémon Diamond and Pearl

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: No consensus to delist ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed tags and after a quick skim you will see other places that aren’t tagged but deserve cn tags. Also there are 2 maintenance tags but both are about expansions. 48JCLTALK 01:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be willing to work on improvements to the article in order for it to comply with Good Article standards. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@48JCL I've fixed up the spots needing expansion and additionally cited several sections with citation needed tags (As well as Pokémon Platinum's section). Could you clarify what other spots need improvement? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Could [1] be moved to the body, making the lead more summary style? I’ll come back with more. 48JCL TALK 21:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@48JCL what else needs to be done? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.