User talk:The great Jay

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi The great Jay! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:31, Tuesday, March 9, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Article Talk pages

I recommend looking at an article's Talk page before looking to add or subtract from the article. Sometimes there has already been a discussion about the change you have in mind, and a consensus reached on what to do. Also, Featured article (five-pointed star, upper right corner) and good articles (green circle with cross in middle) will have watchers who are touchy about change (although they should not act as they 'own' the article). Good luck editing. David notMD (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing content from article talk pages

It is not acceptable to removed other editors’ comments from talk pages like you did here. You can remove your own comments if no one has responded to them, but you should not alter talk pages when other editors have responded. See WP:TALK. I am not going to reinstate the section but wanted to make you aware. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, now Im kinda afraid of you now. I'll revert my edit. Blue Jay (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to revert your edit; as I mentioned, I am not going to reinstate it, and am not concerned, but just wanted you to know about the normal routine. To provide you an example of why/how such edits affect other editors ... At the moment, my computer is in repair, so I am editing from an iPad, meaning each post I make is a lot of work. I left a question for you at Talk:Greek mythology, but when I returned this morning, that question was gone. That meant I had to click through several edits to figure out what happened. This is the sort of thing that another editor might get very fussed about and which could cause you a problem, because other editors might feel their time is wasted. It didn’t cause me a problem, but is something you should be aware of. My best suggestion is that, while learning to edit, a featured article is a hard place to start, so you might start in other areas. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New editors

Wikipedia has a policy Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers, which basically means that you are in the training wheel stage of becoming an experienced editor. Some of your edits are being reverted, and you are getting guidance, but this has not progressed to actual warnings (there is a formal system), or being temporarily or indefinitely blocked (shit can happen). Please stay active and learn. You can't 'break' Wikipedia. Editors who are advising you have good intentions, although some may be short on tact. Experienced eitors can actually be formally warned if there is evidence that they are 'biting' newcomers. David notMD (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the informal record for going from being welcomed as a new editor to being indefinitely blocked is under one hour. Malicious editing is treated entirely differently than new editors erring in good faith. David notMD (talk) 15:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, The great Jay, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community - subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Re: your post at the Teahouse

I saw your post at the teahouse. I've taken the liberty of removing duplicated "Welcome to the Wikipedia Adventure" posts from your talk page, and added a different welcome notice. Please take the time to read all the linked pages, as they will give you a much better idea of what Wikipedia is and is not. Mjroots (talk) 15:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations

Editors typically make major improvements to an article before starting a GA nomination. For example, see Solo Man, where the nominating editor first tripled the length of the article. For my own work on vitamins, I start by removing bad information and replacing old references with newer/better references, often shortening the article, before adding to it. I nominated those when I thought they were good enough, but every time, the reviewer called for huge improvements to stuff I had neglected to work on, and identified weaknesses in additions I had made. Consider gaining experience by improving Stub to Start, Start to C-class and C-class to B-class. See criteria at Wikipedia:Content assessment. David notMD (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi The great Jay! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reliablility, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Signature on Talk pages

You have added some comments to Talk:Mount St. Helens but you have not identified yourself using a signature. I have added your signature to your unidentified comments. I suggest that, in future, you can sign your comments on Talk pages as recommended at Wikipedia:Signatures behavioural guideline. GeoWriter (talk) 11:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I will do so. Blue Jay (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Durian at FAR

Hi, Im not sure if youre into Durian, but if youre willing to help Wikipedia:Featured article review/Durian/archive1, you're welcome in there. Happy editing. 2001:4455:30B:6C00:18B:9C7D:FC09:3BB3 (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't think I'm good in this kind of topic, but thanks for asking anyway. Blue Jay (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Save Award

On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, The great Jay! Your work on Mars has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well. Blue Jay (talk) 22:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Mars (estimated annual readership: 2,157,665) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Blue Jay (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]