Talk:Onslaught (1989 video game)
Appearance
On 17 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Onslaught (video game) to Onslaught (1989 video game). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 17 April 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 18:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Onslaught (video game) → Onslaught (1989 video game) – Disambiguation against Onslaught (2009 video game). Discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Onslaught (video game) should be moved. Potentially controversial or needs discussion. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support this one gets 173 views but the 2009 one gets 126[[1]] way too close for a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Neither game is especially well-known, so diambiguating in this way is a more natural way of getting readers to the article they're looking for.--Martin IIIa (talk) 01:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support WP:NOPRIMARY situation, probably uncontroversial move that could have just been boldly done sans discussion tbh. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree, but a discussion was requested on the link i provided. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 14:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support. It appears that the 2009 video game is not based on the 1989 video game but instead the games are completely separate. Thus neither game is the primary topic. JIP | Talk 01:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support - obvious conclusion. ɱ (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.