Talk:NoCopyrightSounds

Not public domain

From what I can tell, NoCopyrightSounds are copyrighted and they allow free use with attribution and (I assume) no modification as long as you do not make too much money, then you have to contact them for licensing. We should update opening paragraph to make this clear. --vossman (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@Vossman: How do you know? — Zawl 07:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

@Zawl: Well if it had no copyright and was actually public domain, then

1. there would be no obligation for users provide attribution,
2. their music would not have the copyright logo at the bottom of every song ,for example see "© NCS" in the comments on every recent video.
3. they would not have an email address for licensing on their website http://ncsmusic.com/: "If you're a brand or a commercial organisation interested in using NCS music, please get in touch at licensing@nocopyrightsounds.co.uk"

In summary, NCS is clearly maintaining the copyright on all their songs. The have a disclaimer that you can use it "without the fear of copyright claims." There is no reason that they could not change their minds in the future. IANAL, but I assume the disclaimer next to the copyright should hold up in court, but there might be a loop-hole to have all content with their music demonetized.

Anyway, I think it is misleading to claim that their music has no copyright or is in the public domain, which it clearly is not.

I agree with vossman. NCS terms of use are more like CC-BY-NC-ND License, though I couldn't find any reference to a license on their website or anywhere else. This is far from public domain or copyright-free and it has nothing to do with an open-source record label. Gordang (talk) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Stub

Do we think that this should be considered a stub due to the lack of info on the page? Modded (talk) 19:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Artists list

Looks like the artists list is rather long. Is it possible to split the list into multiple columns, similar to artists lists on pages like Monstercat, OWSLA, or Mad Decent? My suggestion would be to split the columns by about 20em, as it leaves very little whitespace between columns. 2601:589:8000:2ED0:BC7F:48F8:D0BE:D58D (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Done. Gordang (talk) 22:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

"Vanze" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vanze. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Anixto

Is there possibly a better source than just a Spotify or a SoundCloud listing that can be used to verify this artist's recent connection to the label? Per WP:AFFILIATE, iTunes is also acceptable to use, but only if it lists the record label on the store page. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

"Jo Cohen" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Jo Cohen should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 22#Jo Cohen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Besomorph

What About Besomorph DSOFOreverTYU (talk) 07:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done Jalen Folf (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Updating entire page.

NCS' wikipedia page is so outdated and doesn't represent the business well. I'd love to change the whole layout to be more down the style of Monstercat's categorised by year with big milestones that the company has reached. Echo984 (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Youtube

Is the YouTube info in the ibx neccasary? Because all of the other pages about record labels (such as Interscope Records and Ninja Tune), don't even have this info so I don't see why this is exempted. If there is any reason to keep it in there please let me know. Thank you. CB (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Sending this discussion to WP:WPMUSIC. I have a feeling this one might be up for debate. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

• No, because this information is trivial. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Comment: I assume the reason it's there in the first place is related to the emphasis on this being "a YouTube-first label" and "started as a YouTube channel in 2011". Whether or not that's a good excuse I don't know, but it seems like a sensible explanation. QuietHere (talk) 19:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Artists with reliable sources rejected

Why are artists with reliable sources not from NCS or streaming services rejected? It's weird. 2A02:8440:340A:C8B7:0:5E:DD7:4D01 (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

correction: NCS Website 2A01:CB15:820D:5A00:ADB9:553C:A365:270E (talk) 14:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Several reasons for this:

• You can't just slap a source onto an artist and claim the mention and connection is in there. Each source has to be checked.
• The recent additions did not make mention of a connection to the label.

Hope this helps. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

I'm starting to notice one of the anons in this discussion is en masse adding artists without checking the significance of the NCS mention in the source. All passing mentions are subject to removal. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Why was Dirty Palm deleted when the article in question contains two videos about NCS songs?

article in question: https://shiningbeats.pl/dirty-palm-on-fire/ 2A01:CB15:820D:5A00:358B:4F68:C41F:7FAC (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Again, it goes back to passing mentions. The source itself is primarily about a release on a sublabel of Spinnin' Records. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Courtesy pinging Binksternet to this discussion before the last anon that commented raises concern here. At the moment, I am neutral on the current reversion, but if I'm understanding this correctly, one side of the argument relates to sourcing with the other side a WP:LISTPEOPLE concern? Jalen Folf (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I would like to see the inclusion criteria tightened to prevent the excessive promotion we've been seeing here. WP:LISTPEOPLE says only people who have a serious chance of meeting WP:MUSICBIO requirements should be listed, which in practice means artists that already have biography articles written about them on Wikipedia. If we apply LISTPEOPLE inclusion criteria, then the list of artists gets knocked way down to a dozen entries. Binksternet (talk) 22:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I have gone ahead and done this, but this also leaves behind a lot of redirects to this article where the intended mention is no longer present. These should go to RfD or alternate target, but I'll go ahead and G7 some of my creations. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Adjustments should also be made to Template:Editnotices/Page/NoCopyrightSounds – the warning notice. Binksternet (talk) 07:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done Jalen Folf (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Notability concerns

In relation to the thread above, this article is starting to become plagued by the overabundance of artist inclusion, and not enough sources talk about the record label by itself. If no sources about the label itself and not just its releases can be found, I am not opposed to another editor taking this article to AfD again. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

We have significant coverage from YourEDM, Billboard and Dancing Astronaut, which might be WP:THREE. Skyshiftertalk 15:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Also We Rave You. Not sure how reliable these websites are though (of course Billboard is). Skyshiftertalk 16:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 4 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

---

NoCopyrightSounds → NCS (record label) – An attempt to move this page to NCS (British record label) was recently challenged on WP:COMMONNAME grounds, and the company recently began using their initialism for marketing and official branding. This discussion is now required to determine if NCS is the new COMMONNAME for the subject. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 19:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose per Wikipedia:Article titles#Avoid ambiguous abbreviations. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Keep it's name. I don't think it should be renamed. The words "NoCopyrightSounds" are still used, and using NCS (record label) might certainly confuse some people. It's the same why we use Major League Soccer full name instead of it's abbreviation, "MLS". TheInfoGiver827 (talk) 04:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

• Keep the title is already perfect, not needed to be renamed, check the youtube channel Theblackmidi72 (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Oppose per @Pppery. NoCopyrightSounds is still the name of the record label as it is used as the YouTube channel's username and 'NoCopyrightSounds' is used in the about this channel section. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 08:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The record label is still called NoCopyrightSounds on YouTube

if you check it on YouTube, you can see that it is still NoCopyrightSounds and not NCS 223.178.87.23 (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss at the above section about the page move Theblackmidi72 (talk) 11:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)