Talk:Ninja (gamer)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Proposal to relocate to "Ninja (Streamer)"

Proposing that this article gets moved to a new page "Ninja (Streamer)". Guy Beahm's page redirects to Dr. Disrespect, for example. Furthermore, we should follow the Pro Wrestling template by creating pages based on their most popular name (See: Undertaker for Mark Calaway, CM Punk for Phil Brooks, Daniel Bryan for Bryan Danielson). Thoughts? --72.197.220.9 (talk) 01:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposal to rename title to "Ninja (Gamer)"

Although he streams nearly everyday, he has been involved in eSports, etc, and his bestfriend is a guy called Baldur his snapchat is @baldurbanani

and I feel gamer would explain him better, rather than just streamer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deez troy da juice (talk • contribs) 04:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC) 

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2018

2604:2000:B083:D900:F145:A22A:3819:F3F7 (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Games: Realm Royale

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2018

doesn't ninja have over 13 million subscribers on Youtube to be accurated. 105.226.112.228 (talk) 18:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposal to add personal information

Tyler Blevins brothers are named Chris who is the middle brother and John who is the oldest brother. Ninja's wife is called Jessica goch <small class="afff94.190.201.202 (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

== Best Fortnite player ever abita a sapri e il suo secondo nickname è lucwolf06

Ninja (streamer) and Draft:TSM Myth (streamer) Special:Contributions/Personale (talk) 06:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

No Jmurphy15 (talk) 05:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2018

As his profile picture:

File:Ninja at home.jpg

At home lying in his bed

Hero810 (talk) 17:51, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The image does not have a license, so may soon be deleted. If you want to upload it under fair use, upload it at Wikipedia, not Wikimedia Commons. --Danski454 (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2018

Kim Dotcom, founder of Megaupload and former no. 1 Call of Duty player in the world, was also present at March 2018 record-breaking Twitch stream with Drake. Elysofly (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Danski454 (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Inconsistency of subject's name

Throughout the article, Blevins is inconsistently referred to as "Tyler Blevins", "Blevins", "Tyler", or "Ninja". One of these names, either "Blevins" or "Ninja", should be selected and used consistently throughout the article whenever the subject is referred to, in order to avoid confusion and style errors. (See MOS:SURNAME) TheMrP (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposal to add the controversy surrounding Ninja's decision not to stream with female gamers

Request: Add a section titled "Controversy" with the following text:
Ninja announced in an interview with Polygon that he does not stream with female gamers out of respect for his marriage and to avoid the rumors that the streaming could create. He received backlash from some saying that he is a pioneer in this industry and should thus set the example and not make it more difficult for female streamers to rise to prominence. Others supported his cause, claiming that he should be allowed to do what he wants to protect his marriage. Ninja issued a response to the critics, reaffirming his support for gender equality and restating his commitment to his marriage, this time mentioning some prominent female streamers by name. Abagh0703 (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

References

 Done Danski454 (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

There was no real controversy there. It was just a bunch of insignificant publications hyping it up and omitting context for clickbait views, like they do with everything he says or do, and then a bunch of response tweets to the exaggerated articles. 141.226.11.48 (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2018

Ninja's follower counter on twitch is above 11 million, a change from 10+ million Nialltheboss (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done QueerFilmNerd^talk 04:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2018

Dathness (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

hes a Celtic descendant hes from Spain

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2019

GOT EMMMM — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleSuper (talk • contribs) 02:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2019

Dfgfdfg (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 09:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2019

Ninja is the Ice Cream on The Masked Singer Andrewpham166 (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NiciVampireHeart 13:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Seeing as this page now comes up as one of the first results on google for the word "ninja", perhaps its time to add disambiguation at the top, linking to the disambiguation page for the word ninja, and perhaps to the page about ninjas(the feudal japanese secret agents)?142.112.183.240 (talk) 09:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Ninja at Lollapalooza.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2020

I just wanted to copy-edit Ninja's Youtube subscriber count from 22.3 million subscribers (December 6, 2019) to 22.8 million subscribers (February 7, 2020). Also, wanted to copy-edit his total views on Youtube from 1.99 Million views (December 6, 2019)to 2.06 million views (February 7, 2020). AsianN1nja509 (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

 Working Your request was malformed, but I can see what you want done. --Doug Mehus T·C 19:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done, with rounding to the nearest 10 million subscribers and nearest million views, consistent with the article's style. If anything has been missed, please submit a new request, properly formed. Thank you. --Doug Mehus T·C 20:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2020

I would like to add an image of Tyler (Ninja) Blevins to this Wikipedia page.The image is below.

File:Tyler-blevins-ninja-time-100-2019-002-1.jpg

Tyler (Ninja) Blevins on Times Magazine

63.246.135.26 (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

That is a copyrighted image. – Thjarkur (talk) 00:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Main Picture

We need a better main picture of ninja - DrKerbalBlox

We need a picture!

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ninja_at_Lollapalooza.jpg resulted in deletion, see #A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion. But English Wikipedia has slightly more lenient rules than Commons.

Surely we can find one that can be justified under fair use? Andrewa (talk) 09:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

@Andrewa: The WP:NFCC do not allow for non-free images of living people (in most cases). Ninja is sufficiently public that he would not fall under any of those cases, and so we need a free image. --Izno (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

What makes you think they do not allow for non-free images of living people (in most cases)? I'm missing something.

I did look at WP:NFCC#Policy before, and I can't see any reason that an image if one were found couldn't satisfy all ten criteria. Even the deleted screenshot might be usable, if it satisfied all of the ten criteria, if it were uploaded to en:Wikipedia rather than to Commons, and if a rationale were to be provided. I can't say on the information I have whether or not it satisfies all of the criteria.

This is important, to avoid anyone wasting time on another deleted image! Andrewa (talk) 22:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

NFCC#1: We cannot use a non-free image if is possible to get a free image. Ninja is alive, he is nowhere close to recluse and is very much a public figure. So it is entirely possible for someone to photograph Ninja themselves, and then release that image in a free license. Because that is possible, we cannot use a non-free. Also see this Resolution from the Wikimedia Foundation, specifically that " An EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals. " (EDP here is the same as our NFCC). --Masem (t) 22:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! NFCC should IMO mention and link to that resolution. As it is, I think my interpretation of the rules is reasonable. But as you say, this resolution clarifies that. Andrewa (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2020

″− — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.108.42.25 (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

 Not done Your request was malformed and incomplete in that you appear to not have specified what it is you want done. Please feel free to resubmit a new request, clearly stating what it is you want done, and providing appropriate reliable source sourcing as and when applicable. Doug M. T·C 13:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 12 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move as originally proposed. In regards to the second proposal, there is consensus against moving to legal names at this time. (non-admin closure) OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Closer's note: I have been asked to give a detailed rationale on how I determined the consensus on this requested move, and I am more than happy to do so. Given how contentious this RM turned out to be, I really should've done this from the start, so I'll start by apologizing for not giving a more detailed explanation originally. If I were to consider the request from a purely numerical standpoint, the request would have 5 people in favor of moving to disambiguate the pages with (gamer) at the end of the title and 9 in opposition to it. In terms of the second proposal to move to full names, I counted 3 in support of that proposal, and 8 in opposition to it. However, I mostly took the arguments into consideration while determining the consensus of this requested move.

There are numerous arguments made both for and against moving the articles, which admittedly made determining consensus a bit more difficult than I originally expected it to. From what I can tell, what caused this discussion to become muddled was the disagreement among editors between whether WP:CONCISE should apply vs. WP:PRECISE. There were also concerns that gamer is too informal of a disambiguator vs. video game player, and was too unclear about what kind of gamer they are (board games, card games, video games, etc.), although I also note that the current precedent at WP:NCSPVG does allow for (gamer) to be used in article titles. I did not find a clear consensus in one direction or the other, and I felt that there wasn't any justification for me to weight any arguments differently from another, so no consensus for the first proposal was the only logical outcome, in my view.

In terms of the second proposal, I found that there was significant opposition to moving to full names per WP:COMMONNAME and lack of recognizability. I also found that Izno provided the strongest argument for how best to handle the question of whether it's more appropriate to use full names vs. gamer tags: WP:STAGENAME is the relevant guideline that should be applied here regarding their "gamer tag". If you can show evidence that the full name is the more reliably sourced, feel free to start individual rename requests, but I expect that in most cases reliable sources will refer to them as something to the effect of "gamer tag Y (real name X)" and then continue with the tag or likely "real name X (gamer tag Y)" and then continue with the tag.

Finally, backchannel mass RM's such as this one should not be and is not the way to amend the current consensus on WP:NCVG. Consensus is needed from the broader editing community for that. I urge all interested parties to start an RfC to determine the consensus on the ideal naming conventions for gamers/e-sports gamers/video game players/what have you, moving forward. (non-admin closure) OhKayeSierra (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

RfC closer's note: The WP:NCVG guideline supporting this decision has now been overturned by this RfC. Hence they will be moved in compliance with the updated guideline. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

---

• Ninja (video game player) → Ninja (gamer)
• Shroud (video game player) → Shroud (gamer)
• Faker (video game player) → Faker (gamer)

– ... and so on
The term "video game player" is a bit verbose, especially as used in an article title. The argument could be made that "gamer" is too informal and thus unencyc, however the term has an article already which the verbose term redirects too, and the Wiktionary entry doesn't specify it as informal. Therefore, I think it's due to relabel these people (who don't fit under "streamer" or any other short label) as simply gamers.
And yes, there are lots of other articles with the same parenthesis (actually over 100 of them) which should also logically be renamed, but I didn't want to link every single one. Gaioa (T C L) 12:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 17:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.  — Dmehus (talk) 00:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: this request has been listed for closure at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure. PI Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 04:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Survey

• Comment: Whatever is decided this should be reflected in WP:NCVG#Disambiguation as it currently allows both. A guideline should not give multiple options as that leads to an inconsistent style (see WP:CONSISTENT) and pointless WP:RMs that go back and forth. Decide on one and remove the other from the guideline. --Gonnym (talk) 14:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC).
  • Well, in general, between the two, gamer is preferred (per WP:CONCISE) but it's at least theoretically possible for two people with the same name to both be gamers, one of which is of the video game variety and other other some other type of gamer. For example, if there was also a role-playing game gamer named Ninja, then the appropriate disambiguator for this one would be video game player. So it's reasonable for the guideline to allow both, but I do think it should be clear about preferring the WP:CONCISE one and that it is used whenever there is only one gamer among all uses of the name in question. --В²C ☎ 19:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

• Move to full name and disambiguate as necessary with (gamer) - What I find informal and unencyclopedic is the use of gamer tags/aliases as the article title in the first place - especially true when the player has used several aliases. Almost all reliable, journalistic sources use primarily the actual name of the person as in Tyler Blevins. There have been many mainstream sports professionals that have had very strongly-connected nicknames associated with them, but we almost never use them - and I think the same should be done here. I do support fully replacing (video game player) with (gamer) across the board and this should be reflected in WP:NCVG. -- Netoholic @ 15:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Support disambiguation to (gamer). Do not support moving to full name - I think WP:COMMONNAME should stand in most these cases, as I disagree their legal names are used more commonly in journalistic sources. And for me, mainstream professionals that go by their nicknames near exclusively should also have their pages listed under their nicknames.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
• Soft Strong Oppose to shortening "video game player" to "gamer". It may be used by the younger generation(s) (that is, mine), but I still feel like it's less precise. How does the Library of Congress handle this parenthetical qualifier? I feel like we should follow that, and OCLC's, standards.

Meh to the move to the full name mainly because I'm not sure what Netoholic means by "full name" in this context. Doug Mehus T·C 17:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Based on context I th)no they want Ninja moved to Tyler Blevins.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Oh okay, then I'm consider my !vote a support/weak support to fuller name and oppose the shorter, colloquial "gamer" parenthetical qualifier. Greatly prefer "video game player" or whatever the LoC is doing. Doug Mehus T·C 23:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose "Gamer" can potentially apply to any game, as said in the article, including board games and others. WP:PRECISE applies here. Perhaps "video game streamer" would be a more accurate and precise disambiguation._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

  @Zxcvbnm:: Is that really a strong concern though? We scarcely have any articles on board gamers, and its exceptionally unlikely we'll have a title of a board gamer overlap with any video gamer. We have so much to gain via WP:CONCISE here, that I for one am fine conceptually grouping board gamers with video gamers for naming purposes here. There is no chance of confusion for the reader. -- Netoholic @ 12:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Gamer is beeteer than video game player Maherhimri (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

• Support as proposed. "Gamer" is concise, precise, natural, recognizable, and common. "Video game player" is only two of those, and using full names is only one of them. Red Slash 19:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

  Red Slash, Maybe among gamers, yes, but it's also ambiguous, per Zxcvbnm. I think there's probably weak, but enough consensus to move to the fuller name (i.e., Tyler Blevins), but there's no consensus as I see it to "gamer". Doug Mehus T·C 03:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

  Anyone who has even a passing knowledge of the topic would expect to find him at "gamer". It's the common name for his profession. It's why we have titles like Richard Thompson (musician) instead of (player of instruments). I might disagree with your idea of consensus, but that's irrelevant; I'm not trying to close the discussion but to make a few points. Red Slash 19:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

  Red Slash, Right, but how is the Library of Congress disambiguating him? I'm not sure gamer is the correct terminology for our taxonomy. Doug Mehus T·C 00:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

• Comment to consensus closer and previous participants the Library of Congress' name authority record for Tyler Blevins uses just Tyler Blevins, so unless we have more than one Tyler Blevins article, I'd favour moving to fuller form of name without the parenthetical qualifier as it's unnecessary. If we need the parenthetical qualifier, the LoC uses (eSports gamer), per his LC authority record], as a variant heading. This would seem to alleviate my, Zxcvbnm's, and other editors' concerns with the ambiguous gamer.
• Alternate Move Proposal (since their full form of names require no parenthetical qualifier, thus they are the primary topic)

Ninja (video game player) → Tyler Blevins

Shroud (video game player) → Michael Grzesiek

Faker (video game player) → Lee Sang-hyeok

Doug Mehus T·C 00:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting with pings to the previous participants (Gaioa, Gonnym, Red Slash, Zxcvbnm, Netoholic, Ortizesp, Maherhimri, and 69.157.252.96) to !vote to my alternate move proposal specified immediately above. All added comments below this line, please, but if are not a previous participant, please !vote by expressing your support/opposition to which proposal—that is, the first, primary proposal, or this alternate proposal
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doug Mehus T·C 00:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

• Reiterating support for using real names - Is generally WP:NATURALDIS, complies with WP:NCBIO. Gamer "tags" or Twitch "usernames" do not rise to the level of WP:STAGENAME as most journalistic sources would never use only their gamer tag alone without also citing their actual names. I am opposed to "(eSports gamer)" disambiguation as less WP:CONCISE than simply (gamer) which is perfectly adequate. -- Netoholic @ 02:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

  Netoholic, gamer is too generic, though. It's also unnecessary. Why not just the proposed names above, without a parenthetical qualifier? We just don't need them. There's nothing to disambiguate here. Can I confirm, then, your support for the real names without a parenthetical qualifier? (For the record, I agree with you and others to using their real name as the article title (and their eSports gamer tags/Twitch usernames in the Lede.) Doug Mehus T·C 03:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

  I think this assertion regarding STAGENAME is quite off the mark. "Tags" and "user names" exactly fit into STAGENAME even if journalistic sources will let you know what their real name is. STAGENAME does not require that their real name never be mentioned (you'll note for example that Cher has her real name mentioned), only that it be The name used most often to refer to a person in reliable sources...
  That aside, I am also opposed to "esports gamer" or similar (and this was discussed in the RFC originating the text in WP:NCVG), as not all video game players/streamers are necessarily professional or even pro-am (as the Super Smash Bros. community likes to call it), and moreover requires the mental leap related to "esports" meaning something distinct from e.g. "sports". --Izno (talk) 03:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

• Comment Shroud (video game player) was originally at Michael Grzesiek, so this would effectively only be moving it back to the fuller form of name, without the unnecessary parenthetical qualifier, Netoholic. In that case, ViperSnake151 was the editor who moved it to Shroud (video game player) in an undiscussed move. Doug Mehus T·C 03:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

  I only mention the (gamer) disambiguation in the rare event we actually do need disambiguation based on their full name. I don't see it any differently than mainstream sports disambiguations, where we use broad, simple terms. -- Netoholic @ 06:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

  Netoholic, Okay, fair enough. It sounds like you and I are on the same page, then, except where we need to disambiguate. In these three cases, their real names can be used (which are also their WP:COMMONNAME—I disagree with the editor below that we need to use their alias name, why are video game players treated differently from, say, celebrities or politicians?) without a parenthetical qualifier. The parenthetical qualifier is where we differ; I prefer eSports gamer because that's what the Library of Congress seems to use. Doug Mehus T·C 00:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

• Neutral as proposed (although this should be proposed to WP:VG), but oppose legal names. No legitimate reason to skip WP:COMMONAME to do a NATURALDAB. Otherwise we will have hundreds of stage named people with RMs. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 00:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose, I prefer the verbose disambiguator. Strong Oppose moving to their real names just to avoid this issue, they are overwhelmingly referred to by their online aliases. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Xezbeth, I agree with you about preferring the more verbose disambiguator, though I wasn't suggesting to move to the fuller (real) names to get around not requiring disambiguation. I am more or less neutral on fuller name/aliases, but I would point out that Ninja (video game player) was originally at Tyler Blevins and moved here in an undiscussed, bold move. Doug Mehus T·C 16:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose; gamer is too informal. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
• Support Dmehus's alternate proposal, per Netoholic. --JBL (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
• Support. The term gamer is used almost exclusively to refer to someone who plays video games, not any other kind of games, so much so that as a disambiguator it should be clear to anyone familiar with the topic, the gamer named Ninja in this case, that that is what it means. A video game player sounds like a piece of equipment akin to Video player. Regarding the argument that gamer is too "informal", that ship has sailed. Even the NY Times no longer puts it in quotes[1]. Language is constantly evolving, and gamer is English now. --В²C ☎ 23:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Born2cycle, Nevertheless, we don't have to resolve the parenthetical qualifier for the disambiguation, unless you're opposing the move to the fuller name. There's some support to moving to the fuller name and a sort of mixed bag (I'd call it a "no consensus" on the parenthetical qualifier). As noted above, if moving to the fuller name, we (as nom has proposed and I in the alternative proposal), neither of these three articles needs disambiguating. I would rank the Library of Congress as a far more reliable source than The New York Times, especially the "Culture" section of the Old Grey Lady as such sections are notoriously filled with sponsored content and columns not written by newspaper staffers. As such, it's not a reliable source. --Doug Mehus T·C 23:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

We use sources differently in title decision-making than for supporting article content. For titles we’re trying to establish usage based on the assumption that recognizability is highly correlated with usage. In this case if many more refer to and know this person as Ninja than by his full name, then we should use Ninja, disambiguated as necessary. And The NY Times is a much better source for ascertaining usage than is the Library of Congress. —В²C ☎ 07:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Born2cycle, Thanks for the clarification. As to the fuller name, I disagree that "Ninja" and "Tyler Blevins" are mutually exclusive in terms of WP:COMMONNAME, particularly if there is widespread usage of both but "Ninja" is still favoured to a degree. Both names would follow our BLP definition of common name; using WP:OFFICIALNAME, the name would be Richard Tyler Blevins, so there would be no support for that. However, whether we use "Ninja" or "Tyler Blevins," assuming there's still significant source coverage for both names, it comes down to a judgment call on a case-by-case, non-precedent setting-basis. If the majority here prefer "Ninja," that's fine, but note that there is arguably no consensus on the parenthetical qualifier; thus, the existing titling would remain. If the majority here prefer the real common name, "Tyler Blevins," then we can have no parenthetical qualifier. In short, both are possible common names, subject to the above; it comes down to the point-in-time consensus on what is preferred for these individuals. Doug Mehus T·C 11:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Well, my main point is that "gamer" as disambiguator is an excellent choice, and that the objections to using it are not based in policy or common usage. Hopefully the closer will see that and evaluate consensus accordingly. --В²C ☎ 17:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• Support original request per Born2cycle, oppose move to full names as not being nearly as recognizable. – Thjarkur (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
• Support all as proposed for the simple fact that at the present time, Video game player is a redirect to the article Gamer. In other words, the current titles/disambiguators are akin to {{R from other disambiguation}} redirects if they were redirects, and I support these moves per WP:PRECISE. (FWIW, I did notice that there was an "oppose per WP:PRECISE" above ... per the way that guideline is worded, since Video game player redirects to Gamer, WP:PRECISE would be in "support" of this move, especially considering that both words/phrases represent a category of person, and not the activity that the person is participating in [such as using the disambiguator "video game" without adding a person-related noun at the end.]) Steel1943 (talk) 16:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  • ...Also, neutral on using "real name"s for titles. My support above is in regards to the disambiguators of the current titles; considering that real names comply with WP:NATURAL since they will usually not need disambiguators amended to them, I have no opposition to them, but am not going to take the effort to determine if they are WP:COMMONNAMEs ... so thus, I'm "neutral". Steel1943 (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

    Plus, there's nothing that says WP:COMMONNAME has to take precedence over WP:NATURAL, I think. It seems to me they're known well enough by their real names as their aliases. Even if there were, we've got WP:PAGEDECIDE which lets us determine such matters. Doug Mehus T·C 18:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

    • ...Actually, in most cases I've seen, a title that follows WP:NATURAL is preferred over a title with a disambiguator, but only if it is the WP:COMMONNAME for the subject. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

• Strong oppose, as per WP:PRECISE – "video game player" is a subset of "gamer", which has a broader definition. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

IJBall, Well said. Are you neutral on the real names, or do you support or oppose that? Doug Mehus T·C 14:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I doubt the real names are anywhere near the WP:COMMONNAMEs, so even though it would solve the WP:NATURALDIS issue, I have to oppose that solution. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

IJBall I suspect, though, in the eSports gaming community, they are known equally by their aliases and their real names, so it's roughly equal as to which is WP:COMMONNAME. Nevertheless, common name is not a "thou must do this always" rule; it is a guideline, to which WP:PAGEDECIDE says the prevailing consensus at a given time how each page is to be titled. Moreover, as you noted, this would at least satisfice everyone by resolving the disputed gamer disambiguation qualifier. Thus, while I am, more or less, neutral to real names versus aliases (slightly prefer real names, when possible, possibly on WP:BLP reasons), I think this would be a good outcome. Everyone would be both a little bit annoyed, but also modestly pleased, at the same time. Doug Mehus T·C 16:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose for now. This is a trainwreck.
  WP:NCVG should not be changed by a backdoor mass-RM. If you think the guidance provided in that guideline is insufficient, start an RFC. (I personally don't like having two suggested disambiguation kinds either, but the originating RFC did not settle on one or the other. I implemented the RFC in such a way because of that fact, and while I have a preference, an RM is not the place to figure out the rest of the community's preference on the matter.)
  WP:STAGENAME is the relevant guideline that should be applied here regarding their "gamer tag". If you can show evidence that the full name is the more reliably sourced, feel free to start individual rename requests, but I expect that in most cases reliable sources will refer to them as something to the effect of "gamer tag Y (real name X)" and then continue with the tag or likely "real name X (gamer tag Y)" and then continue with the tag.
  Now, since WP:NCVG is the guideline of interest, and it doesn't provide a preference between the two, these moves should be rejected by the closer of this discussion (and probably with a strong suggestion to start an RFC elsewhere). If/when WP:NCVG is updated to provide a stronger preference, then we can move (without contention!) the pages in question (or leave them where they are pending the result of that discussion). --Izno (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Izno, Thank you for referencing WP:NCVG! Chiefly because I didn't know which policy provided the correct guidance, I was just going with the Library of Congress' preference, which is eSports gamer, apparently, but certainly not the shortened gamer. Very useful policy to link to. Doug Mehus T·C 11:58, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Izno (and Dmehus), I appreciate your perspectives, but sorry, I'm not following. WP:NCVG explicitly allows either gamer or video game player as a disambiguator. So it's precisely up to RM participants to decide which to use for a given situation. Furthermore, the only policy guidance I'm aware of that does prefer one over the other is WP:CONCISE which clearly prefers gamer. Unless I'm missing something, updating NCVG to reflect guidance from WP:AT/WP:CONCISE by removing the unnecessarily wordy video game player as a disambiguator option should not be controversial. --В²C ☎ 01:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose Recently, at the VG project we have pushed articles away from "video gaming" or "gaming" on the basis that "gaming" while in the vg industry is known to refer to "video game playing" is not that well known outside it. The same principle applies to the term "gamer"; within the industry we know its meaning, but outside it is not well establish and could be confused with a traditional board game player or the like. We want to avoid slang in disambiguation terms, and "video game player" is the more concise yet accurate and undisputed term. Also, oppose moving to real names as their "stage name" is most often their most common name, which we use across the board for other performers. --Masem (t) 03:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose. The disambiguation of "player" is not clear enough to what it refers. Baseball players, association football (soccer) players, etc. To find a balance between WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE, I think PRECISE is more important. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• Support proposal and Oppose the use of full names proposal Neither the Cambridge Dictionary [2] or Merriam-Webster [3] note the word "gamer" as informal (in addition to the Collins dictionary [4]). It allows for the article title to be concise and precise without using the long-winded "video game player" (which already redirects to gamer). Furthermore, I oppose using real names because that would violate WP:COMMONNAME. Ninja is most commonly known as Ninja not Tyler Belvins the same can be said for Shroud as that is what he most commonly known under not Michael Grzesiek.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 21:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose use of full name per WP:COMMONNAME. Don't really have a strong opinion on the other part of the proposal, maybe just (video games)? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 21:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose both per Izno and Masem. - Brojam (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Brojam, Yep, I think they had some of the strongest arguments here, to be honest. I wish I'd known about WP:NCVG when I made my argument way back when. Izno for the win. ;-) Doug Mehus T·C 22:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Brojam and Dmehus, as I just noted above, NCVG is not helpful here since it explicitly allows either video game player or gamer as a disambiguator. However, WP:CONCISE clearly prefers gamer of the two. --В²C ☎ 01:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Gamer is unambiguously ambiguous, so that may, in part, be what Izno was referring to. In such a case, WP:CONCISE does not apply. Ambiguity is never permitted. Doug Mehus T·C 01:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

That ship sailed once NCVG explicitly allowed gamer as a disambiguator. Not to mention that the ambiguity of a disambiguator is only relevant if it applies to more than one use of the title in question. I mean, if one John Doe was a video game gamer and another John Doe was a board game gamer (as if that's even a thing) then you could argue that gamer would be an ambiguous disambiguator, for John Doe. But if the other John Does are authors, football players, politicians, etc, (that is nothing to which gamer could apply) then there is no ambiguity issue with disambiguating John Doe the gamer with gamer. --В²C ☎ 01:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Also, since Ninja (gamer) is already a redirect to this article, we know we have no ambiguity issue with that title. --В²C ☎ 01:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Additionally, Cambridge Dictionary [5], Merriam-Webster [6], and Collins dictionary [7]) define "gamer" as someone who plays computer/video games not as someone who plays board games.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

I'm not involved in this discussion, but Collins says "a person who plays computer games or participates in a role-playing game for one definition, and the next one says "a person who plays electronic games, board games, etc. Meanwhile the Merriam-Webster link says "a person who plays games; especially : a person who regularly plays computer or video games" which, while it says "especially", does not at all exclude other types of games. Dekimasuよ! 16:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

My point was that overall in dictionaries the word "gamer" almost exclusively covers video games (hence the lack of speech marks in my previous comment). Regarding the Collins one, the latter definition ("a person who plays electronic games, board games, etc.") Collins classifies that as slang hence I disregarded it with the former being British English so still relevant. In the context of this move (as pointed out by B2C), there is no other notable board game player/person who participates in role-playing games called "Ninja" hence there is no reason to over disambiguate it over what is necessary.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 17:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Indeed. See section below. --В²C ☎ 00:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose “Gamer” for being vague and informal, and oppose full legal names per WP:COMMONNAME. Sergecross73 msg me 21:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
• Comment/question for those citing WP:NCVG (especially considering that I'm quite familiar with it as someone who has edited it quite a bit): On what grounds does that apply to biographies? That guideline is about video game naming conventions specifically. As far as I can see and tell, there are no provisions for disambiguation for biographies in that guideline. The most precise guideline we have for that now is WP:NCP (and possibly WP:NCSP if gaming could be considered a sport.) What this tells me is that there is an apparent need to create a policy for disambiguating people involved in video gaming and/or the video game business. ... because, apparently, that guideline doesn't state, umm, anything specifically to support the 4–5 "oppose" comments above this one I'm making now. Steel1943 (talk) 18:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  • See #9 at Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(video_games)#Disambiguation. —В²C ☎ 18:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
    • ...Wow, I don't think I've ever noticed that ... tiny bit of information pertaining to biography disambiguation on a page filled with disambiguation pertaining to non-biographic articles ... on that page ... which is honestly sad considering how often I've edited it. (Funny thing is that I recently had a similar discussion about difficult-to-find information hiding on pages about somewhat unrelated topics ... so this seems to happen from time to time, apparently.) Looks like there's a need to tweak that page a bit so that the biography-specific section stands out more... Steel1943 (talk) 19:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Gamer is not informal and not too vague

Both of these points have been addressed at length above, but people are still asserting the opposite without substantiation.

• Regarding the argument that gamer is too "informal", that ship has sailed. It is common usage in reliable sources like the NY Times, LA Times, BBC, WaPo, etc. etc.
• As to it being "too vague", that's not a requirement of a disambiguator. The logic in the argument that we can't use "gamer" as a disambiguator because "gamer" is ambiguous means we can't use "singer", "politician", "album", "writer" or "footballer" as disambiguators either, because they too are "vaugue". That of course is not the case. Yes, a "gamer" can be a "video game gamer" or a "role-playing game gamer"... so what? A singer can be a rock singer or an opera singer. An album can be a country album or a photo album. A writer can be a novel writer, a science writer, a journalist or a playwright. A footballer can be an "Australian rules footballer" or an "association footballer" or "American footballer". Yet we use all of these "vague" terms as disambiguators all the time. The only requirement is to distinguish from other uses of the same name, which gamer does as long as the other uses are not gamers (of any kind). Why the insistence that this term cannot be a disambiguator due to its ambiguity when we're perfectly fine with using countless other ambiguous terms as disambiguators? It makes no sense, and I hope the closer discounts !votes based on this argument accordingly. --В²C ☎ 00:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  • At least to me, we're trying to move away from the slang of "gaming" and "gamer" at the VG project as they can create inaccuracies when used wrong. It's not the "video gaming industry" (not everyone in it is playing video games), its the "Video game industry". The issue over gamer doesn't have as much of the same problem but is associated with this same sloppy thinking, and I'd prefer that we be precise with at least using "player" (which allow sounds odd, which is why we need "video game player") or "esports" to avoid the possible. I realize that "footballer" then falls in that too, but there, outside the differences on which side of the pond you're playing on, its still obviously you're playing a physical sport. --Masem (t) 00:47, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
    • Trying to move away from language widely used by reliable sources on the grounds that it is “slang” doesn’t sound like following usage in reliable sources. It’s bordering on violating NPOV. We should not be trying to influence usage; we are supposed to be following common usage. —В²C ☎ 07:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

I would argue the opposite; trying to force a preferred definition, because of perceived usage in certain circles of society, borders on trying to inflect a certain point of view. Note that the Library of Congress, the crème de là crème of reliable, independent sources and of proper disambiguation uses the precise (eSports gamer), which I've supported using above. Doug Mehus T·C 16:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

But, unless another use of Ninja is also a gamer, eSports gamer as disambiguator is unnecessary precision relative to gamer, just like Association footballer is unnecessary precision compared to footballer, unless there is also, say, an Australian footballer with the same name in question. —-В²C ☎ 18:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

It seems that the primary issue here is that the section at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (video games)#People (now shortcutted with WP:NCSPVG) does not state whether these articles' disambiguation should be "(gamer)" or "(video game player)". They are both listed there, and there is no specification about which one should be used over the other. It seems that this issue is so contentious that there may need to be discussion to determine which one is preferred ... since this discussion here seems to challenge the very wording of that naming convention section. (However, with all that being said, I still prefer "(gamer)" which goes in line with my "Support" comment above since Gamer is the current name of the article which the disambiguator refers, and Video game player is currently a redirect to Gamer.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Is this notable?

Does this follow the Notability guidelines of Wikipedia? 2601:647:4100:10E2:9CC6:707B:384F:A127 (talk)`~ —Preceding undated comment added 21:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Ninja is very much notable through secondary sources independent of him, so yes. --Masem (t) 22:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

That website is a merch store

I'm new here so I'm now 100% sure if this is how these things usually work out, but in the infobox, Blevins' website is listed as teamninja.com, which is his merch store and not "his website" per se. Would this not count as some kind of promotion/advertisement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitizl (talk • contribs) 09:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2021

180.249.118.34 (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Can I change the year of Free Guy's release from TBA to 2021?

 Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. Terasail II^[✉] 03:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Was most subbed twitch streamer

Up until recently he was the most subscribed to twitch streamer. That record was just broken. Should probably be mentioned somewhere. Here’s an article about the new record holder: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2021/04/13/ludwig-ahgren-passes-tyler-ninja-blevins-most-twitch-subscribers/7213113002/

I’d log in and edit myself but I’m on my phone at work so if someone else could that would be great https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailv2&iss=sbi&FORM=SBIIDP&sbisrc=ImgDropper&q=imgurl:https%3A%2F%2Flotus.paheal.net%2F_images%2Fdcab966e66b034334763d9d11340fee0%2F3174304%2520-%2520FakerK%2520Fortnite%2520Ninja%2520Twitch%2520fakes%2520tyler_blevins.png&idpbck=1

64.58.242.126 (talk) 13:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DylanGoodale.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 April 2019 and 9 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DomB12.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2024

change follower count to 18.8 million from 18.6 million Wikiperson50 (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

 Already done
— Urro^{[talk][edits]} ⋮ 14:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)