User talk:Personale

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Personale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was being in sockpuppet due to the disrupting bird articles edit i did on first place, because I'm guilty of disrupting bird article since I was new so I made a new account and evade blocks and editing project to end it, but still blocked without disruptive and violating only block evasion is still policy i just helped creating articles, my choice is to wait 6 months pls deal with it i am doing a good faith edit.

Decline reason:

Given the extent of your recent socking, the WP:Standard Offer is the best you're going to get. After a minimum of six months, you can make a request from your original account - none of your sock accounts will be unblocked. If that account is globally locked at the time, you will need to follow the instructions from theinstantmatrix, below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Personale: No. See WP:BROTHER. You, as a person behind this account, whoever you are, Raymondskie99, are not allowed to edit Wikipedia due to your sock puppetry and any edits you made are reverted or deleted. If you wish to edit this project again, you have to now follow WP:SO, which means no more socking for 6 months straight, meaning you do not make any edits during that 6-month period. However, since I already requested at Steward requests/Global (permalink) to have your socks globally locked (which means that you'll not be able to log in to your accounts ever again, even on different projects), the only way you can appeal 6 months from now is by emailing stewardswikimedia.org or you can request your appeal there at SRG logged out. theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just did helping Wikipedia by creating projects, I didn't do anything disruptive @Theinstantmatrix: i was being in sockpuppet due to the disrupting bird articles edit because I'm guilty of disrupting bird article since I was new so I made a new account and evade blocks and editing project to end it, but block evasion is still policy so im gonna gonna die to wait to be unblocked (which it doesn't happen) at least restore one article Omnideck 6 it was not really mine I just edit it from the draft userbox and moved it into the main article it has a huge content, you have been with me over 3 months I know, but oh well I deserve this, @Theinstantmatrix: thx for being nice, this is the same situation like user SNAAAAKE! this is the end.User:Personale (User talk:Personale) 8:45, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Personale, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unbox Therapy (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Author blocked for sockpuppetry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unbox Therapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unbox Therapy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 04:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Personale! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brad v 04:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Witch It (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Highly edited by a sock. Steam is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Witch It and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Witch It, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 09:05, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LyraVR (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Steam is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LyraVR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LyraVR, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 11:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Metronomicon: Slay the Dance Floor has been accepted

The Metronomicon: Slay the Dance Floor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Rose in the Twilight has been accepted

A Rose in the Twilight, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucas the Spider.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucas the Spider.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia PH Month: A Call for Collaboration

Wikipedia Philippine Month or simply Wikipedia PH Month is a monthly online event inspired by Wikipedia Asian Month that aims to promote Philippine content in Philippine Wikipedia editions and beyond. Each participating local community runs a monthly online edit-a-thon, which promotes the creation or improvement of the Wikipedia content about a particular group or groups of people in the Philippines and the region they represent. The participating community is not limited to the Philippines. This activity also aims to encourage collaboration among Filipino contributors within the archipelago and in the diaspora and to create linkages among Filipino and non-Filipino contributors who support the main objective.

If you have any thoughts about this project, kindly share it in the talk page. --Filipinayzd 19:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucas the Spider.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucas the Spider.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]