Talk:List of Rajputs/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Verifiability

Per WP:V, people listed here should either have their own article, or their existence and notability should be directly sourced in a footnote. Names that have neither a blue link nor a reference attached should be removed. dab (𒁳) 11:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Recent edit war

Singh, I'm reverting your edits because they do not conform to several well-established guidelines that Wikipedia has set up. The first is neutral point of view. This means making no subjective assertations. For example, you cannot call someone the "greatest warrior" of the group, as you did with Banda Bahadur. The only way you can say something like this is if you present it with independant reliable sources. Another policy you are unintentionally violating is that of verifiability. On Wikipedia, especially on massive lists such as this, everything that can be considered contentious must be verified by reliable sources. This policy was upheld in relation to this article last year at its [Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Rajputs|deletion debate]]. For any questions you have regarding these topics, feel free to post here or contact me. Themfromspace (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Apology

I apologize for my reversion of an edit to this article with a comment about a "POV-pusher" yesterday. I was reverting a number of inappropriate edits made yesterday by someone who is a readily identifiable POV-pusher, including an addition he made to this talk page, and I must have been seriously distracted because I also reverted someone else's edit in the article itself even though that wasn't his, and my reversion made no sense. I must have been seriously distracted. Thanks to User:Shshshsh for catching it and taking care of it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Chandragupta maurya

y is Chandragupta Maurya not included in the list???...this is the extract 4rm the Rajput section.."Bappa Rawal of the Gahlot dynasty established his rule in 734 CE at Chittor. Chittor was until that time ruled by the Mori clan of Rajputs. Maan Mori was their last king at Chittor. It is believed the word Mori is a corruption of Maurya, the famous dynasty of Ashoka." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajput ````--59.182.76.186 (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Chandragupt Maurya was a Rajput, even Chanakya mentions Rajput Bardic Traditions in his poems. Chandragupt was a Great follower of Buddhism and Buddhism Mentions Rajput as a Kshatriya caste and Individual Identity of Kshatriya. Buddhism literature is the true evidence of why Kshatriya is synonymous with Rajput. Many Jat Ahir Yadav and Gujjar claim Chandragupt Maurya but Historical evidence suggest Jat Ahir Yadavs and Gujjar descend from a Rajput male and a concubine placed in Rajput Household, all historical inscription mentions jat as a fallen Rajput and Gujjar in their chronicle claim to descend from slave women captured by Male Rajput King.

Jat, Gujjars, Yadav and other foreign clans have no historical backing about them being included in Rajputs. The confusion has been there only because the surnames of Rajputs have been copied by these castes. In fact, there is a great social rivalry between Rajputs (high-caste Hindus) and Jats Gujjars Ahir Yadav(lower-caste people) wherever they coexist in society. Matrimonial alliances amongst these castes are rare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:C18A:233A:3218:14B6:8027:BBCD (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

References

I have asked for references for this article in 2007. Nothing has happened. Of the entire list, five individuals have "references", all of them random urls.

I am sure it is possible to compile a referenced list of notable Rajput, but so far nobody has done that. I suggest we delete the article for now, since removing unreferenced content would amount to removing 100% of content. Anybody is of course welcome to start compiling a list of Rajputs that is actually based on references. --dab (𒁳) 09:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Company Havildar Major Piru Singh.jpg

The image File:Company Havildar Major Piru Singh.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Jinnah06.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jinnah06.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

why was shivaji name excluded

Shivaji sisodia origin has more than enough evidence to include his name in rajput list with a note that some scholars doubt it, when jats have got ranjit singh, gujjars have included prithwiraj chauhan himself though i am not doubting his gurjar origin as gurjar is a caste whereas rajput is a clan similar to maratha and hence chauhan can be rajputs of gurjar origin.122.161.78.118 (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha

@ Sitush is deleting the names of Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha and Ram Dulari Sinha from the List of Rajputs,These two leaders are the most prominent leaders of the Rajput Community in Bihar. Kindly avoid doing this, as it is not justified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhatmishra1985 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

You need to find a reliable source that supports your statement that they are Rajputs. If you are unsure of how to enter the thing in the article then you can take a look at WP:Citing sources or just dump the info here & I will sort it out for you. - Sitush (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 March 2012

_{Bisht Rajput of Uttrakhand} 122.162.17.22 (talk) 09:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.Celestra (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Rajput names deleted with malicious intentions

The name of PIRU SINGH SHEKHAWAT has been cut short to PIRU SINGH ---http://www.upscportal.in/param-veer-chakra.pdf here is the UPSC portal his name was PIRU SINGH SHEKHAWAT A KACHWAHA RAJPUT , these vandalism also shows the typical nature of non-rajputs.ABDEVILLIERS0007 (talk) 08:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Sitush i dont really understand if you have "BASIC"understanding of CASTE SYSTEM or not because it seems doubtful that you are INDIAN OR HINDU, it will be better that you dont edit names without any knowledge. In modern day india , no NEWS ARTICLE will dare to term them RAJPUTS as this will create "POLITICAL TROUBLES" this thing was done in past as well. Shivaji was always considered RAJPUT but with "LATE BAKHARS" and then "DALIT MOVEMENT" started to claim him as a lower caste(even though none of them will say this in front of Shivaji family) this is all indian politics specially post independence where BEING UPPER CASTE IS A SIN.ABDEVILLIERS0007 (talk) 05:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Please read WP:OR and WP:V, stop shouting and stop warring. My nationality and/or religion are of no bearing and your veiled threat is not appreciated. - Sitush (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Now what will you say about the source of Jadunath Singh, Shaitan Singh and Milkha Singh, keep your mouth shut as you are only interested in deleting names even without discussing and i know editors like you, most of you are from western countries , having a large number of friends who are ADMIN or MODS and to push through your point you urge your friends to block users. ABDEVILLIERS0007 (talk) 15:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion of sourcing

Before we start discussing sources for the edits that I have just reverted, please could people read WP:SOCK and User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. I am very familiar with the way that Indic caste groups try to do their thing here but at the end of the day they usually end up "losing", for want of a better word. It is entirely possible that I have made some mistakes here. It isn't common but I am human and crap happens. Compared to the number of mistakes made by the caste warriors etc, I come out well ahead.

Please can we discuss any concerns one person, one source at a time. That will make life easier for all of us and, in the event that we cannot agree, there is always the dispute resolution process. Most of the issues will probably end up at WP:RSN or WP:BLPN but there are alternatives. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Dulla Bhatti is not mentioned here. Rajput334 03:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajput334 (talk • contribs)

Sitush why did you remove name of Shabbir Sharif from list ? he was real brother of Raheel Sharif. see this leading news paper of pakistan. please don't do things which can't be expected. moreover you can also look over this Urdu biography source which being in urdu may not be appropriate for reference but at least supports the earlier authority of news paper. The Pakistan (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I agree with both User:Rajput334 and User:The Pakistan above. and User:Sitush also consider Khudadad Khan mentioned as Rajput over here. a reliable source. Thank you Barrister at Law (talk) 06:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Shabbir Sharif is Rajput. The Peaceful Student (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Non-English sources are ok but please heed WP:NOENG. They really should only be used if we are unable to find English-language sources, and there are particular problems with many that emanate from Pakistan/India/Bangladesh etc. - Sitush (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanx for info The Peaceful Student (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Images

The images in the Sports section are a mess. I've never seen anyone attempt to insert images in that way, it is very complex and it is going to cause problems, especially for newcomers. Please can we revert the recent change. - Sitush (talk) 12:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Its not a new Idea sir. kindly look at this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Polish_people#Miscellaneous. Rajput334 (talk) 06:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

It may not be a new idea but that doesn't make it a good idea. There is much on Wikipedia that is absolute rot. - Sitush (talk) 02:00, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Mass revert

I may have overstepped the mark with this revert. These lists of alleged caste members are notoriously problematic and, frankly, I've had enough of trying to deal with the intricacies on this particular list right now. Please, do review User:Sitush/Common#Castelists and do note that websites - which are often dodgy at the best of times - are particularly dodgy when those who operate them happen to be aligned with the caste with which they claim a person bears an affiliation. Caste articles on Wikipedia and elsewhere on the internet are absolutely fraught with puffery and while we cannot control what goes on elsewhere we can at least expect a certain standard of verifiability here.

So, if I have unwittingly removed some names that were justifiably listed then I apologise for that and I'd be happy to see them reinstated. To make life easier for all of us, it might be best to reinstate them one at a time and thus avoid a lot of frustration all round. - Sitush (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2015

born GOTRA in Rajputes. YOGI Caste is born by Gogaji Chauhan.ryn (talk) 13:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Sourcing

May I yet again ask people to review the content at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. In particular, there has been a considerable edit war over the last few days and some people - at least one of whom I think has a "history" in this regard - simply do not seem to be appreciating what we have to do and why. Unless some sense begins to appear, I will be asking an admin to enforce the sanctions noted at the top of the page and, if necessary, asking for further protection to be applied to the article itself. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 May 2015

94.11.36.17 (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 21:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2015

125.209.121.197 (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC) Kanwar kartar sing King of Rajhistan 1475 to 1696. He was king who fought wars against British many times.

Not done: This is a list of notable Rajputs - where we define notable as having their own Wikipedia article - Kanwar kartar singh (I've tried several different spellings) does not appear to have an article, so cannot be included in the list, until someone writes that article. (According to your dates he was 221 when he died? ) - Arjayay (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2019

Source doesn't say that Dulla Bhatti (under historical figures) was a Rajput. Please remove his name from the list. 2605:3E80:700:10:0:0:0:2E82 (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The article Dulla Bhatti has more detailed reliable refs stating that he was indeed a Rajput. DBigXrayᗙ 12:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 May 2020

Ravindra Jadeja (indian cricketer) Shankersinh Vaghela (former CM of Gujarat) Shaktisinh Gohil (Gujarat Politician) Yogi Adityanath (CM of UP) 2405:204:8206:34AD:BCB8:E72:F3C8:430F (talk) 04:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 09:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 September 2020

I want to add few more names.Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC) I can also give reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajanrao Shankar (talk • contribs) 14:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

You can mention them here on this talk page, citing reliable sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Rajput identity of Prithviraj Chauhan

Prithviraj Chauhan should not be included on this page as a Rajput, as he was classified as a Rajput long after his death. During his lifetime, the Rajput identity did not exist. The source I am citing also talks about Rajputs and how different scholars have viewed their origin. However, this content is later in the book and I am not able to access it. User:Alivardi quoted some of it on Talk:Prithviraj Chauhan:

"I believe the Rāso contributed to the consolidation of an aristocratic Rajput identity beginning in the late sixteenth century. What the term Rajput meant prior to the Mughal period is a contentious issue, for scholars disagree about how far back we can trace the existence of the Rajputs as a community… Brajadulal Chattopadhyaya suggests that rājaputra was applied to a larger group of high-ranking men who also bore titles such as rāuta, rāvala, and rānaka… In contrast, Michael Bednar's examination of inscriptions from western and central India during the eleventh through fourteenth centuries indicates that thakkura, rāuta, and rājaputra were titles of rank that generally denoted official positions and were often not passed on from father to son. Chattopadhyaya may therefore, be somewhat premature in his assertion that Rajput identity existed in the twelfth or thirteenth centuries… Arguing in a different vein than Chattopadhyaya, Dirk H. A. Kolff claims that the label Rajput had previously denoted an open status identity that any successful warrior could acquire. During the Mughal period, however, the Rajputs closed ranks to form an aristocratic class whose membership was strictly circumscribed by birth… In any case, Rajput was not a term that figured in Indo-Persian texts prior to the sixteenth century, according to Peter Jackson, supporting the view that there was some change in the meaning of the term… As Rajput chiefs were increasingly co-opted into the Mughal system, a sharper line was drawn between them and the other, less elite, fighting men of India. One way of doing this was through acknowledging the kshatriya status of Rajputs… The repeated conflation of Rajput with kshatriya hat can be witnessed in Prthvīrāj Rāso is thus part of a larger early modern trend of stressing the elite nature of Rajputs"

If a user who has access to the full book can read through the part about Rajputs and other scholars views on their origin, that would be great, as I am sure it has lots of useful information. Chariotrider555 (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

The most common reason given by removers is that the Rajput identity did not exist in 12th century citing different sources. So tell me when did the identity came into existence and should we remove everyone before that time. Because, I don't see anybody removing Rawal Jaisal who died even before Prithviraj which makes me doubt the intentions of removers. Please explain Abhishek0831996 (talk) 04:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

The Rajput identity came into existence in the 16th century. The reason no one removed Rawal Jaisal is that since he was such a minor king, there are no sources explicitly saying he was not a Rajput. In fact, when I tried to find some a few days ago, I pretty much couldn't (however, sources kept saying the word "legend" around him). Minor kings like Rawal Jaisal don't attract as much scrutiny from high end scholars the way Prithviraj Chauhan does. Sources make statements about Rajputs in general, and how they originated. They don't go through every single ruler and subclan and say, "Oh yes this dude was Rajput but this dude wasn't." They make statements about the community in general because Rajput is an identity that clans and people joined because it offered them greater status. Anyways, people and clans before the 16th century didn't identify as Rajput. Chariotrider555 (talk) 06:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have checked the history of this page and came to the conclusion that very few people are involved in adding more and more notable person to this list. Of them Abhishek is a genuine editor but Others who have made a number of edits are blocked for sockpuppetry. Now, once Kautilya3 told me that those who are blocked for sockpuppetry .Their additions are removed en masse from the articles.If this is the rule, then all the addition by sockpuppets shud be removed.Heba Aisha (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

References

Addition of Names whose articles have already been created in Wikipedia.

1. Kashmir Singh Katoch 2. Janak Singh 3. Anant Singh Pathania 4. Vidyut Jamwal 5. General VK Singh 6. Col. Ranveer Singh Jamwal 7. General Sri Rajendra Singh ji Jadeja 8. Sankay Kumar ( Paramvir Chakra) 11:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aishtomar (talk • contribs)

Would require reliable sources for the dead and if the person is living (WP:BLP), we would require self-identification as well, that is, an interview published in a reliable source in which the subject says something like "I am a Rajput" or "I'm from a Rajput family", etc. Otherwise, can't add them. It is as per consensus at WP:INB. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The articles with their names are already present in Wikipedia, and if you still require then tell me. Aishtomar (talk) 12:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

@Aishtomar: Just merely having an article in Wikipedia doesn't get them in this article. Reiterating, every entry should have reliable sources backing up that the person is a Rajput. For the dead, reliable sources only will do, espacially scholarly sources for the historical ones. For living people, we need self=identification as per consensus, that is in an interview published in a reliable source, the subject had to say something like "I am a Rajput" or "I'm from a Rajput family". For example, Ravindra Jadeja, a living person clearly says that he is a Rajput in this source, thus we have added his name. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 September 2021

Change Feedom Fighters to Freedom Fighters (heading) 2001:8F8:1A65:1130:84F:2C71:24B5:2DFD (talk) 07:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 November 2021

Prashanti Singh is also a Rajput sports person. She is decorated with national civil honour PadmaShri 2409:4050:2D95:3A27:55DA:621D:3800:82C5 (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. That isn't mentioned in her article, or sourced anywhere. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 January 2022

Prashanti Singh Pratima Singh 2409:4050:2EBE:31CF:843F:F799:55B3:396E (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 January 2022

Please add Vidyut Jammwal in this list , He is one of the most popular celebrity and martial artist in the world , He hails from Jamwal Dogra Rajput Family , Please feature him specially with Photo Asr99.0979 (talk) 18:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Newly added Rajput article on the website

There is a new article on a Guhila Rajput King [Allata]. Can this be added before 'Prithviraj Chauhan'? Extorc (talk)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 January 2022

I want to add some famous historical names in this page which are not included. Mrvillainwolf (talk) 04:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 04:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Madhavsinh Solanki.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Pushkar Singh Dhami.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 April 2022

Hello everyone, I want to suggest a new name in this section of Politicians i.e. Yogi Adityanath, current C.M of Uttar Pradesh. @Fylindfotberserk: you are in regular check of this page so please add his name as I noticed you asked for specific source where subject call themselves Rajputs. I found one from Hindustan Times exact wording are below

I am not hurt. It is not a crime to be born in a Rajput family. This is one caste in the country in which even God was born, not once but many times. One should take pride in one’s caste, and I am proud to be a Rajput

Please add his name soon. Thank you very much. 2409:4051:2E98:AF6A:EB1F:E5F8:36C:B303 (talk) 16:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC) 2409:4051:2E98:AF6A:EB1F:E5F8:36C:B303 (talk) 16:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done, Yogi was already listed, but without a source. Added your ref, thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk: Thanks and please also add this that he was born in a Rajput family in his main article as I provided a source of self identification from reliable outlet. 2409:4051:2E98:AF6A:74D5:F5D3:6890:D160 (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Done already. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 August 2022

Please add Raja bakhtawar singh Rathore or Amjhera in freedom Fighters section 2409:4043:2395:4D91:530A:E497:16BA:F9A4 (talk) 06:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 October 2022 (2)

Please add Babu Bhoop Singh in Freedom fighters section. He was ruler of Kohra Estate and was prominent leader in Indian Rebellion of 1857. DrhSR (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: The source you have provided does not substantiate your request. Babu Bhoop Singh is not mentioned at all at Indian Rebellion of 1857 and the sources at the main article also do not substantiate this request. —Sirdog (talk) 04:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 November 2022

in last paragraph it suggest criminals which i think should be removed . 49.204.223.27 (talk) 09:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: The relevant section is indeed a list of, apparently, notable criminal Rajputs. The removal of the section is outside the scope of an uncontroversial edit and needs consensus. —Sirdog (talk) 04:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 February 2023

Shubham151994 (talk) 09:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

KAPIL THAKUR- GARHMUKTESHWAR

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 10:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 April 2023

2405:201:1006:9A:C61:C90F:1837:DE10 (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add name of India's first female President Pratibha Devising Patil's name notable political personalities section.

 Done M.Bitton (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Shivaji Rajput Origin is not Claimed it is PROVED

Shivaji the Great(Dr Balkrishna) and Historiy of Mudhol Ghorpade(DV APTE) proved it long ago that Shivaji was Rajput the FARMANS(ROYAL ORDERS) of Bahmani Sultans and Adil Shahi Sultans long ago demolished the 20th century RUMOR THAT SHIVAJI IS NOT A RAJPUT.

All the concerned contributors have a check on one of the user, the guy dont posses any knowledge of MARATHA, he has written that "SHIVAJI WAS MARATHA CASTE" . Wait Wait Wait IS MARATHA A CASTE then how are "CHITPAVAN BRAHMINS"(Peshwa Family) were Brahmins and Shinde(sindhia) and Holkar were "SHUDRA" . The guy dont posses any knowledge and the statement given by that guy in deleting the name of Shivaji was typical he said "SOME PEOPLE CLAIM" , my dear friend you are saying opposite thing HIS RAJPUT ORIGIN WAS ACCEPTED ALWAYS, the works on the basis of which SOME POLITICALLY MOTIVATED HISTORIAN DOUBT RAJPUT ORIGIN ARE -

1-Shiva Digvijaya Bakhar(composed in 1818)

2-91 qalmi Bakhr(written in 1760s)

3-Shedgaonkar Bakhar(written in 1854)

none of these works are CONTEMPORARY work of Shivaji life. Further by deleting well SOURCED content from WIKIPEDIA is a violation bear this fact in mind. 122.161.222.51 (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Rather than SHOUTING etc, is it possible to provide a source that explicitly says Shivaji was a Rajput. Forget the Maratha stuff for now because that sends us down byways regarding whether or not Marathas are Rajput; and forget other specific caste groups also, for the same reason. Usually, it is possible to find a source that uses the "Rajput" word and complies with our policies. Do that and the problem goes away. And, please, try to do it using a modern source rather than something from a couple of centuries ago - a lot of rubbish was written then, on all sorts of subjects, and we much prefer to use recent sources.

Equally, a message for the "other side" in this dispute: I realise that it is more difficult to prove a negative but I am aware that the Shivaji point has been contentious in the past, so can you find any reliable source that discusses his caste etc? - Sitush (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Please note that this article has been semi-protected once more. That means that IP contributors and other users who are not autoconfirmed will be unable to edit it. Fear not: make a request here and if it seems ok then I or someone else will sort it out. For example, if you can find something that resolves my query above then I will make it clear in the article, should that be necessary. - Sitush (talk) 17:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

And yes this once again proves that you know nothing about Shivaji. PERSIAN FARMANS(I HOPE YOU ATLEAST KNEW THE MEANING OF FARMANS) given by BAHMANI AND ADILSHAHI SULTANS to Shivaji's ancestors have proven long back that BHONSLE AND GHORPADES(COUSINS) are descendants of SISODIA RAJPUTS.05:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Sitush as again i hold more knowledge than you in this matter and if you will visit BHOSLE you will see that i have given the EVIDENCES OF SHIVAJI SHUDRA ORIGIN AS WELL but the sources which speaks of SHIVAJI AS LOWER CASTE ARE SO LATE IN DATE THAT NO NEUTRAL HISTORIAN WILL CONSIDER THEM. ABDEVILLIERS0007 (talk) 05:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I think the problem with WIKI editors are that their is no guideline because of which any editor , edits anything even when he dont know much about that thing and that is the biggest NEGATIVE point of Wikipedia. And no its not you many other too think and back themselves with jadunath sarkar and his followers , first he was not the best biograpeher of Shivaji, be it Britannica or Soviet encyclopaedia , the Shivaji article has been sourced mainly from Dr Balkrishna Shivaji the Great. Further many historians are politically motivated who may be soft on "MUSLIMS AND LOWER CASTE HINDUS". none the less many EMINENT MARATHA HISTORIANS(CV VAIDYA, GH KHARE, DV APTE, KELUSKAR, DB PARASNIS) support Shivaji rajput origin(this is before the discovery of persian farmans after the discovery their is no contest).ABDEVILLIERS0007 (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC) ABDEVILLIERS0007 (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I do agree that Maratha is a distinct category, and there have been an age when all leading clans tried to glorify them as Rajputs. Now my question is why Santaji Ghorpade is included in the list. Santaji Ghorpade Here is the actual article proving it. Removing.-- Mahensingha _{(Talk) "Thanx n Regards"} 20:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2023

Kindly add the famous people from Tiwana Rajput family of Shahpur, particularly the prominent ones like Malik Fateh Khan Tiwana, Malik Umar Hayat Khan and Khizar Hayat Tiwana. 103.211.18.43 (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I'll add these names as soon as I get time. DreamRimmer (talk) 11:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done DreamRimmer (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

are only rajasthani rajputs rajputs

few fools have edited Maratha rajputs from this list, from which era you have come, many maratha families have descent of rajputs and if you want proof then here is the proof, GS SARDESAI the noted and probably the greatest maratha historian writes this---http://books.google.co.in/books?id=lTVuAAAAMAAJ&q=their+is+no+doubt+ancestor+of+several+present+day+maratha+families+as+has+been+shown+in+the+first+chapter+migrated+from+north+rajput&dq=their+is+no+doubt+ancestor+of+several+present+day+maratha+families+as+has+been+shown+in+the+first+chapter+migrated+from+north+rajput&hl=en&ei=qtLITpr2OIHkrAfl68TBDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA go through this the fact is Maratha is no caste and we maratha no our history better than anti-maratha and anti-rajput people. Chatrapati maharaj shivaji was rajput so are we, shahu maharaj was no descendant of shivaji he was a "GHATGE" who claim themselves to be rajput but dont have any proof.

similarly how can rajputs ignore "ZORAWAR SINGH" and "GULAB SINGH" the two brilliant dogra rajputs whose name used to strike fear among muslims the reason why "SRINAGAR" is with india and not with pakistan are these "DOGRA RAJPUTS" you have included karan singh name but not his famous ancestor gulab singh.122.161.9.103 (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Therefore their is no question of those deletion the maratha rajput origin has been long proven and was confirmed by many old persian documents and many other sources and i know those people who are behind these deletion but with a general agreement of GS SARDESAI and many more scholars we can assume that "SEVERAL MARATHA CLANS ARE RAJPUTS" though to save with 100% authenticity that which maratha is rajput and which is not will be difficult but general statement "SEVERAL MARATHA FAMILIES ARE RAJPUTS" by a noted scholar and their are many other evdiences which prove rajput origin of several maratha clans.122.161.214.50 (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Shivraj Singh Chouhan C.M. Of Madhya Pradesh

Is Shivraj Singh Chouhan C.M. Of Madhya Pradesh, a Rajput. As his caste as referenced Kirar is an Thakur caste and many like Ahir, Jat, Gujjar, they also claim to be Rajput or Kshatriya. Chauhan, Yadav etc. are the surnames used by kirars in Madhya Pradesh. Please clarify? thanxmahensingha 06:52, 23 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahensingha (talk • contribs)

Rajput is not a caste, it is only collection of various castes such as sisodia rajputs originates from gujjars, rathores are from south indian low castes, bhati rajputs are from yadav . Rajput is only collection of different sub clans from different castes(similar to maratha , maratha are no caste but include brahmin,kshatriya,vaishya,dalits and tribals)106.208.227.131 (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Still, this fact remains fact that Mr. Shivraj Singh Chouhan belongs to "Kirar (Chobdar)" caste group and is an kshatriya Leader. He by no means is a Rajput Leader. No matter how many Rajputs cite his name for their present glorification. Also, i raised this question because none of the similar caste group leaders are included in this list, owing to the discussion going on in the other sections of this page. mahensingha 10:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahensingha (talk • contribs)

Firstly Rajputs are not a collection of castes, they are a part of kshatriya caste of the Hindu caste system. Everybody in MP knows this I don't know nobody has yet changed it. Please do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.59.223.184 (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2015

Jas.rathore (talk) 10:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC) sir i am jasbir singh. sir i have research for rajput king and i have found a famous king who was JAIMAL SINGH RATHORE who had born १५६४ . he was most great warrior of rajput. i can proov it with small story. he was firht with great king akbar for chittor. rana udai singh entrusted chittor to jaimal rathore for save his. rathore have a small solidary. he was not scared and battle with akbar. a time come when akbar scared to jaimal bravery. jaimal have a small solidary and he gave his sacrified.. akbar was so astonished to jaimal bravery and he made a statue of jaimal singh rathore. sir plzz add jaimal singh rathore on list of rajput.

thanku

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Subject for in sports

Please add for ajay jadeja and ravindra jadeja he is a rajput Thakur Nitin Chauhan (talk) 16:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

And add filmstar in add for thakur anoop Singh and sushant singh rajput and sonal chauhan Thakur Nitin Chauhan (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Vanraj Chavda

Chavdas descent from Chap Gurjar Dynasty and they were not Rajputs. Moreover, as per the wikipedia article on Rajputs, its evident that the Rajput only rose to prominance after the 16th century and hence none of the Rulers prior to this perios should be termed as a Rajput

The Real Rana (talk) 04:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Rameez Raja

I have a source in which Pakistani cricketer Rameez Raja self-identified himself a Rajput but the source requires paid subscription.Rajanrao Shankar (talk)

Which one? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

== More Protection Required ==

Hello wiki community i think we need More protection For this Page As its been attacked many times by Hate Monger and Caste promoters even on historical subjects. Please add protection where only Admin can edit this page. Its a request.Hardcore Legend Mic Foley (talk) 02:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

== Readding Request== == Removal of Historic Figure ==

Hello Fylindfotberserk recently a user agaim removed the image of Prithviraj Chauhan even from List of Rajputs page kindly readd his photo Such things are misguidng at best ,This was well sourced its a request.Hardcore Legend Mic Foley (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC) Also most of the rulers are from 12 th century in this page why remove long standing consensus on This Page Please keep the page in check.Despite the fact that Senior editor Abhishek readd Prithviraj Chauhan.Hardcore Legend Mic Foley (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC) Blocked sock Chariotrider555 (talk) 05:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 May 2021

Hello, This article about list of Rajputs excludes many notable historic member of Rajput caste that includes Prithviraj Chauhan, Hammir Dev Chauhan of Ranthambore. I guess name of Prithviraja was in list before a notorious vandal named as Chariotrider removed it. (Who try to distort Rajput history mainly). After I went through his account, I found that he might be operating multiple accounts too. So, Its my humble request to responsible editors who have this page on their watchlost to add Prithviraj Chauhan in Historic Figures list. There are endless sources for same, As all learned authors mentioned him as Rajput. @Ratnahastin and Shinjoya: You both heavily edit these article. So, Please include the names requested above.

Here is a reliable source with quotes:

• Satish Chandra (1996). Historiography, Religion, and State in Medieval India. Har-Anand Publications. ISBN 978-81-241-0035-6.

• Quote:- How far Rajput militory organization changed to adapt to new condition is obvious from the fact that the battle of Tarain between Rajput Prithvi Raj and Shihabuddin Ghori was mainly a fight of cavalryman armed with bows and spears 2402:3A80:969:F22:7A68:91F6:F0C1:A9E7 (talk) 11:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

 Note: From Prithviraj Chauhan: Prithviraj's dynasty was classified as one of the Rajput clans in the later period, including in Prithviraj Raso, although the 'Rajput' identity did not exist during his time. (referring to ~1190 CE). TGHL ↗ 🍁 15:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

My Response

@TheGoodAndHolyLord: This is copied text from his main article which is highly dubious. Cynthia tablot, the author of this book never visited India and forget visiting, She didn't even quote footnotes or inscriptions for her bogous claims. She isn't end all and be all on Prithviraj. Anyone who knows Indian history, Know that fact that Prithviraj is well-established as Rajput king.

Anyway, I do have aceadmic sources which shows that people call themsleves Rajput even in 6th century. (So, How such identity didn't exist at time of late 12th century king ???)

Do anyone need sources ???? I can add 5-6 works of famous authors.17:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

List of six sources

A. Barbara N. Ramusack (2003). The Indian Princes and their States, The New Cambridge History of India. Cambridge University Press. p. 14. ISBN 9781139449083. Here is first one from Barbara N. Ramusack a well known historian and scholar. Quote:- By the sixth century, There are historical evidences of people calling themselves Rajput begins to settle in Indo-Gangetic Plain. Over the course of ten centuries they came to control land and people.... If there are historical evidences of people themselves calling them Rajputs, How Such identity don't exist 500 years later ???? Need more ?? B. Irfan Habib (2008). Medieval India: The Study of Civilization. National Book Trust. ISBN 978-81-237-5255-6. This source from Irfan Habib is bit costly therefore I am providing suitable quotes here Quote:- After going through several inscriptions particularly In the Mahoba fort (actually from Kasrak near Badaun) in an entry of 1234, The Rautas are spoken of as a Jati or caste, Rauta is actually the Prakrit form of Rajaputra (In Hindi, Rajput caste) and a Rajput caste had established itself well before 13th century C. Upinder Singh (2011-03-10). Rethinking Early Medieval India. OUP India. ISBN 978-0-19-807002-3. Same issue costly source, therefore suitable quotes Quote:- The use of term Rajput for specific clans or as a collective term for all Rajput clans begins by 12th century D. Upinder Singh (1999). Ancient Delhi. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-564919-2. This source is available which clearly mentioned Minhaj U Siraj (court historian of Muhmmad Ghori call Prithviraj as Rajput, quote for same) Quote Minhaj U Siraj's narrates the defeat of Prithviraja in Second battle of Tarain. He narrates that The Rajput king who was riding an horse.... E. Sara R. Farris (2013-09-05). Max Weber’s Theory of Personality: Individuation, Politics and Orientalism in the Sociology of Religion. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-25409-1. A renowned sociologist and scholar Farris also observed that by Eight century Rajputs begin to perform the fuctions that belongs to Kshatriya. So there must be caste group in Eight century already. Quote:- In about the eight century the Rajput thus began to perform the functions that had formerly belonged to the Kshatriya, assuming their social and economic position and substituting them as the new warrior class F. Eugenia Vanina (2012). Medieval Indian Mindscapes: Space, Time, Society, Man. Primus Books. ISBN 978-93-80607-19-1. Russian Inodologist Eugenia Vanina believes that first reference to Rajput clans were made in Seventh and Eight century. Long before time span of subject. Quote By the period of seventh–eights centuries AD when the first references to the Rajput clans and their chieftains were made

Now, I am going to sleep. GN folks. 2402:8100:2162:CEA7:D9E2:452:83B1:BE90 (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Great citations, IP, I stand corrected. I am not familiar in the area myself but it appears many sources acknowledge there were Rajputs in this era. If Prithviraj were to show up on this list, the main article would have to be edited to reflect that. A blurb would have to be written for this article, still, but from the main article we can gather: Prithviraj Chauhan, king from the Chahamana dynasty who ruled Sapadalaksha (present-day north-western India). Not much, but a start – would this work? TGHL ↗ 🍁 23:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@TheGoodAndHolyLord: I agree with you here. The main article too should be accomodated for this addition which is well-sourced. These are just six sources, I have multiple more for the same also. Anyway, We can just add the name of King here too; But major problem here is these days there aren't many socialized editors like you. What I saw are group of vandals in Rajput related topics who tries their level best to somehow distort Rajput past. Do you know recently a lot of content have been removed by Chairotrider on Rajput resistance to Muslim Conquestsarticle too ???? It seems they have a narrative as its not uncommon to distort history of Rajputs (Obviois jealousy from a major social group of South asia)

Heba Aisha, LukeEmily, Charitorider (probably worst), SpacemanEmily, Ravnesfire are such group of editors who back each other edits and revert all contributions outside of that with reason like poor sources (Although there are aceadmic sources for same), block evasion etc.

So, Can you now Please add the name here ?? If, not I will log-in in few days myself, But since article is protected, I will be hard for me to edit then too. Thanks and have a good time ahead. 2402:8100:2167:C463:3F2F:3D2E:F800:F00E (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done in revision 1025159716. I included the original citation and the fourth one (letter 'D') you listed, as they both mention Prithviraj by name. As for the vandalism: are there any specific diffs you can provide that show this? It may require administrator intervention. (By "diffs", I mean edits in the "history" page – copy the URL of "prev.") TGHL ↗ 🍁 02:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Hail the triumph of Rajputisation! It's rather hard for someone to be part of something that didn't exist until several hundred years after. You can see multiple discussion above about this. Shrug - not going to fight it, the caste pushing is frankly insanely tiring and not worth putting up with the repeated BS. Ravensfire (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

@TheGoodAndHolyLord: Thanks, One more request is you add his name in nearly bottom section; Earlier the name was on first place which it should be as per chornology order of ruler as Prithviraj belongs to late 12th century,

Also Install this image of Prithviraj Chauhan

File:Prithvi Raj Chauhan (Edited).jpg,

Then Rana Sanga image and at last Maharana Pratap image. (Also Veer Kunwar Singh and Durgadas Rathore image) (In order)

It will be very beneficial, If you first add image of this 5 figures and then written names in chornology order of kings. (Everything seems fine apart from Prithviraj name which should be at No.1 after Rawal Jaiswal as per reign of Kings). Please do it too and Thanks again.2402:8100:2167:C463:CE83:3B1D:A3B2:2EC7 (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done in revision 1025163391: moved to second position (reign of Rawal Jaisal Singh is earlier), added blurb at top of section for chronology. I did not add the statue, though, as there are already too many photos for the size of the list already (the photos were hanging into other sections and offsetting their photos on my desktop view). I can imagine it must not look good on the mobile site with them breaking up the list, so they were moved to the top. TGHL ↗ 🍁 02:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

@TheGoodAndHolyLord: Thanks again. However, I still supports the addition of statue of PRC (Prithvirah Chauhan). Please do it before Rana Sanga as he is a major historic figure of community with caption Statue of Prithviraj Chauhan. Please do so. 2409:4051:4EBE:45F7:AA81:97E1:3690:5470 (talk) 03:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done as per requestRatnahastin (talk) 03:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

@TheGoodAndHolyLord and Ratnahastin: Thanks again to both of you for this cooperation and assuming good-faith through. However, I still wants a small typo i.e. Instead of caption Statue of Prithviraj Chauhan, Please change it to Prithviraj Chauhan, King of Ajmer or Prithviraj Chauhan of Ajmer like in other images (e.g Rana Sanga, King of Mewar). Please do it and close this discussion. Cheers folks. 2402:8100:2245:836E:78EB:13CB:4545:19D6 (talk) 14:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done as per requestRatnahastin (talk) 14:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear admin, Madhav Sinh Solanki in politician and Anandpal in criminal list aren't part of Rajput community. Pls remove the two. RS6784 (talk) 11:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Untitled

Plz also Add Air Marshal Waqas Ahmed Sulehri and

Air Chief Marshal , Mujahid Anwar Khan ( Rajput Sulehria ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.147.233 (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2023 (2)

Kindly add Anangpal Tomar of the Tomar Rajput dynasty who ruled and populated Delhi during the 11th century.

Source: 1. Singh, Upinder (1999). Ancient Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 92–93. ISBN 978-0-19-564919-2 2. K. A. Nizami (22 February 2020). Delhi in Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-19-099190-6. According to these inscription, Anangpal of the Tomar Rajputs founded Delhi between 1053 and 1109 AD. It refers to Delhi as Dehlu, a name that has endured and resurfaced at various points of time during its long history 103.211.18.43 (talk) 16:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

This could be subject to WP:GSCASTE, so seek consensus before making an edit request. DreamRimmer (talk) 11:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Whats the problem with Anangpal Tomar, I don't understand what's controversial. Everyone knows and all book mention him to be Rajput ruler of Tomar clan. Can you please elaborate the problem. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. -Lemonaka‎ 01:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

There are enough references attached that tell that Anangpal Tomar was a Rajput ruler of Tomar clan to have ruled re-populated and ruled Delhi. Kindly add his name to the list. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DreamRimmer (talk) 04:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Source:

1. Singh, Upinder (1999). Ancient Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 92–93. ISBN 978-0-19-564919-2

2. K. A. Nizami (22 February 2020). Delhi in Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-19-099190-6. "According to these inscription, Anangpal of the Tomar Rajputs founded Delhi between 1053 and 1109 AD. It refers to Delhi as Dehlu, a name that has endured and resurfaced at various points of time during its long history"

3. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/up-warrior-village-anangpal-tomar-birthday-agnipath-rollback-1978027-2022-07-21 : last paragrah Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 19:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

 Already done DreamRimmer (talk) 13:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

ADD THE NAME OF BRIG RAJENDRA SINGHJI DOGRA

The man who fought against 30,000 tribal soldiers(many of them were regular pakistani soldiers with disguise) with only 150 soldiers in 1947 in URI cannot be ignored INDIAN ARMY calls this the indian version of 300 VS 1 MILLION. For two days 30,000 tribals supported by heavy firing from pakistani army cannot cross 150 Dogra soldiers at URI.(the bridge was destroyed in fierce fighting).http://www.pranseth.com/Home/chapter-12

The praise by Mountabatten also shows the bravery of this great DOGRA RAJPUT who must be remembered as among the greatest 20th century soldiers. For 2 days he fought against 30,000 tribals(plus the INDIAN MUSLIMS who deserted dogra army and pakistani army). 122.161.70.126 (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

If you find some decent modern reliable sources then you could create an article for him, perhaps using our WP:AFC facility if you are uncertain of how to begin. If he was indeed a Rajput and that is sourced in your article then, sure, he can be added to this list. I must say that I find your description astonishing: if he did what you say then I would have expected us already to have something about him, so you might also want to check first to see if an article has been created under another name. For example, the "ji" suffix is usually an honorific rather than a part of a person's real name. - Sitush (talk) 17:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

The article for Rajinder Singh Brigadier is already created. I request to add his name.10:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. We still need a source that he was a Rajput. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 00:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 May 2020

Chauhry Nisar Ali Khan (Chaudhary Nisar Ali Khan) former Interior Minitser of Pakistan 39.42.147.136 (talk) 19:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

References

• Note that this project requires self-identification for associating a living person with a caste – see here for one of the relevant discussions. And the source provided here does not meet this requirement. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sceptre (talk) 01:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add actor Rituraj Singh

Rituraj Singh No2WesternImperialism (talk) 07:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

References

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 June 2023

Kindly add Khudadad Khan, the first British Raj subject to earn the Victoria Cross, after members of the British Indian Army became eligible for the Victoria Cross in 1911, replacing the Indian Order of Merit first class.

Reference:

1. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/paving-stone-laid-for-pakistani-born-first-world-war-hero

2. https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/598326 Wikipedia mirror --Xan747

3. https://www.royal-prince.co.uk/home/explore/royal-rajput-collection/Does not support requested edit -- Xan747

4. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/victoria-cross.html?chrome=1 103.211.18.77 (talk) 03:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done I struck two of your citations as noted above. I left out mention of the Indian Order of Merit as not relevant. Xan747 (talk) 22:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 June 2023

Kindly remove Chander Kumar from the list. The given reference does not mention him belonging to Rajput community but from OBC. Kindly check the given reference once, the mention of Rajput caste is for other leaders. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 11:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: 1. The article title and lede says all entries are Rajputs. 2. According to Other Backward Class, Rajput is an OBC. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Kindly refer to this line in start of the article: Four of the seven ministers hail from the Rajput community, while one each is from Schedule Tribe (ST), Other Backward Caste (OBC), and Schedule Caste (SC).

Therefore, Chander Kumar is not OBC and Rajput at the same time, he is an OBC leader as given in the article.

Also, according to Other Backward Class, Rajputs come under OBC only from Karnataka while the person being discussed is from Uttarakhand. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 07:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

 Done Agree that given source did not support inclusion in the list and removed him accordingly. Xan747 (talk) 23:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Correction for Jitendra Singh

The politician Jitendra Singh's link has been mistakenly directed to the politician Jitendra_Singh_(politician,_born_1971) whose name has already beem mentioned, making twice reference to same name. Kindly correct it. Also [[Jitendra_Singh_(politician,_born_1956) doesn't belongs to the Jammu Royal family as written in the description, kindly see the reference article clearly, its for another politician. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 11:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.

It is very frustrating that you don't specify exactly the changes you want made. You will get faster responses if you use the following format to request edits. Editors will be very thankful if you write the modifications as WP:Wikitext so that it can be pasted straight into the article.

FROM: Jitendra Singh (politician, born 1971), Bharatiya Janata Party politician from Jammu and Kashmir, member of the Jammu and Kashmir Royal Family.

TO:

FROM: Jitendra Singh (politician, born 1971), Indian National Congress politician from Rajasthan, member of the Alwar Royal Family.

TO:

Thanks, Xan747 (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

References

FROM: Jitendra Singh (politician, born 1971), Bharatiya Janata Party politician from Jammu and Kashmir, member of the Jammu and Kashmir Royal Family.

TO: Jitendra Singh (politician, born 1956), Bharatiya Janata Party politician from Jammu and Kashmir and minister in Narendra Modi government. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 07:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

References

 Done

Please note that creating citations containing only a URL as you did is strongly discouraged. This is because a proper citation gives the reader more information, and if the URL goes dead, gives editors a better chance of locating the reference elsewhere.

You can read about the various citation templates at Wikipedia:Citation templates. However, creating citations manually can be tedious, and various tools exist to make the process easier. My favorite is to use Wikipedia:VisualEditor--it contains a wizard that creates proper citations from pasting a URL, though often some manual editing is required.

Annoyingly it doesn't work on talk pages. For that, if you're in edit source mode, click on the Cite dropdown, and select Templates. It will give you a form to fill out manually, which I still find easier to use than manually editing a template. Xan747 (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)