User talk:Kshatriya Yoddha

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kshatriya Yoddha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for disruptive editing and for persisting with my views despite not reaching consensus. I have taken time some time off twitter and ensure you that I have learnt from my mistakes and will be more sensitive, accommodating and flexible. I won't repeat my mistakes again and prove to be a worthy contributor and member of this community. Kindly give me one last chance. Regards. Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 09:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure about how your time on Twitter/X is relevant(perhaps you misspoke). I'm unwilling to unblock you to edit in the contentious topics area of South Asian social groups/castes; you clearly are too invested in that subject area to be able to participate in it. If you want to edit about other topics, please tell what and we can consider unblocking you. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ya, I meant time off 'wikipedia'. Since I am from South Asia and have knowledge relevant to it, I would be able to constructively be able to contribute in it only. I can contribute on many other historical figures, sports and economic topics. If you deem me unfit for editing caste related topics, can I be allowed to edit other sections? Regards.

Creating an account minutes after being blocked isn't the soundest of strategies. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also acknowledge the user's harassing comments they made.

The user (Kshatriya Yoddha) made this comment to me: "Cope harder sub-narmada pajeet... and sulk when you see a tall, fair, handsome north-Indian munda flex his muscles infront of mallu and tulu chicks... should i send u a fair&lovely... will help u :) Kshatriya Yoddha (talk) 08:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)"

You can find it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kshatriya_Yoddha&oldid=1170172642 No2WesternImperialism (talk) 07:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vijaypala

Hello, Kshatriya Yoddha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vijaypala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vijayapal

The article Vijayapal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly referenced WP:OR mess, RS do not appear to mention Vijayapal at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rajput Dynasties of Medieval India & Pakistan

Hello, Kshatriya Yoddha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajput Dynasties of Medieval India & Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]