User talk:Rajanrao Shankar

Welcome!

Hello, Rajanrao Shankar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. An edit that you recently made to GiantsVision seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rajanrao Shankar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rajanrao Shankar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D.k. Thakur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on D.k. Thakur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Captain Calm (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Radhika Pandit, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Note also that caste labels require self-identification, as not everybody adheres to this identity system. See the discussion histories here. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Ok no problem.Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Kom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC) DPL bot Ok but I have read the whole interview and it described her a Christian.Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 06:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Digvijay Singh bihar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Digvijay Singh bihar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Rajju Bhaiyya.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rajju Bhaiyya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ,but I don't know how to use it MifterBot and I just uploads pic.Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Rajju Bhaiyya.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rajju Bhaiyya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Asin Wirathu.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Asin Wirathu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/news-photo/monk-wirathu-is-the-founder-of-the-widely-criticized-anti-news-photo/185767144?adppopup=true. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rajju Bhaiyya.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rajju Bhaiyya.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Digvijay Singh bihar.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Digvijay Singh bihar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://news.rediff.com/special/2010/jun/28/specials-aseem-chhabra-remembers-digvijay-singh.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Taapsee Pannu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suresh Chavhanke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPSC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Caste in WP:BLPs

You seem to be adding caste-related details in a lot of articles. Note that you can mention caste in a WP:BLP only if the subject self-identifies with it – see here for details. BTW, this advise is regarding your edits like this one. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respected in most of the cases it is self-identified and in other they are from Autobiographies and Biographies of them.Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Boris Johnson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boris Johnson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rajanrao Shankar -- Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 05:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rajanrao Shankar, you are not supposed to nominate articles for GA unless you are a significant contributor (you have never edited the article), unless you've consulted with the major contributors first on the article talk page. And you are never, ever supposed to review you an article that you yourself has nominated. I am reverting your nomination, which was out of process, and have requested that your review page be deleted, since self-reviews are not allowed.

I would like to suggest that you wait until you have a great deal more experience at Wikipedia before you return to the GA nomination space, and that you first get used to working on editing articles and bringing them up to GA standards and going through having your article reviewed by someone else so you know how it works. I'd also recommend carefully perusing both the GA criteria and the GA nomination instructions, which explain about nominating and reviewing and how the processes work. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Boris Johnson

The article Boris Johnson you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Boris Johnson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rajanrao Shankar -- Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 06:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sushant Singh Rajput

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You should also be aware that matters relating to caste are divisive and problematic. Caste requires self-identification and must be attributed to a reliable source, which you did not do here, as blogs are totally insufficient as references per WP:UGC. I also notice that you've previously been apprised of this, so please stop adding caste unless you have satisfied the community's expectations, which I have elaborated on here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respected,Cyphoidbomb I have wrote his caste and taking it from article, where he defines the same. And in Sushant Singh Rajput caste case I have done the same. And that if you want I can source his interview for the sameRajanrao Shankar (talk) 02:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an article, that's a blog. And even if that were an article, the word "caste" does not appear anywhere in it. So you are making a supposition about his caste identity that he does not explicitly say, which is a real problem. If someone said "I am a Blacksmith", does that mean that they are identifying with their family name of Blacksmith, or are they saying that they manufacture tools out of iron? If the meaning is unclear, we are not allowed to decide what it means. And just because someone's last name is identical to a caste, doesn't mean that the person identifies as part of that caste. There are a lot of people who don't participate in caste identification, including Amitabh Bachchan. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok next time I would be more careful Cyphoidbomb. With kind regards Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 03:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electoral history of Narendra Modi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Electoral history of Narendra Modi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rajanrao Shankar -- Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important warning regarding GA nominations

Rajanrao Shankar, eight days ago I posted here, noting that you are not supposed to nominate articles for GA if you are not a significant contributor, unless you've consulted with the major contributors first on the article talk page. Today, I see that you have nominated Electoral history of Narendra Modi, an article where the only edit you have made was to add a template. That is far from significant, and you should not have made the nomination.

Further, as I told you last time, when you did so with Boris Johnson, you are never, ever supposed to review an article that you yourself have nominated. Yet you have done so again. That's a fundamental conflict-of-interest, and completely unacceptable at GAN.

It is very clear that you do not understand the GA nominating and reviewing process, and your continuing attempts to participate are causing problems. Last time, I suggested that you wait until you have a great deal more experience at Wikipedia before you return to the GA nomination space. This time, it's more than a suggestion; it's clear that you need months more knowledge and experience, and you need it before you return. (It's also clear that your attempt to read and understand the GA criteria and GA nomination instructions pages was unsuccessful, unless you just ignored the suggestion entirely.)

I will be reverting your nomination of Electoral history of Narendra Modi, and arranging to have the review page deleted. I have checked your other GA nominations, and two of them, while thank goodness you haven't opened reviews, are nevertheless articles where you are not a significant contributor, so I am reverting the nominations: Rajendrasinhji Jadeja and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena. As it says in the GA nomination instructions, Step 1 under Nominating, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.

Your remaining nomination, of Vishwanath Pratap Singh, I have not reverted, because you made significant contributions to that article. However, you will wish to have it copyedited if you want to avoid it being quickfailed once a reviewer chooses it: there are quite a few problems with grammar and sentence structure in the material you added.

So the warning is this: you need to only nominate articles you have either done a lot of work on (and not just citations, but a significant amount of work on the article prose itself), or where you have consulted on the article's talk page prior to nominating. If you keep nominating articles in a manner against the GA instructions, or if you ever open another review of an article you nominated, you may lose your privileges involving participating in the GA nomination process. I very much hope it doesn't come to that. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electoral history of Narendra Modi

The article Electoral history of Narendra Modi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Electoral history of Narendra Modi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rajanrao Shankar -- Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajanrao Shankar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Multiple Abuse, I dont know why the user SandDoctor has blocked me indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. I don't even know who is Amrapahal Pahanswan and still I am blocked Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 04:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address the specific concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amrapahal Pahanswan. Yamla (talk) 10:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla, I really don't know what's the procedure it is and I am aware that there is an investigation notice, but this time without any strong reason I am blocked. And it was a very difficult way for me to complete 500 and above edits and Wikipedia shouldn't treat their new editors like this.Rajanrao Shankar (talk) 02:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The procedure is that you address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amrapahal Pahanswan. WP:GAB will help you understand how to write an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]