User talk:Ashokharsana

Pratihara

In the article Pratihara, you added the information that Pratiharas are called "Gurjara-Pratiharas" in all their inscriptions, and it has been confirmed that they were Gurjars. I went through the reference that you cited -- I couldn't find such information. In your citation, you had given the page numbers as "Pages 1-32". I went through all these pages, and they don't even mention Pratiharas. These pages contain three articles on unrelated topics:

Article I: Description on the various classes of vessels constructed and employed by the Natives of the Coasts of Coromandel, Malabar and the Island of Ceylon, for their Coastal navigation (p. 1-14)
Article II: Remarks on the school system of the Hindus (p. 15-19)
Article III: Dissertation on the River Indus. (p. 20-44)

Can you please provide the exact page number, and if possible, quote some text?

Also, please use attributions. For example, one should not use sweeping statements like "There is no conclusive proof that the Agnikula Rajput clans are of Gurjara origin;" or "Pratiharas were certainly of Gurjara (or Gujjar) origin". Instead, the statements should be attributed: "H. A. Rose and Ibbetson stated that there is no conclusive proof that the Agnikula Rajput clans are of Gurjara origin;" and "Vincent Smith believed that the Pratiharas were certainly of Gurjara (or Gujjar) origin". Thanks. utcursch | talk 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Khetrapal

A tag has been placed on Khetrapal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Rajputs and Gurjars

It is well recorded in indian history that all the rajput royal clans (chauhan, tomar etc) were actually derived from Gurjars, please see the followinf reference

Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

By Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland Published 1834 The Society Original from the University of California Digitized Mar 16, 2007 Page No. 5 or see it on http://www.allempires.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=20468

Speedy deletion of List of Gujjars

A tag has been placed on List of Gujjars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Menti sock 09:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Vehicle insurance do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
• c-ar-insurance.blogspot.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.c-ar-insurance.blogspot.com
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maharana Pratap may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[India]] in the present day state of [[Rajasthan]]. He belonged to the [[Sisodiya]] sept of Rajputs(origintaed from Guhils, who in tuen origintaed from [[Gurjar]]s<ref>{{cite book| last=Sarkar|first=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harsana

The article Harsana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources discuss this community. It appears to be just another Indic name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 08:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rajput, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

This removal is unacceptable. You may not like to see Gurjars conjoined with Ahirs etc and/or described as cultivators but the statement is reliably sourced. You didn't supply a reason for the removal but I can't think of one that would be valid anyway. You really need to get a grip on the information contained at WP:NPOV because I see you failing to comprehend at Talk:Origin of the Gurjara-Pratiharas also. Sitush (talk) 10:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Rajput. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You removed my comment with this edit made 19 minutes later. That is not an edit conflict, although I suppose it could be carelessness. I have reverted you and you will have to reinstate your point below mine. Please also remember to sign your posts - see WP:SIG regarding how to do this. - Sitush (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was done by mistake because of 2 pages opened simultaneously. I just happened to see that you are unwell, not the right time to ask so many questions maybe. Get well soon dear. Won't bother you anymore today :-) .The Real Rana (talk) 11:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Origin of the Gurjara-Pratiharas. Sitush (talk) 07:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

topic banned for six months from any edits related to Gurjar, Rajput in particular and to anything related to caste and social groups as well as historical kingdoms. This sanction applies across all name spaces on the English Wikipedia.

You have been sanctioned for repeated disruptive editing and an unwillingness to listen to any advice and an inability to edit collaboratively or comply with our policies and guidelines

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —SpacemanSpiff 08:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These edits are a violation of your topic ban. I'm letting this go now but any further violations will result in a block. —SpacemanSpiff 09:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked on my talk page: You can not edit about Gurjars, Rajputs, or any other caste or social group or any historical kingdom, anywhere on the English Wikipedia. This includes, but is not limited to articles, talk pages, user talk pages (including your own), templates, etc. —SpacemanSpiff 09:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Jankibai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gujar

Prataprao Gujar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gujar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Swami and Friends, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:42, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashokharshana . I want to clear a doubt. Please provide me your email ID or reply me at gewinnagar@gmail.com Gewingewin (talk) 15:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

It appears that you are now back to adding conspiracy theories and the like around Gurjars. You've been warned and topic banned for this behavior in the past. If this continues, your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 03:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, saying that we find “Chauhaan and tomars” in Gurjars is a part of some conspiracy theory my dear mod?

What should we do then to prove that Chauhan and Tomars are two common surnames used by Gurjars ? Pls tell this to the Ex member of parliament Sanjay Singh Chauhan that you Wikipedia doesn’t consider them as Gurjars or doesn’t consider them to exist at all?

You know it’s soon going to be the reason of fued among two communities in India on the onset of a movie “Prithviraj chauhan”. Wikipedia article saying there are no Chauhan Gurjars might be the center point of argument for this feud. Why shouldn’t we Gurjars sue Wikipedia in Indian court for misinforming people and causing this feud?

It’s a humble request. Your banning me isn’t the solution. Why don’t you read and dig out the truth for yourself sothat you can provide people with the truth and not the fabricated theories that were made popular to obliterate one particular group that was against the British. The Real Rana (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The legendary epic Prithviraj Raso mentioned Someshvara, father of Prithviraj Chauhan, as a Gurjar on page 22 of the original Prithviraj Raso Version. Please see the following link:

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-56a6e141affeb94756c01ffe7c5d82b3 The Real Rana (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC) The Real Rana (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]