Talk:Lichfield Angel
Appearance
A fact from Lichfield Angel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 8th-century Lichfield Angel (reconstruction pictured) was originally decorated with brightly coloured pigments? Source: "it was made at the end of the eighth century" from page 17 of: Wilcox, Dr Pete (2011). The Gold, the Angel and the Gospel Book. Wenlock, Shropshire: RJL Smith & Associates. ISBN 978-0-9558887-7-9.There is a description of the pigments used (and a reconstruction of how they would have looked) in Geary, Angela; Howe, Emily (September 2009). "Three‐dimensional documentation and virtual restoration of the Lichfield Angel". Journal of the Institute of Conservation. 32 (2): 165–179. doi:10.1080/19455220903059875. ISSN 1945-5224.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hosanna Meeting House
- Comment: There are photos of the actual piece in the article but in one the fragments are separated and the other is through a display case so not as clear
Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC).
- mostly fine (dating, length, sourcing etc), but would go with its discovery as a more interesting hook. The lead image is exceptional, to promoting admin please bump, and great to see this here. Ceoil (talk) 03:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Ceoil, thanks for your review and CE of the article. For a hook on its discover how's the following? - Dumelow (talk) 06:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the 8th-century Lichfield Angel (reconstruction pictured) was discovered beneath the floor of Lichfield Cathedral in 2003?
- Hi Dumelow, that would get my attention and click through. ps, love the article. Ceoil (talk) 08:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Noting the ALT1 hook is supported by the British Museum ref: Lichfield Angel: Late 8th or early 9th century, but would add dating (which may influence the hook) and size in lead, and maybe even, shock/horor, an "infobox artefact". Ceoil (talk) 08:37, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Location?
[edit]The page does not clearly state where the Angel is shown - is it in the Chapter House? Nedrutland (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
- Unknown-importance Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
- All WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms pages
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Unknown-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class West Midlands articles
- Unknown-importance West Midlands articles
- WikiProject West Midlands
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject Europe's 10,000 Challenge