Talk:Iridion 3D

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Iridion 3D article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Iridion 3D" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Iridion 3D is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 29, 2010.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 24, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
February 26, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 15, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 24, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Weak Pass Prose seems written well enough, but I have a few suggestions. There are some commas where commas aren't needed (such as before the word and) and articles tend to flow better without brackets.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail I'm reluctant to pass an article with so few unreferenced statements. There are entire sections that only have one reference.

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Very Comprehensive for a little-known video game.

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass Article seems to be written from a neutral point of view.

5. Article stability? Pass Seems to be stable.

6. Images?: Pass Good use of images.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Scorpion 05:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking pretty good at this point. I'd say do another copy edit, then try for GA again. -- Scorpion 00:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New GA review

All of my previous suggestions have been implemented, so I grant this article GA status. Great job! This article is very comprehensive for a little-known flop, more comprehensive than many articles for the "franchise" games. One small question, would it be possible to add at least one source to the lead? I don't think sources in the lead are a necessity for a GA, but I would prefer to see at least one.

Cape Feare, an article I have been working on is currently a GAC, and if you could review it for me it would be much appreciated. Thanks for the time, Scorpion 18:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference material

Found this: Game Informer review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the find. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]