Talk:Hitman 3

Hitman 3 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 28, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Melee (game terminology) (0 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Title

As per the developer's website and the official announcement trailer as well as other official channels, the proper name of this game is Hitman 3; it's merely stylized as Hitman III in marketing materials. -JFWillson (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I thought this, too. I filed a case with WP:RMT. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 13:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy controversy

There were/are issues with the transfer of previously purchased levels and the transfer of progress. That may have caused a stir, covered by reliable sources, however that's not a controversy. Now if someone disagrees with my edit to rename that section and that becomes a prolonged and public disagreement with lots of edit warring... that would be a controversy ;-) In this case there's no public disagreement between opposing factions. Just IOI not being particularly clever about things. PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 22:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

internet required or not ?

In new games, especially this, this information is important and should be added generally to all games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.211.93 (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hitman 2016 and Hitman 2

What will happen to their respective articles?

They will both be retroactively considered parts of a single game in January 26. 80.60.107.130 (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the scale of those two, the content should either be left up independently or very carefully folded into this article. Hitman 2016, in particular, has a rather large article. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They won't be folded into this article. They used to be separate games, and IO's recent move to combine all three games doesn't change that. OceanHok (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article and headline name

With the announcement that the game is to be renamed Hitman: World of Assassination, what name should the article use? I personally am in favor of keeping the name as Hitman 3 and having the headline be something like "Hitman 3 (later re-titled Hitman: World of Assassination)..." similar to the articles for the first three Star Wars movies. PolarManne (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE copy edit

I have a few comments:

Review MOS:SAID. The article also tended to use "adding that" a lot, including in instances of a non sequiturs.
I recommend cutting the summary of reviews in the "Critical reception" section. Keep only the key parts of reviews or condense.
Many of the quotes can be paraphrased or significantly cut down.
After all of that, this should probably be copy edited again.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hitman 3/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll begin a read through shortly. ♦ jaguar 14:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do this often, but I am compelled to give this an outright pass. It is well-written, comprehensive and simply put, presents itself as a fully-fledged good article. It is well referenced and all the sources check out from what I can see. You might consider nominating this at FAC. I've made a couple of minor adjustments too - feel free to check over. Well done, as usual a sterling article from you! ♦ jaguar 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]