Jump to content

Talk:Hitman 2 (2018 video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambig title needed?

[edit]

I don't think this needs to be disambiguated. "Hitman 2" with a hatnote for Silent Assassin is sufficiently different from "Hitman 2: Silent Assassin". --Masem (t) 18:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 June 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus below L293D ( • ) 14:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Hitman 2 (2018 video game)Hitman 2 – Currently, Hitman 2 redirects to Hitman 2 (2018 video game), which has a hatnote linking to Hitman 2: Silent Assassin. There is no reason for Hitman 2 (2018 video game) not being titled Hitman 2. Interqwark talk contribs 22:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: There is also a Hitman (franchise). Editors should figure out the best way to organize the naming of this set of articles. EdJohnston (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Hitman 2" and "Hitman 2: Silent Assassin" are different games (hooray for series reboots). I support this movie given I sorted out the redirects pending an article on this 2018 game. --Masem (t) 23:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Those worried about the incoming links via Hitman 2, [1] shows only 3-4 mainspace links, and all related to the announcement of this game The rest are user pages or a few WP-space pages. Prior to Thursday, where Hitman 2 redirected to "Hitman 2: Silent Assassin", automatic redirect bots would have resolved that, hence the few incoming links to worry about in mainspace. --Masem (t) 13:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Presently, I would say weak oppose per WP:RECENTISM. The redirect was suddenly changed after 15 years too, with no incoming links fixed. I agree that this game is the only one just titled "Hitman 2", but we presently disambiguate "Hitman (2016 video game)" as well. Lordtobi () 07:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lordtobi: We disambiguate the title of Hitman (2016 video game) because there are other things that are also called just “Hitman” or “hitman”, including the franchise, the film, and the term itself, meaning someone who kills people for pay. There are also many other things called “Hitman” or “Hit Man,” as seen on the term’s disambiguation page. However, there is only one thing called Hitman 2, and that is the upcoming sequel to the 2016 Hitman game. Since Silent Assassin has a subtitle and is usually referred to with its subtitle, and the upcoming game is just called Hitman 2, I think it would be a good idea to move Hitman 2 (2018 video game) to Hitman 2 and have a hatnote at the top of the former redirecting the user to Hitman 2: Silent Assassin. A lot of articles will reference Hitman 2, and it would be easier without the disambiguation. In this scenario, neither article would have a disambiguation in their title.
I noticed that you edited Hitman 2, Hitman 2 (2018 video game), and Hitman 2: Silent Assassin. Now, Hitman 2 redirects to Hitman 2: Silent Assassin instead of Hitman 2 (2018 video game). Interqwark talk contribs 12:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the redirect "Hitman 2" targeted Silent Assassin for 15 years, so it shouldn't have been changed in the first place, especially given that no backlink to that redirect were updated. Also by "disambiguating Hitman" I meant that we incoroprate the year although there is no other game "just" called Hitman (the first one had the subtitle "Codename 47"). "Hitman (video game)" currently targets the franchise page, and as Netholic points out, it should probably also target there, but that requires discussion and cleaning up of backlinks. Lordtobi () 13:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Neither game should be at Hitman 2 as it is too easily confusing for readers and editors. Turn Hitman 2 into a short DAB so that we can continue to find and resolve any incoming links to it to the proper games. Also, its WP:TOOSOON to determine if either has a strong WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT claim. Revisit in say 5 years when the initial surge for the 2018 game is over. -- Netoholic @ 07:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Netoholic: A dab with only two entries is unnecessary per WP:2DAB. Interqwark talk contribs 12:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:NOPRIMARY. --Netoholic @ 13:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Netoholic: I haven’t determined which one is the primary topic yet, but I would assume that a disambiguation page isn’t necessary here. Hitman 2 is the exact name of the upcoming game, whereas the 2002 game has a subtitle. Interqwark talk contribs 13:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your requested move is stated at putting the 2018 game at primary. I oppose that per my vote.--Netoholic @ 13:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Primary Topic aspect isn't an issue. We have two games that have a natural distinguishing difference, by title. That falls under WP:PRECISION. And basically because of 2DAB, even if we kept the Hitman 2 redirect, one or both of these pages will still need a hatnote. The other factor to consider is that scraping google news prior to 2015, is that in the bodies of articles that bring up the older Hitman 2 game, they normally refer to it as its full name "Hitman 2: Silent Assassin" (since most of the games in the series came to be known as unnumbered sequels, eg "Hitman: Absolution"). --Masem (t) 13:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Star Wars: Battlefront II is a DAB that begs to differ; it is a similar case although the differentiation between titles is in the lack of a colon rather than a subtitle. 93 (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The image is not compatible with Facebook when sharing for some reason

[edit]

Can someone please just fix this quickly? It will improve the quality and interest of this media on social media when sharing to have an image that actually works when creating a preview of the article ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:2D6B:BC00:4C9B:5940:338F:C584 (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Image compatibility with third-party platforms is not really our responsibility. It is a working JPEG for us and that is really all we need. You can try taking the original image pasting into Gimp, Paint or whatever image tool you have and re-export it. Lordtobi () 06:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, my recent edit is not vandalism.

[edit]

Yes. There is a new map coming. It was announced by IO Interactive yesterday during a live stream. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElijahPepe (talkcontribs) 17:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hitman 2 (2018 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 13:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take on this review. If I'm not back this time next week, ping me. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@OceanHok: Hi, I've looked through the article. Others have dealt with some issues that I might have raised or corrected. Reading through, I found the article well-written, engaging and full of useful and pertinent information. I'll happily give this a Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]