Talk:Garchomp

Video games: Nintendo / Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (1 participant)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (3 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Pokémon Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Released?

Isn't the game out? I believe it was acquired by a few people who got it from their local store early, so we'll have to wait and see for the English names. Can't wait for Sunday. BenpV2 05:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The game is not officially out for about another day where I am (Pacific Time Zone). -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 06:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New English name

Oops nevermind, I did not realize they were unreliable. Stefonational 20:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C&P

After User:Eriorguez C&P'd Gablias into Garchomp, I added it to the list of articles needing moved at WP:RM. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 20:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moveset

Is that section about a good moveset really necesary? This isn't Smogon, and no other Pokemon pages list movesets or in depth strategies.

No - see WP:NOT#IINFO. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 03:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English name origin

Before I post it I was thinking Garchomp's name origen is from the word gargantuant and chomp. Before i edit, please tell me if this is a good assumsion or not.

No - Garchomp can't outinch Yao Ming, so how can he be "gargantuan?" -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 02:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because the image was listed for reuse, and it was the only image to be available under such conditions --Professor Profession (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UnderUsed competitive tier in Pokémon Scarlet and Violet?

I knew that Garchomp went down from its former OverUsed competitive tier to right now its UnderUsed competitive tier in Pokémon Scarlet and Violet? Does this mean that Garchomp was a weaker or less popular, or does this made this guy receive it polarized reception from fans? Which do you think? Thomas Wiencek (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While this did happen, there seems to be no sourcing regarding its Underused drop. This thus does not have an impact on its response. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]