Talk:Frictional Games

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Indie Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (3 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Delete it

I am not sure about this entry!!! It is about some obscure Swedish company that apparently makes video games--BIG DEAL!! Let's delete this entry! The internets will be better off! 24.14.33.171 (talk) 20:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have anything meaningful to say keep it to yourself. --MrStalker ^(talk) 21:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unbirth

They made another game, info here: [1]--Samusaran253 (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fiend, too: http://frictionalgames.com/site/fiend/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.117.144 (talk) 03:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This game company isn't obscure

It sure isn't, it got most popular when they developed amnesia the dark descent, i've seen lots of positive reactions about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.27.80.28 (talk) 10:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly wrong statement, if someone is bored might be worth fact checking and removing/correcting

"The series was financially successful but suffered from several issues that Frictional held Paradox Interactive responsible for." > I've read the cite ref for this, and this just doesn't seem to hold up based on the reference. in the cited interview, they almost purely complain about lexicon entertainment, as well as just the nature of the chaos of a publisher switch mid-trilogy, but not that paradox (the post-switch publisher) in any way impact the series unlike all the actions by the previous publisher (lexicon). so is there an actual source for this claim specifically about paradox, or is it just incorrect? if anyone has a proper source please add it, or otherwise maybe someone reading this will be motivated to fix it e.g. by changing paradox to lexicon, or removing this sentence entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:ea:7f12:f000:7c6a:fcff:fe17:f07a (talk) 09:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I probably wrote this before it was clear that Paradox was not the original publisher. The sentence was a mess anyway, so I took it out. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 09:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]