Talk:Frequency (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Karaoke Revolution

Kareoke Revolution is not a sequel to Amplitude

The article doesn't state that Karaoke Revolution is a sequel to Amplitude. It states that Amplitude is Frequency's sequel, and that Freezepop had roles in Amplitude and Karaoke Revolution. Note that "sequel" is not plural, thus the only sequel is Amplitude. CryptoDerk 05:56, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

All I've got to say is that the entries between Frequency and Amplitude are very similar read one and then the other, you'll se what I mean. What does one do in this case? Post something about reading "Frequency" for more information? It's probably preferable to reduce the redundancy.--Headcase 21:37, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"Frequency" vs. "FreQuency"

I question the wisdom in moving it to FreQuency. Where is this particular capitalization stated as an official spelling? --Golbez 22:21, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

You can find it spelled both ways, although on Harmonix's site as well as in the game manual it is spelled with a cap Q, so I support the move (I didn't move it, but I wrote most of it). CryptoDerk 22:39, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

For the reasons stated above by CryptoDerk. --Poiuyt Man (talk) 22:42, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I actually prefer the original spelling, without the capitalization. It's referred to as simply Frequency in a majority of its original press. I don't remember seeing the capital Q until this article was moved, actually. Pele Merengue 22:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result was moved. Non-admin closure. The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FreQuency → Frequency (video game) — WP:NC(P) recommends "adding a parenthetical (bracketed) disambiguator to the page name: for instance when both spellings are often or easily confused." In this case, only capitalization separates Frequency and FreQuency.

Also WP:MOSTM states that "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner encourages special treatment". —Mika1h (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support. If someone types "FreQuency" they can be redirected. Since neither "fre" nor "quency" are words I can't see it being CamelCase, so it falls under WP:MOSTM. Let's not indulge the marketing men. --DeLarge (talk) 15:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:MOSTM --Lox (t,c) 08:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above style guidelines wrt to trademark names and disamb. --MASEM 11:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edge reflects back on frequency

[1] Will try to add later. --MASEM (t) 21:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]