User talk:Lox

Lox is taking a long wikibreak and may be back at a later date

Adminship

I just wanted to tell you that you should tell me as soon as you've got about 2000 edits, as I'd like to nominate you for adminship then. ;) Be sure to use edit summaries and participate in Wikispace, and you'll be sure to pass! (Assuming you want adminship, of course. ;)) —Nightstallion (?) 21:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nightstallion - I'm flattered! I haven't given much thought to adminship yet, but maybe in the future! Thanks again for your kind words --Lox (t,c) 21:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just tell me as soon as you feel ready and I'll nominate you. ;) —Nightstallion (?) 21:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kalmyk and Oirat pages

I request to rollback the move and splitting of Kalmyk and Oirat pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kalmyk_people

Calmouk 02:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I request to rollback the move and splitting you did on Kalmyk and Oirat pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kalmyk_people

Calmouk 02:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually move or split this page (please see Kalmyk People - History). However, thanks for letting me know about your request; please see Talk:Kalmyk people for responses from others. --Lox (t,c) 13:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rebate debate

Anyone who is a Blackadder fan is alright by me!! BTW "Ink and Incapability" was one of my favourite episodes ;) SilentC 22:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh how wonderfully ironic! Yes, I am rather a Blackadder fan, though I do love most British sitcoms! --Lox (t,c) 22:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

If I say "poll about TV vs. television", you know who I am. You left some kind words on the user talk page for this IP address, for which I thank you. I choose to remain unregistered. You should know that I am not the only person at this IP address contributing to Wikipedia, and conversely, this is not the only IP address that I contribute from. So my set of contributions may not be what you think. 66.96.28.244 04:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I must admit, I used an IP for some time before registering as a user. I hope you continue to contribute as you have done in future, but if you ever change your mind and do register, please do let me know! Take care, --Lox (t,c) 12:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Television poll - follow up

You recently voted in the poll for naming conventions for television content. I would appreciate any comments you may have for the follow-up discussion - Thanks --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 19:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==Counter-insurgency to Counterinsurgency==

There has been a new request to change the name of Counter-insurgency article to Counterinsurgency, I would request that you please comment about this new request here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Counter-insurgency#Requested_move -Signaleer 08:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Spencer (rugby player)

Many thanks for your help with the merge of this duplicated article.--Bcp67 (talk) 07:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, happy to help! --Lox (t,c) 10:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Through the Looking Glass

Um, if the result of the RM was to move the article to Through the Looking-Glass, why didn't you move it? —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 09:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would move it, but that would require administrator access. I have marked it as consensus reached at WP:RM and archived the discussion; it should be moved shortly! --Lox (t,c) 09:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize you're not an admin. I am one, so I moved it. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 12:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Lox (t,c) 18:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review for Astro Empires

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Astro Empires. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Butch-cassidy (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]