Talk:Equinox (1993 video game)

Equinox (1993 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 21, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Note that Equinox is also the title of an earlier 8-bit computer game published by Mikro-Gen in 1986. 86.131.103.170 (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this page should be deleted and remade by someone who is unbiassed--Valf 22:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, really. I think that it should be fixed up a bit (read: a lot), to make it less of a review. Wikipedia is not a repositry of reviews. ~Deku-Scrub

I made a first stab at revising it and cutting out the "review" elements. It's still got a long way to go (notably the second paragraph of the "music" section; I had no idea what to do with that thing), but I think it's a step in the right direction. DeathbyChiasmus (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EquinoxSNES boxart.jpg

Image:EquinoxSNES boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Equinox (1993 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 20:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on. If I'm not back by Saturday next, ping me. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ProtoDrake: 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 12:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HumanxAnthro Thanks for the ping. I've looked through the article. And while generally the articles in really good shape, there's one thing that's standing out. The condensing of multiple references into notes has thoroughly scrambled their display order in the article's Gameplay and Reception sections ("[29][18][6][32]" for example). The notes are great, but the refs need rearranging into numerical order. At the moment, it just looks a mess. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just fixed it!!! 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 22:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Release dates

Hello. I'm not sure what was going on with the previous release dates. They are sourced, but the sources are from before the game came out anywhere in the world, and directly contradict multiple developer statements... they seem to just be optimistic prerelease dates. The developers were interviewed here and here, both sources present in the article, which clearly state that the game was completed in summer 1993 and that it had been out in Japan for some months before releasing anywhere else. It should be noted that the second source says "18 months ago", which is strange compared to all other given statements, and seems to be an error on the part of Gamefan. It was likely meant to read 8 months ago, which aligns more neatly with the summer 1993 statement. This prototype dated March 1993 is as far back as anyone is aware.

There is also no known Australian release of this game. If such a release exists, the January 1994 release date seems unlikely, as the other non-Japan releases are claimed in the Gamefan source to have been held back due to strange technical/approval issues. The big question here is who exactly was running Nintendo's Australian operation at the time. Assuming things like this are actual Australian releases, it seems to be largely imports of European releases. If this is true, any Australian release of Equinox would be tied to the European release.

It should be noted that the dates I just added were already present in this article a few years ago. They are dates that are common across the internet, reliable source or not. In any event, these dates seem more in line with the developer statements. It's a shame that there are not better sources, but we have to make do with what we have. 2603:6081:9540:5CE:5648:C797:2F12:6A80 (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]