Talk:Enter the Dominatrix

Enter the Dominatrix has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 4, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Enter the Dominatrix appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 August 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Enter the Dominatrix was first announced as Saints Row: The Third downloadable content as an April Fool's joke, but was later incorporated into the sequel and its own downloadable content?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saints Row: The Third downloadable content, Enter the Dominatrix.

Wikipedia

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

DYK nomination

{{Did you know nominations/Saints Row: The Third downloadable content, Enter the Dominatrix}} czar ♔ 16:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Enter the Dominatrix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Red Phoenix (talk · contribs) 02:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck, I feel like being nice and doing a review. Also, the title's kind of catchy... seems to be an interesting subject. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 02:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Czar, as always you do fantastic work. There's not a lot for me to point out in this short article, but I will nitpick just a little bit:

"The pack introduces new weapons such as a heavy minigun, a flamethrower, a grenade launcher, new vehicles, and new computer-controlled support characters (homies)." Honestly, when I first read it, I thought the last bit was vandalism. I think a rewording to clarify that the computer controlled support characters are called "homies" by the game is needed.
Is there a reason "player-character" is hyphenated? I'm unfamiliar with this particular wording.
"and scheduled for the 2013." Please reword, remove "the"
"The game received "mixed or average reviews", according to video game review score aggregator Metacritic." In the lead, Enter the Dominatrix is referred to as a downloadable content pack for the video game Saints Row IV. This introduces some ambiguity; is it Saints Row IV or just Enter the Dominatrix that received mixed or average reviews?
Is there any reason specifically Metacritic and the EGM reviewer are mentioned in the lead? There's only one or two more reviewers, why highlight these two? It seems awkward for the lead.

I think that's about all I've got. Nicely done. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 02:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Phoenix, appreciate the compliment and good points. Think I got all of them—take a look? (As for "player-character", I prefer the hyphen since it makes the oneness of the player and the character more explicit. And I stumble when I see it without a hyphen or wikilink. I also think it's the more progressive stance. IAR, right? ...I change it whenever anyone calls it out.) czar ♔ 09:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All right, looks solid. I'm good with ("homies") as being a bit more explanatory, and I'm okay with "player-character" given that explanation. Looks like everything's in line to pass. Well done. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 02:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]