Talk:Doom 3: Resurrection of Evil

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

The Three New Monsters

What are they? the article doesn't state them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jayteecork (talk • contribs) .

The three new monsters are named when you encounter them. The first is Lah-Ree. The second is called Kerr-Lee and the last and most powerful is called Mo. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.44.42.5 (talk • contribs) .

Utter nonsense. They are the The Forgotten (which are horned skulls who behave almost if not exactly like lost souls), the bruisers (which behave like to crawling imps), and the vulgars. --70.25.168.90 22:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're both wrong. The first one is called Grau-Choe, the second is the Chee-koh, and the last one you encounter is the silent Har-Poh monster that wields a large pair of scissors.

No, he was right. The Forgotten, Bruisers, and Vulgars. remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes (hold shift and ````) 75.72.25.219 (talk) 23:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added in a paragraph on the new creatures. I'm going to re-write this entire article soon.65.80.226.89 04:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No new settings in RoE

The following sentence suggests that RoE offered new level themes that weren´t in the original Doom3: "...praise for Resurrection of Evil's having maps that depicted a wider variety of environments instead of industrial corridors as in the original." That´s misleading, both the ancient Martian ruins and the hell levels were already there in the original Doom3.--87.234.233.34 13:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion per AfD

Per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Artifact (Doom), the The Artifact (Doom) article needs to be merged into this article. please determine how best to do so, and then merge the article. Thanks! ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backward compatibility

Can you play this game in the 360? --MarioV 18:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it can be played on 360David Graham (talk) 14:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doom and Doom 2 as extras?

This line "The game also featured the original Doom, Doom II and the Master Levels of Doom II in the extras menu." is news to me. I've just searched through the game and the disc, can't find them. MGCooke 12:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i heard the same, someone told me that the Expansion also included the Original Doom. Can anyone confirm / deny this please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.159.229 (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i have the game and it does have doom and doom 2,cant explain why your's doesn't have them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.244.81.60 (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no, xbox version only —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.135.207.112 (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2009

Fair use rationale for Image:Artifactdoom3roe.JPG

Image:Artifactdoom3roe.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]