Talk:Don James (executive)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don James (executive) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Don James" executive – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Deletion

Doesn't anyone give detailed explanations for this anymore? The fact that this talk page hadn't been created until now is a point against the deletionist who wants to get rid of this thing.

As long as it's wikified and verified it should be fine, seeing as this guy sounds like a major player (if it's true he helped bring consoles back after the 1983 crash, that is). Mk623SC20K 18:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to cut the list of charity work he's done since that may look to someone like a vanity style article. I had taken it from his bio because Nintendo is way-above-average in their support of American charities, and James, Lincoln and Arakawa were all extensively involved in this.

James is not a mid-level executive, but if he'd only held his "one of the most powerful behind the scenes people in the games industry" senior job the last few years I could see an argument about notability. But if a) Being a key (if unpublicized) player in rebuilding the industry after the Video game crash of 1983, b) being a key player in the creation of E3, and c) being a key player in the creation of the ESRB doesn;t make you notable, we'd better get to work. We have THOUSANDS of articles to delete from Wikipedia because their subjects did far less than Don James. Coll7 19:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who nominated this for a PROD I am delighted that it has been edited to meet my concerns. I now fully support this article's inclusion. Maustrauser 22:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And sorry if I sounded defensive... Gotta admit the rewrite made it a better article. Coll7 03:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Context and notability

I had to read this article twice before I understood the context and why this guy might be notable as opposed to some middle-management guy at one company in the 1980s. It would be great if this could get wikified and his notability could be asserted a little more strongly. Surfer83 (talk) 22:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]