Talk:Digital Monster

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Melee (game terminology) (0 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Anime and manga: Digimon Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Digimon work group.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Article name change

Noting that a discussion about changing the name of this article is happening on WT:DIGI#Change title of Digimon Battle Pet Article. -- Ned Scott 02:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion ended, article name changed from Digimon Battle Pets to Digimon virtual pet. --Gear-Richie 22:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prerequisites for ultimate

According to the article:

"For a Digimon to grow into Ultimate level, Digimon must at least battle fifteen times in Rookie and Champion levels.

Digimon could only reach the Ultimate level by battling 40 times in their lifetime and winning at least 60% of them (unconfirmed)."

Why are two contradicting statements written in the same paragraph? Since no sources are used, (i.e. orginal research, but is [probably] acceptable in a document like this), the more "reliable" one should be included. I'm pretty sure that there's a minimum win percentage, but "40 times" is by far too high in terms of number.

Yoda921 05:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Yoda[reply]

Since nobody has answered me, I've fixed this.

Yoda921 06:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Yoda[reply]

Digimon VI

The section on VI I believe is entirely wrong. First off, you state that it is only rumoured, however it is very much real, and is an official product from Bandai. Secondly, the list of digimon are very much wrong. The digimon available, are from the Digimon II.

Compared to the American/Global versions, the Digimon VI, seems like an entirely new product, gameplay-wise. The Training system involves bar going up and down, while you try to stop it at the very end. Only then will your digimon, lose the weight.

The Ultimate Digimon, from my experience are also obtained diferently. There is only one ultimate if I remember correctly, Tekkamon, and to obtain it, there is no battle limit. The only requirement is to have 60%+. I may be wrong about this, there may be a way to get the other ultimates, such as winning 15, or 40 battles with 60% on record.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.238.99.39 (talk • contribs).

This article is a mess.

It's redundant, it's dubious, it's poorly formatted...where are all the Digimon fanboys? Someone please clean this up with sources, or I'll chop all out. 69.182.67.235 (talk) 02:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's kind of bogged down with useless detail, but considering it's what started the rest of the Digimon media, I don't think it would be prudent to erase the whole article. 205.133.172.113 (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the(so far)only citations and refs on this page.--Rockclaw1030 (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

intro

the intro says it came out in 1995 it came out in 1997 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.225.22 (talk) 10:36, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sales figures

the numbers no longer make sense. bandai announced in december 2021 they had sold 14 million units since 1997. we list 14 million sold in 2004, and 24 million units in 2005.Muur (talk) 20:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]