Talk:Dig Dug: Digging Strike
 | Dig Dug: Digging Strike has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 28, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
Fair use rationale for Image:DigDugDiggingStrike screenshot.jpg
[edit]
Image:DigDugDiggingStrike screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:DigDugDiggingStrike-DS-Box.jpg
[edit]Image:DigDugDiggingStrike-DS-Box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Dig Dug: Digging Strike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 16:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- The gameplay image does not appear to have an actual source.
- Fixed.
- I can't really see if the source is accurate as I cannot read Japanese, but does it confirm that Bullets is known for their work on Hero Bank?
- Yes. Under the section that says "2014" it lists both Hero Bank and Hero Bank 2. I found this out by simply using Google Translate. Namcokid47 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- My question is though is if it says they are known for it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- They helped work on it, but saying they're "known" for it is a real stretch. Changed the sentences. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- My question is though is if it says they are known for it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. Under the section that says "2014" it lists both Hero Bank and Hero Bank 2. I found this out by simply using Google Translate. Namcokid47 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I would recommend taking text that is a large quotation, such as with Nintendo World Report, and rewriting it to be a summation of what they said instead. In general I encourage that you get the sentiment across of what they said, like instead of quoting IGN saying ugly you might try something else.
- Fixed. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sources that it combines mechanics from Dig Dugs 1 and 2 should be used in the Gameplay section as well.
- Done. I also went ahead and sourced the Gameplay section in general (something I strangely never did). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- All right, that should be everything then. Nice job with this article. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Done. I also went ahead and sourced the Gameplay section in general (something I strangely never did). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)