Talk:Dig Dug: Digging Strike/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 16:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- The gameplay image does not appear to have an actual source.
- Fixed.
- I can't really see if the source is accurate as I cannot read Japanese, but does it confirm that Bullets is known for their work on Hero Bank?
- Yes. Under the section that says "2014" it lists both Hero Bank and Hero Bank 2. I found this out by simply using Google Translate. Namcokid47 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- My question is though is if it says they are known for it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- They helped work on it, but saying they're "known" for it is a real stretch. Changed the sentences. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- My question is though is if it says they are known for it. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. Under the section that says "2014" it lists both Hero Bank and Hero Bank 2. I found this out by simply using Google Translate. Namcokid47 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I would recommend taking text that is a large quotation, such as with Nintendo World Report, and rewriting it to be a summation of what they said instead. In general I encourage that you get the sentiment across of what they said, like instead of quoting IGN saying ugly you might try something else.
- Fixed. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sources that it combines mechanics from Dig Dugs 1 and 2 should be used in the Gameplay section as well.
- Done. I also went ahead and sourced the Gameplay section in general (something I strangely never did). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- All right, that should be everything then. Nice job with this article. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Done. I also went ahead and sourced the Gameplay section in general (something I strangely never did). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)