Talk:Clock Tower (1996 video game)

Clock Tower (1996 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Clock Tower (1996 video game) is part of the Clock Tower series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 17, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (9 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

File:Clock Tower 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Clock Tower 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Clock Tower (video game) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 20:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Clock Tower (1996 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 22:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be back to this with a review shortly. If I'm not back in four days, ping me.

Review

"Each character has three levels of strength." - It doesn't say anything about multiple characters until much later in the section. This needs addressing.
- Changed to "The player character..."
"After the events of Clock Tower (1995), Jennifer Simpson was adopted by Helen Maxwell" - Maybe alter the link to read "After the events of the original Clock Tower, central protagonist Jennifer Simpson was adopted by Helen Maxwell".
- Done
"The game offered a deep horror atmosphere that few games at the time had" - Who said this?
- That was a stretch of what was said in first paragraph of GameSpot review. Reworded.
"[15][1][2]" - This sequence appears repeatedly in the Reception section. It needs to be rearranged as "[1][2][15]".
- Done
"In 2006, GameTrailers placed Clock Tower at #10 on their "Top Ten Horror Games" list.[22]" - That's inaccurate. [ This] is their "Top Ten Horror Games" list, and it makes no mention of Clock Tower. The reference says "Top Ten Scariest Games", which does. The prose needs correction to match up with the reference.
- Done
As a matter of safety, you should archive the online references.
- Done

That's all I found. I'll put the article on hold until the issues are addressed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ProtoDrake: Thanks for this review, all issues addressed. TarkusAB 03:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TarkusAB: Don't see anything else outstanding. I'll give this a Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contemporary reviews:

Yeah, gonna be difficult for a JP only game, but it would be nice if this article could have some more contemporary reviews added. I added Famitsu's score, which is a start. I'll keep looking around. The source would be gaming mags from 96. Harizotoh9 (talk) 09:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]