Talk:Cindy Aurum

Cindy Aurum has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 12, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Emote (1 participant)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (3 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Square Enix Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 11:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will hit this up soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

GA Criteria

1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Broad in coverage. Covers multiple aspects of the subject.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. No vandalism from what I can tell.

6. Two fair use images, one CC image. The former two have proper usage rationales.

Lead

-Could you define in greater depth what a "Cid" is in the lead, aka what it does/means in the series context?

Expanded with more info here and in the design info.

Concept and creation

-Section looks good.

Appearances

-Section looks good.

Promotion and reception

-"characters like Cindy represented the rougher edges of a title that went through a troubled development." How so?

Fixed with a small rewrite, should hopefully be clearer.

-I feel the use of "titillate" may be confusing due to its status as a more niche word. I'd change it, though you can leave it if you feel it best.

Put quotes around titillate as it's an exact quote, and tried to make clearer.

-Overall looks fine. I've made some touch-ups for minor fixes such as typos and such in places.

Overall

Article looks good overall. Just touch on these points and I'll be happy to pass this article.

All should be fixed, let me know if there's anything else to tidy!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]