Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 11:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Will hit this up soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
@Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)
GA Criteria
[edit]1. Article is well-written.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Broad in coverage. Covers multiple aspects of the subject.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. No vandalism from what I can tell.
6. Two fair use images, one CC image. The former two have proper usage rationales.
Lead
[edit]-Could you define in greater depth what a "Cid" is in the lead, aka what it does/means in the series context?
- Expanded with more info here and in the design info.
Concept and creation
[edit]-Section looks good.
Appearances
[edit]-Section looks good.
Promotion and reception
[edit]-"characters like Cindy represented the rougher edges of a title that went through a troubled development." How so?
- Fixed with a small rewrite, should hopefully be clearer.
-I feel the use of "titillate" may be confusing due to its status as a more niche word. I'd change it, though you can leave it if you feel it best.
- Put quotes around titillate as it's an exact quote, and tried to make clearer.
-Overall looks fine. I've made some touch-ups for minor fixes such as typos and such in places.
Overall
[edit]Article looks good overall. Just touch on these points and I'll be happy to pass this article.
- All should be fixed, let me know if there's anything else to tidy!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good! Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)